WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:04.720 --> 00:00:08.870 align:start position:0% all<00:00:04.880> right 00:00:08.870 --> 00:00:08.880 align:start position:0% 00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:11.669 align:start position:0% i'm<00:00:09.040> gonna<00:00:09.519> call<00:00:09.760> the<00:00:09.920> meeting<00:00:10.160> to<00:00:10.320> order 00:00:11.669 --> 00:00:11.679 align:start position:0% i'm gonna call the meeting to order 00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:13.669 align:start position:0% i'm gonna call the meeting to order i'm<00:00:11.920> not<00:00:12.160> jim<00:00:12.400> cummings<00:00:12.799> but<00:00:12.960> i<00:00:13.120> play<00:00:13.360> him<00:00:13.519> on 00:00:13.669 --> 00:00:13.679 align:start position:0% i'm not jim cummings but i play him on 00:00:13.679 --> 00:00:15.829 align:start position:0% i'm not jim cummings but i play him on tv<00:00:14.480> so 00:00:15.829 --> 00:00:15.839 align:start position:0% tv so 00:00:15.839 --> 00:00:17.590 align:start position:0% tv so john<00:00:16.080> mark<00:00:16.320> hogue<00:00:16.720> here<00:00:16.960> is<00:00:17.039> sitting<00:00:17.279> in<00:00:17.440> his 00:00:17.590 --> 00:00:17.600 align:start position:0% john mark hogue here is sitting in his 00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:20.630 align:start position:0% john mark hogue here is sitting in his vice<00:00:17.920> chair<00:00:18.640> recalling<00:00:19.119> the<00:00:19.279> agenda<00:00:19.680> today 00:00:20.630 --> 00:00:20.640 align:start position:0% vice chair recalling the agenda today 00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:23.750 align:start position:0% vice chair recalling the agenda today um<00:00:21.279> we<00:00:21.439> have<00:00:21.600> a<00:00:21.760> quorum<00:00:22.320> it<00:00:22.480> appears<00:00:23.119> mr<00:00:23.439> james 00:00:23.750 --> 00:00:23.760 align:start position:0% um we have a quorum it appears mr james 00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:26.150 align:start position:0% um we have a quorum it appears mr james we<00:00:24.000> confirmed<00:00:24.560> that<00:00:25.039> all<00:00:25.199> right<00:00:25.760> so<00:00:26.000> we'll 00:00:26.150 --> 00:00:26.160 align:start position:0% we confirmed that all right so we'll 00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:27.429 align:start position:0% we confirmed that all right so we'll proceed<00:00:26.720> on 00:00:27.429 --> 00:00:27.439 align:start position:0% proceed on 00:00:27.439 --> 00:00:29.910 align:start position:0% proceed on uh<00:00:27.760> the<00:00:27.920> first<00:00:28.240> item<00:00:28.480> on<00:00:28.640> the<00:00:28.800> agenda<00:00:29.359> is<00:00:29.599> any 00:00:29.910 --> 00:00:29.920 align:start position:0% uh the first item on the agenda is any 00:00:29.920 --> 00:00:31.830 align:start position:0% uh the first item on the agenda is any public<00:00:30.320> comment 00:00:31.830 --> 00:00:31.840 align:start position:0% public comment 00:00:31.840 --> 00:00:33.990 align:start position:0% public comment i<00:00:31.920> don't<00:00:32.160> know<00:00:32.399> that<00:00:32.559> there's<00:00:32.800> anyone<00:00:33.200> here 00:00:33.990 --> 00:00:34.000 align:start position:0% i don't know that there's anyone here 00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:35.910 align:start position:0% i don't know that there's anyone here there's<00:00:34.160> no<00:00:34.399> public<00:00:34.800> here<00:00:35.120> so 00:00:35.910 --> 00:00:35.920 align:start position:0% there's no public here so 00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:38.470 align:start position:0% there's no public here so we'll<00:00:36.079> proceed<00:00:36.559> on<00:00:36.880> the<00:00:37.040> next<00:00:37.360> one 00:00:38.470 --> 00:00:38.480 align:start position:0% we'll proceed on the next one 00:00:38.480 --> 00:00:40.150 align:start position:0% we'll proceed on the next one consideration<00:00:39.200> of<00:00:39.360> approving<00:00:39.760> the<00:00:39.840> minutes 00:00:40.150 --> 00:00:40.160 align:start position:0% consideration of approving the minutes 00:00:40.160 --> 00:00:43.270 align:start position:0% consideration of approving the minutes from<00:00:40.320> the<00:00:40.480> august<00:00:40.879> 24th<00:00:41.559> 2021<00:00:42.640> tours<00:00:43.040> board 00:00:43.270 --> 00:00:43.280 align:start position:0% from the august 24th 2021 tours board 00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:45.830 align:start position:0% from the august 24th 2021 tours board meeting<00:00:44.079> everyone<00:00:44.399> should<00:00:44.559> have<00:00:44.719> received 00:00:45.830 --> 00:00:45.840 align:start position:0% meeting everyone should have received 00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:47.910 align:start position:0% meeting everyone should have received i<00:00:46.000> had<00:00:46.160> a<00:00:46.239> copy<00:00:46.640> available<00:00:47.039> there<00:00:47.120> are<00:00:47.280> other 00:00:47.910 --> 00:00:47.920 align:start position:0% i had a copy available there are other 00:00:47.920 --> 00:00:49.350 align:start position:0% i had a copy available there are other copies<00:00:48.320> here<00:00:48.640> still<00:00:48.800> available<00:00:49.200> if<00:00:49.280> you 00:00:49.350 --> 00:00:49.360 align:start position:0% copies here still available if you 00:00:49.360 --> 00:00:53.510 align:start position:0% copies here still available if you haven't<00:00:49.680> had<00:00:49.840> a<00:00:49.920> chance<00:00:50.160> to<00:00:50.320> look<00:00:50.480> at<00:00:50.640> that<00:00:50.800> yet 00:00:53.510 --> 00:00:53.520 align:start position:0% 00:00:53.520 --> 00:00:55.750 align:start position:0% motion<00:00:53.840> to<00:00:54.000> approve<00:00:54.320> by<00:00:54.480> mr<00:00:54.800> gaylor<00:00:55.199> hi<00:00:55.360> second 00:00:55.750 --> 00:00:55.760 align:start position:0% motion to approve by mr gaylor hi second 00:00:55.760 --> 00:00:59.349 align:start position:0% motion to approve by mr gaylor hi second second<00:00:56.079> by<00:00:56.160> mr<00:00:56.480> fernandez<00:00:57.440> any<00:00:57.760> discussion 00:00:59.349 --> 00:00:59.359 align:start position:0% second by mr fernandez any discussion 00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:02.709 align:start position:0% second by mr fernandez any discussion all<00:00:59.440> those<00:00:59.760> in<00:00:59.920> favor<00:01:00.399> say<00:01:00.800> yes<00:01:01.440> yes<00:01:01.840> yes 00:01:02.709 --> 00:01:02.719 align:start position:0% all those in favor say yes yes yes 00:01:02.719 --> 00:01:04.710 align:start position:0% all those in favor say yes yes yes any<00:01:02.960> opposed<00:01:03.440> say<00:01:03.680> no 00:01:04.710 --> 00:01:04.720 align:start position:0% any opposed say no 00:01:04.720 --> 00:01:06.550 align:start position:0% any opposed say no and<00:01:04.960> the<00:01:05.040> motion<00:01:05.439> is<00:01:05.600> approved<00:01:05.920> minutes<00:01:06.320> are 00:01:06.550 --> 00:01:06.560 align:start position:0% and the motion is approved minutes are 00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:10.390 align:start position:0% and the motion is approved minutes are approved 00:01:10.390 --> 00:01:10.400 align:start position:0% 00:01:10.400 --> 00:01:12.390 align:start position:0% item<00:01:10.720> number<00:01:11.040> four<00:01:11.360> discussion<00:01:11.840> and<00:01:12.000> possible 00:01:12.390 --> 00:01:12.400 align:start position:0% item number four discussion and possible 00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:14.149 align:start position:0% item number four discussion and possible action<00:01:12.640> on<00:01:12.799> amendments<00:01:13.280> to<00:01:13.360> the<00:01:13.520> tears<00:01:13.840> north 00:01:14.149 --> 00:01:14.159 align:start position:0% action on amendments to the tears north 00:01:14.159 --> 00:01:16.550 align:start position:0% action on amendments to the tears north and<00:01:14.320> tears<00:01:14.640> south<00:01:14.960> incentives<00:01:15.600> policies<00:01:16.159> mr 00:01:16.550 --> 00:01:16.560 align:start position:0% and tears south incentives policies mr 00:01:16.560 --> 00:01:19.590 align:start position:0% and tears south incentives policies mr james 00:01:19.590 --> 00:01:19.600 align:start position:0% 00:01:19.600 --> 00:01:21.830 align:start position:0% thank<00:01:19.840> you 00:01:21.830 --> 00:01:21.840 align:start position:0% thank you 00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:23.190 align:start position:0% thank you this<00:01:22.000> is<00:01:22.159> the<00:01:22.320> item<00:01:22.560> that<00:01:22.640> you<00:01:22.799> all<00:01:22.960> talked 00:01:23.190 --> 00:01:23.200 align:start position:0% this is the item that you all talked 00:01:23.200 --> 00:01:24.230 align:start position:0% this is the item that you all talked about<00:01:23.439> at<00:01:23.520> your 00:01:24.230 --> 00:01:24.240 align:start position:0% about at your 00:01:24.240 --> 00:01:26.469 align:start position:0% about at your most<00:01:24.400> recent<00:01:24.799> meeting<00:01:25.439> and 00:01:26.469 --> 00:01:26.479 align:start position:0% most recent meeting and 00:01:26.479 --> 00:01:28.070 align:start position:0% most recent meeting and i<00:01:26.560> think<00:01:26.720> the<00:01:26.880> direction<00:01:27.280> from<00:01:27.439> the<00:01:27.520> board<00:01:27.840> was 00:01:28.070 --> 00:01:28.080 align:start position:0% i think the direction from the board was 00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:30.710 align:start position:0% i think the direction from the board was to<00:01:28.799> proceed<00:01:29.759> and 00:01:30.710 --> 00:01:30.720 align:start position:0% to proceed and 00:01:30.720 --> 00:01:33.109 align:start position:0% to proceed and to<00:01:30.880> draft<00:01:31.280> up<00:01:31.439> the<00:01:31.600> changes<00:01:32.000> to<00:01:32.159> the<00:01:32.240> policy 00:01:33.109 --> 00:01:33.119 align:start position:0% to draft up the changes to the policy 00:01:33.119 --> 00:01:35.350 align:start position:0% to draft up the changes to the policy and<00:01:33.840> that's<00:01:34.079> what<00:01:34.240> we've<00:01:34.400> done<00:01:34.640> and<00:01:34.799> so<00:01:34.960> we 00:01:35.350 --> 00:01:35.360 align:start position:0% and that's what we've done and so we 00:01:35.360 --> 00:01:37.190 align:start position:0% and that's what we've done and so we sent<00:01:35.520> that<00:01:35.759> out<00:01:35.840> to<00:01:36.000> you<00:01:36.640> i'm<00:01:36.799> going<00:01:36.880> to<00:01:36.960> go 00:01:37.190 --> 00:01:37.200 align:start position:0% sent that out to you i'm going to go 00:01:37.200 --> 00:01:39.190 align:start position:0% sent that out to you i'm going to go through<00:01:37.920> kind<00:01:38.079> of<00:01:38.159> the<00:01:38.320> overview<00:01:38.880> a<00:01:38.960> lot<00:01:39.119> of 00:01:39.190 --> 00:01:39.200 align:start position:0% through kind of the overview a lot of 00:01:39.200 --> 00:01:41.190 align:start position:0% through kind of the overview a lot of these<00:01:39.360> slides<00:01:39.680> look<00:01:40.000> similar<00:01:40.479> because<00:01:40.799> it's 00:01:41.190 --> 00:01:41.200 align:start position:0% these slides look similar because it's 00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:42.389 align:start position:0% these slides look similar because it's it's 00:01:42.389 --> 00:01:42.399 align:start position:0% it's 00:01:42.399 --> 00:01:44.230 align:start position:0% it's much<00:01:42.640> of<00:01:42.799> it<00:01:42.960> is<00:01:43.040> what<00:01:43.200> you<00:01:43.360> saw<00:01:43.600> last<00:01:43.840> time<00:01:44.079> but 00:01:44.230 --> 00:01:44.240 align:start position:0% much of it is what you saw last time but 00:01:44.240 --> 00:01:45.990 align:start position:0% much of it is what you saw last time but there's<00:01:44.399> some<00:01:44.640> clarification 00:01:45.990 --> 00:01:46.000 align:start position:0% there's some clarification 00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:48.069 align:start position:0% there's some clarification uh<00:01:46.240> on<00:01:46.399> some<00:01:46.560> of<00:01:46.640> the<00:01:46.799> items<00:01:47.200> so<00:01:47.759> one<00:01:47.920> of<00:01:48.000> the 00:01:48.069 --> 00:01:48.079 align:start position:0% uh on some of the items so one of the 00:01:48.079 --> 00:01:49.590 align:start position:0% uh on some of the items so one of the first<00:01:48.320> questions<00:01:48.640> we<00:01:48.799> asked<00:01:49.040> you<00:01:49.200> last<00:01:49.439> time 00:01:49.590 --> 00:01:49.600 align:start position:0% first questions we asked you last time 00:01:49.600 --> 00:01:52.149 align:start position:0% first questions we asked you last time was<00:01:49.840> what<00:01:50.079> qualifies<00:01:50.960> as<00:01:51.119> a<00:01:51.280> match 00:01:52.149 --> 00:01:52.159 align:start position:0% was what qualifies as a match 00:01:52.159 --> 00:01:54.550 align:start position:0% was what qualifies as a match matching<00:01:52.560> funds<00:01:53.360> and<00:01:53.520> i<00:01:53.600> think<00:01:53.840> the<00:01:54.000> consensus 00:01:54.550 --> 00:01:54.560 align:start position:0% matching funds and i think the consensus 00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:57.030 align:start position:0% matching funds and i think the consensus was<00:01:54.880> and<00:01:54.960> staff's<00:01:55.360> recommendation<00:01:56.000> was<00:01:56.240> that 00:01:57.030 --> 00:01:57.040 align:start position:0% was and staff's recommendation was that 00:01:57.040 --> 00:01:59.429 align:start position:0% was and staff's recommendation was that only<00:01:57.439> tiers<00:01:57.920> eligible<00:01:58.399> expenses<00:01:59.040> should<00:01:59.200> be 00:01:59.429 --> 00:01:59.439 align:start position:0% only tiers eligible expenses should be 00:01:59.439 --> 00:02:02.149 align:start position:0% only tiers eligible expenses should be counted<00:01:59.840> as<00:02:00.000> a<00:02:00.079> match<00:02:00.560> towards<00:02:00.960> the<00:02:01.119> tiers<00:02:01.920> so 00:02:02.149 --> 00:02:02.159 align:start position:0% counted as a match towards the tiers so 00:02:02.159 --> 00:02:03.749 align:start position:0% counted as a match towards the tiers so i<00:02:02.240> know<00:02:02.320> we<00:02:02.479> have<00:02:02.560> a<00:02:02.640> lot<00:02:02.799> of<00:02:02.960> projects<00:02:03.439> that 00:02:03.749 --> 00:02:03.759 align:start position:0% i know we have a lot of projects that 00:02:03.759 --> 00:02:06.469 align:start position:0% i know we have a lot of projects that the<00:02:03.920> project<00:02:04.399> itself<00:02:04.880> is<00:02:05.119> much<00:02:05.439> larger 00:02:06.469 --> 00:02:06.479 align:start position:0% the project itself is much larger 00:02:06.479 --> 00:02:07.429 align:start position:0% the project itself is much larger than 00:02:07.429 --> 00:02:07.439 align:start position:0% than 00:02:07.439 --> 00:02:09.190 align:start position:0% than what<00:02:07.600> they're<00:02:07.840> asking<00:02:08.160> for<00:02:08.319> tiers<00:02:08.640> money<00:02:08.879> for 00:02:09.190 --> 00:02:09.200 align:start position:0% what they're asking for tiers money for 00:02:09.200 --> 00:02:11.350 align:start position:0% what they're asking for tiers money for but<00:02:09.840> uh<00:02:10.080> you<00:02:10.239> know<00:02:10.399> all<00:02:10.560> of<00:02:10.720> that<00:02:10.879> other<00:02:11.120> stuff 00:02:11.350 --> 00:02:11.360 align:start position:0% but uh you know all of that other stuff 00:02:11.360 --> 00:02:13.270 align:start position:0% but uh you know all of that other stuff that<00:02:11.520> they're<00:02:11.680> doing<00:02:12.000> on<00:02:12.080> a<00:02:12.239> project 00:02:13.270 --> 00:02:13.280 align:start position:0% that they're doing on a project 00:02:13.280 --> 00:02:14.630 align:start position:0% that they're doing on a project um 00:02:14.630 --> 00:02:14.640 align:start position:0% um 00:02:14.640 --> 00:02:16.470 align:start position:0% um is<00:02:14.800> not<00:02:15.040> what<00:02:15.200> was<00:02:15.440> intended<00:02:15.920> originally<00:02:16.400> at 00:02:16.470 --> 00:02:16.480 align:start position:0% is not what was intended originally at 00:02:16.480 --> 00:02:17.670 align:start position:0% is not what was intended originally at least<00:02:16.800> for 00:02:17.670 --> 00:02:17.680 align:start position:0% least for 00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:20.390 align:start position:0% least for the<00:02:17.920> uh<00:02:18.480> the<00:02:18.640> matching<00:02:19.120> funds<00:02:19.440> so 00:02:20.390 --> 00:02:20.400 align:start position:0% the uh the matching funds so 00:02:20.400 --> 00:02:22.229 align:start position:0% the uh the matching funds so only<00:02:20.720> those<00:02:21.120> items<00:02:21.440> that<00:02:21.680> you're<00:02:21.920> doing 00:02:22.229 --> 00:02:22.239 align:start position:0% only those items that you're doing 00:02:22.239 --> 00:02:24.550 align:start position:0% only those items that you're doing tiers-eligible<00:02:23.599> uh 00:02:24.550 --> 00:02:24.560 align:start position:0% tiers-eligible uh 00:02:24.560 --> 00:02:26.309 align:start position:0% tiers-eligible uh expenditures 00:02:26.309 --> 00:02:26.319 align:start position:0% expenditures 00:02:26.319 --> 00:02:28.790 align:start position:0% expenditures those<00:02:26.720> would<00:02:27.280> have<00:02:27.440> to<00:02:27.599> qualify<00:02:28.080> as<00:02:28.239> match<00:02:28.560> but 00:02:28.790 --> 00:02:28.800 align:start position:0% those would have to qualify as match but 00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:30.790 align:start position:0% those would have to qualify as match but other<00:02:29.040> things<00:02:29.280> above<00:02:29.599> and<00:02:29.680> beyond<00:02:30.080> that 00:02:30.790 --> 00:02:30.800 align:start position:0% other things above and beyond that 00:02:30.800 --> 00:02:32.630 align:start position:0% other things above and beyond that interior<00:02:31.360> remodeling<00:02:32.000> things<00:02:32.239> like<00:02:32.400> that 00:02:32.630 --> 00:02:32.640 align:start position:0% interior remodeling things like that 00:02:32.640 --> 00:02:34.150 align:start position:0% interior remodeling things like that that<00:02:32.879> aren't 00:02:34.150 --> 00:02:34.160 align:start position:0% that aren't 00:02:34.160 --> 00:02:36.229 align:start position:0% that aren't eligible<00:02:34.560> for<00:02:34.720> tears<00:02:35.040> funds<00:02:35.519> wouldn't<00:02:35.920> also 00:02:36.229 --> 00:02:36.239 align:start position:0% eligible for tears funds wouldn't also 00:02:36.239 --> 00:02:38.710 align:start position:0% eligible for tears funds wouldn't also be<00:02:36.400> able<00:02:36.640> to<00:02:36.720> count<00:02:36.959> as<00:02:37.040> match 00:02:38.710 --> 00:02:38.720 align:start position:0% be able to count as match 00:02:38.720 --> 00:02:40.150 align:start position:0% be able to count as match and<00:02:38.879> feel<00:02:39.120> free<00:02:39.280> to<00:02:39.440> stop<00:02:39.599> me<00:02:39.760> through<00:02:39.920> here<00:02:40.000> if 00:02:40.150 --> 00:02:40.160 align:start position:0% and feel free to stop me through here if 00:02:40.160 --> 00:02:43.830 align:start position:0% and feel free to stop me through here if you'll<00:02:40.319> have<00:02:40.480> questions<00:02:40.879> on<00:02:41.040> any<00:02:41.200> of<00:02:41.280> these 00:02:43.830 --> 00:02:43.840 align:start position:0% 00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:45.589 align:start position:0% should<00:02:44.080> matching<00:02:44.480> be<00:02:44.640> required<00:02:45.200> that<00:02:45.360> was<00:02:45.519> a 00:02:45.589 --> 00:02:45.599 align:start position:0% should matching be required that was a 00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:47.110 align:start position:0% should matching be required that was a question<00:02:45.920> that<00:02:46.080> came<00:02:46.319> up<00:02:46.480> at<00:02:46.560> a<00:02:46.640> previous 00:02:47.110 --> 00:02:47.120 align:start position:0% question that came up at a previous 00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:48.869 align:start position:0% question that came up at a previous meeting 00:02:48.869 --> 00:02:48.879 align:start position:0% meeting 00:02:48.879 --> 00:02:50.790 align:start position:0% meeting we<00:02:49.120> are<00:02:49.200> not<00:02:49.440> proposing<00:02:49.920> any<00:02:50.160> changes<00:02:50.560> in<00:02:50.640> that 00:02:50.790 --> 00:02:50.800 align:start position:0% we are not proposing any changes in that 00:02:50.800 --> 00:02:53.110 align:start position:0% we are not proposing any changes in that regard<00:02:51.360> based<00:02:51.599> on<00:02:51.680> the<00:02:51.840> discussion<00:02:52.239> last<00:02:52.560> time 00:02:53.110 --> 00:02:53.120 align:start position:0% regard based on the discussion last time 00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:54.710 align:start position:0% regard based on the discussion last time there<00:02:53.280> was<00:02:53.519> some<00:02:53.760> discussion<00:02:54.239> at<00:02:54.400> the<00:02:54.480> last 00:02:54.710 --> 00:02:54.720 align:start position:0% there was some discussion at the last 00:02:54.720 --> 00:02:57.030 align:start position:0% there was some discussion at the last meeting<00:02:55.040> about<00:02:55.599> reducing<00:02:56.160> the<00:02:56.319> match<00:02:56.720> in<00:02:56.879> the 00:02:57.030 --> 00:02:57.040 align:start position:0% meeting about reducing the match in the 00:02:57.040 --> 00:02:57.990 align:start position:0% meeting about reducing the match in the south 00:02:57.990 --> 00:02:58.000 align:start position:0% south 00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.070 align:start position:0% south uh<00:02:58.400> for<00:02:58.640> projects<00:02:59.120> less<00:02:59.360> than<00:02:59.519> ten<00:02:59.760> thousand 00:03:00.070 --> 00:03:00.080 align:start position:0% uh for projects less than ten thousand 00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:03.030 align:start position:0% uh for projects less than ten thousand dollars<00:03:00.879> as<00:03:01.040> you<00:03:01.200> know<00:03:01.440> in<00:03:01.519> the<00:03:01.760> north 00:03:03.030 --> 00:03:03.040 align:start position:0% dollars as you know in the north 00:03:03.040 --> 00:03:04.390 align:start position:0% dollars as you know in the north for<00:03:03.280> projects<00:03:03.680> less<00:03:03.840> than<00:03:04.000> ten<00:03:04.159> thousand 00:03:04.390 --> 00:03:04.400 align:start position:0% for projects less than ten thousand 00:03:04.400 --> 00:03:06.550 align:start position:0% for projects less than ten thousand dollars<00:03:04.800> there's<00:03:05.040> no<00:03:05.280> match<00:03:05.599> required<00:03:06.319> that's 00:03:06.550 --> 00:03:06.560 align:start position:0% dollars there's no match required that's 00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:08.790 align:start position:0% dollars there's no match required that's partly<00:03:06.959> because<00:03:07.280> we<00:03:07.440> have<00:03:08.080> uh<00:03:08.319> significant 00:03:08.790 --> 00:03:08.800 align:start position:0% partly because we have uh significant 00:03:08.800 --> 00:03:10.229 align:start position:0% partly because we have uh significant amounts<00:03:09.120> of<00:03:09.280> money<00:03:09.519> in<00:03:09.599> the<00:03:09.680> north<00:03:10.000> and<00:03:10.159> we 00:03:10.229 --> 00:03:10.239 align:start position:0% amounts of money in the north and we 00:03:10.239 --> 00:03:11.750 align:start position:0% amounts of money in the north and we thought<00:03:10.480> that<00:03:10.640> would<00:03:10.720> help<00:03:11.040> incentivize<00:03:11.599> some 00:03:11.750 --> 00:03:11.760 align:start position:0% thought that would help incentivize some 00:03:11.760 --> 00:03:14.949 align:start position:0% thought that would help incentivize some of<00:03:11.840> those<00:03:12.080> pro<00:03:12.400> small<00:03:12.720> projects 00:03:14.949 --> 00:03:14.959 align:start position:0% of those pro small projects 00:03:14.959 --> 00:03:15.750 align:start position:0% of those pro small projects but 00:03:15.750 --> 00:03:15.760 align:start position:0% but 00:03:15.760 --> 00:03:18.149 align:start position:0% but given<00:03:16.239> the<00:03:16.640> number<00:03:17.040> of<00:03:17.280> applications<00:03:17.920> we 00:03:18.149 --> 00:03:18.159 align:start position:0% given the number of applications we 00:03:18.159 --> 00:03:20.229 align:start position:0% given the number of applications we generally<00:03:18.560> have<00:03:18.800> in<00:03:18.879> the<00:03:19.040> south<00:03:19.840> and<00:03:20.000> we're 00:03:20.229 --> 00:03:20.239 align:start position:0% generally have in the south and we're 00:03:20.239 --> 00:03:22.390 align:start position:0% generally have in the south and we're not<00:03:20.480> able<00:03:20.720> to<00:03:20.879> fund<00:03:21.280> all<00:03:21.440> of<00:03:21.519> those<00:03:21.840> projects 00:03:22.390 --> 00:03:22.400 align:start position:0% not able to fund all of those projects 00:03:22.400 --> 00:03:25.190 align:start position:0% not able to fund all of those projects anyway<00:03:22.879> in<00:03:23.040> most<00:03:23.360> cycles 00:03:25.190 --> 00:03:25.200 align:start position:0% anyway in most cycles 00:03:25.200 --> 00:03:27.110 align:start position:0% anyway in most cycles we're<00:03:25.440> recommending<00:03:26.080> keeping<00:03:26.480> that<00:03:26.720> match<00:03:27.040> in 00:03:27.110 --> 00:03:27.120 align:start position:0% we're recommending keeping that match in 00:03:27.120 --> 00:03:29.270 align:start position:0% we're recommending keeping that match in the<00:03:27.280> south<00:03:27.680> at<00:03:27.840> 25 00:03:29.270 --> 00:03:29.280 align:start position:0% the south at 25 00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:31.030 align:start position:0% the south at 25 for<00:03:29.519> both<00:03:29.840> the<00:03:30.000> large<00:03:30.319> projects<00:03:30.799> and<00:03:30.959> the 00:03:31.030 --> 00:03:31.040 align:start position:0% for both the large projects and the 00:03:31.040 --> 00:03:32.630 align:start position:0% for both the large projects and the small<00:03:31.440> projects 00:03:32.630 --> 00:03:32.640 align:start position:0% small projects 00:03:32.640 --> 00:03:34.710 align:start position:0% small projects like<00:03:32.879> i<00:03:33.040> say<00:03:33.200> there<00:03:33.519> we<00:03:33.840> considered<00:03:34.319> reducing 00:03:34.710 --> 00:03:34.720 align:start position:0% like i say there we considered reducing 00:03:34.720 --> 00:03:37.110 align:start position:0% like i say there we considered reducing that<00:03:34.879> to<00:03:35.040> 15 00:03:37.110 --> 00:03:37.120 align:start position:0% that to 15 00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:38.710 align:start position:0% that to 15 but<00:03:37.360> again<00:03:37.680> that<00:03:37.920> would 00:03:38.710 --> 00:03:38.720 align:start position:0% but again that would 00:03:38.720 --> 00:03:40.309 align:start position:0% but again that would we<00:03:38.879> would<00:03:39.040> end<00:03:39.200> up<00:03:39.280> spending<00:03:39.680> more<00:03:39.840> money<00:03:40.080> on<00:03:40.239> a 00:03:40.309 --> 00:03:40.319 align:start position:0% we would end up spending more money on a 00:03:40.319 --> 00:03:42.630 align:start position:0% we would end up spending more money on a project<00:03:41.040> less<00:03:41.360> match 00:03:42.630 --> 00:03:42.640 align:start position:0% project less match 00:03:42.640 --> 00:03:44.070 align:start position:0% project less match at<00:03:42.720> the<00:03:42.879> end<00:03:42.959> of<00:03:43.040> the<00:03:43.120> day<00:03:43.360> that<00:03:43.519> would<00:03:43.680> mean<00:03:43.920> we 00:03:44.070 --> 00:03:44.080 align:start position:0% at the end of the day that would mean we 00:03:44.080 --> 00:03:46.309 align:start position:0% at the end of the day that would mean we would<00:03:44.319> fund<00:03:44.879> fewer<00:03:45.280> projects<00:03:45.920> because<00:03:46.159> of 00:03:46.309 --> 00:03:46.319 align:start position:0% would fund fewer projects because of 00:03:46.319 --> 00:03:48.390 align:start position:0% would fund fewer projects because of that<00:03:46.959> and<00:03:47.120> so<00:03:47.360> again<00:03:47.680> we're<00:03:47.840> recommending 00:03:48.390 --> 00:03:48.400 align:start position:0% that and so again we're recommending 00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:52.949 align:start position:0% that and so again we're recommending keeping<00:03:48.720> that<00:03:48.879> at<00:03:49.040> 25 00:03:52.949 --> 00:03:52.959 align:start position:0% 00:03:52.959 --> 00:03:54.710 align:start position:0% we<00:03:53.120> also<00:03:53.439> are<00:03:53.519> recommending<00:03:54.000> eliminating<00:03:54.640> the 00:03:54.710 --> 00:03:54.720 align:start position:0% we also are recommending eliminating the 00:03:54.720 --> 00:03:56.949 align:start position:0% we also are recommending eliminating the 10<00:03:54.959> percent<00:03:55.519> upfront<00:03:56.000> payment<00:03:56.560> to<00:03:56.799> an 00:03:56.949 --> 00:03:56.959 align:start position:0% 10 percent upfront payment to an 00:03:56.959 --> 00:03:59.110 align:start position:0% 10 percent upfront payment to an applicant<00:03:57.920> that's<00:03:58.159> something<00:03:58.560> we<00:03:58.720> have<00:03:58.879> not 00:03:59.110 --> 00:03:59.120 align:start position:0% applicant that's something we have not 00:03:59.120 --> 00:04:01.830 align:start position:0% applicant that's something we have not talked<00:03:59.439> about<00:04:00.159> in<00:04:00.319> the<00:04:00.400> past<00:04:00.720> yet<00:04:01.439> but<00:04:01.599> as 00:04:01.830 --> 00:04:01.840 align:start position:0% talked about in the past yet but as 00:04:01.840 --> 00:04:04.630 align:start position:0% talked about in the past yet but as staff<00:04:02.159> was<00:04:02.319> looking<00:04:02.640> at<00:04:02.799> this 00:04:04.630 --> 00:04:04.640 align:start position:0% staff was looking at this 00:04:04.640 --> 00:04:05.670 align:start position:0% staff was looking at this the<00:04:04.799> 10 00:04:05.670 --> 00:04:05.680 align:start position:0% the 10 00:04:05.680 --> 00:04:07.589 align:start position:0% the 10 on<00:04:05.840> most<00:04:06.159> of<00:04:06.239> these<00:04:06.480> projects<00:04:07.040> is<00:04:07.200> a<00:04:07.280> very 00:04:07.589 --> 00:04:07.599 align:start position:0% on most of these projects is a very 00:04:07.599 --> 00:04:09.670 align:start position:0% on most of these projects is a very fairly<00:04:07.920> small<00:04:08.239> amount<00:04:08.640> even<00:04:08.959> on<00:04:09.040> the<00:04:09.200> maximum 00:04:09.670 --> 00:04:09.680 align:start position:0% fairly small amount even on the maximum 00:04:09.680 --> 00:04:12.550 align:start position:0% fairly small amount even on the maximum project<00:04:10.640> of<00:04:10.799> 75<00:04:11.439> 000 00:04:12.550 --> 00:04:12.560 align:start position:0% project of 75 000 00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:14.229 align:start position:0% project of 75 000 it's<00:04:12.799> only<00:04:13.040> seventy<00:04:13.360> five<00:04:13.599> hundred<00:04:13.840> dollars 00:04:14.229 --> 00:04:14.239 align:start position:0% it's only seventy five hundred dollars 00:04:14.239 --> 00:04:16.469 align:start position:0% it's only seventy five hundred dollars so<00:04:14.400> it<00:04:15.040> it's<00:04:15.280> really<00:04:15.519> not<00:04:15.680> a<00:04:15.760> huge<00:04:16.079> amount<00:04:16.400> to 00:04:16.469 --> 00:04:16.479 align:start position:0% so it it's really not a huge amount to 00:04:16.479 --> 00:04:18.069 align:start position:0% so it it's really not a huge amount to get<00:04:16.639> a<00:04:16.720> project<00:04:17.199> going<00:04:17.600> they're<00:04:17.759> gonna<00:04:17.919> have 00:04:18.069 --> 00:04:18.079 align:start position:0% get a project going they're gonna have 00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:19.830 align:start position:0% get a project going they're gonna have to<00:04:18.160> have<00:04:18.320> their<00:04:18.560> own<00:04:18.720> funding<00:04:19.120> anyway<00:04:19.519> because 00:04:19.830 --> 00:04:19.840 align:start position:0% to have their own funding anyway because 00:04:19.840 --> 00:04:22.230 align:start position:0% to have their own funding anyway because the<00:04:20.000> ninety<00:04:20.320> percent<00:04:21.199> is<00:04:21.359> an<00:04:21.600> after<00:04:21.840> the<00:04:22.000> fact 00:04:22.230 --> 00:04:22.240 align:start position:0% the ninety percent is an after the fact 00:04:22.240 --> 00:04:23.590 align:start position:0% the ninety percent is an after the fact reimbursement 00:04:23.590 --> 00:04:23.600 align:start position:0% reimbursement 00:04:23.600 --> 00:04:25.990 align:start position:0% reimbursement it<00:04:23.759> creates<00:04:24.240> some<00:04:24.479> tracking<00:04:24.960> issues<00:04:25.680> on<00:04:25.840> the 00:04:25.990 --> 00:04:26.000 align:start position:0% it creates some tracking issues on the 00:04:26.000 --> 00:04:27.590 align:start position:0% it creates some tracking issues on the front<00:04:26.240> end<00:04:26.479> for<00:04:26.720> staff 00:04:27.590 --> 00:04:27.600 align:start position:0% front end for staff 00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:30.550 align:start position:0% front end for staff that<00:04:27.840> doesn't<00:04:28.160> seem<00:04:28.400> to<00:04:28.479> be<00:04:28.639> worth<00:04:29.120> the<00:04:29.280> hassle 00:04:30.550 --> 00:04:30.560 align:start position:0% that doesn't seem to be worth the hassle 00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:33.189 align:start position:0% that doesn't seem to be worth the hassle of<00:04:30.720> giving<00:04:30.960> them<00:04:31.199> 10<00:04:31.440> percent 00:04:33.189 --> 00:04:33.199 align:start position:0% of giving them 10 percent 00:04:33.199 --> 00:04:35.350 align:start position:0% of giving them 10 percent the<00:04:33.360> final<00:04:33.759> issue<00:04:34.080> is<00:04:34.320> we've<00:04:34.639> over<00:04:34.880> the<00:04:35.040> past 00:04:35.350 --> 00:04:35.360 align:start position:0% the final issue is we've over the past 00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:37.430 align:start position:0% the final issue is we've over the past two<00:04:35.520> or<00:04:35.680> three<00:04:35.840> years<00:04:36.560> we've<00:04:36.800> had<00:04:36.960> a<00:04:37.040> handful 00:04:37.430 --> 00:04:37.440 align:start position:0% two or three years we've had a handful 00:04:37.440 --> 00:04:38.710 align:start position:0% two or three years we've had a handful of<00:04:37.600> projects 00:04:38.710 --> 00:04:38.720 align:start position:0% of projects 00:04:38.720 --> 00:04:40.950 align:start position:0% of projects where<00:04:39.280> they<00:04:39.600> didn't<00:04:40.320> do<00:04:40.479> what<00:04:40.639> they<00:04:40.800> were 00:04:40.950 --> 00:04:40.960 align:start position:0% where they didn't do what they were 00:04:40.960 --> 00:04:43.270 align:start position:0% where they didn't do what they were supposed<00:04:41.360> to<00:04:41.520> do<00:04:42.240> and<00:04:42.479> then 00:04:43.270 --> 00:04:43.280 align:start position:0% supposed to do and then 00:04:43.280 --> 00:04:45.830 align:start position:0% supposed to do and then it's<00:04:43.759> a<00:04:43.919> it's<00:04:44.160> an<00:04:44.320> ordeal<00:04:44.800> for<00:04:45.040> staff<00:04:45.360> to<00:04:45.600> then 00:04:45.830 --> 00:04:45.840 align:start position:0% it's a it's an ordeal for staff to then 00:04:45.840 --> 00:04:48.550 align:start position:0% it's a it's an ordeal for staff to then go<00:04:46.080> back<00:04:46.800> and<00:04:47.040> ask<00:04:47.280> them<00:04:47.440> for<00:04:47.600> that<00:04:47.759> 10 00:04:48.550 --> 00:04:48.560 align:start position:0% go back and ask them for that 10 00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:49.830 align:start position:0% go back and ask them for that 10 money<00:04:48.880> back 00:04:49.830 --> 00:04:49.840 align:start position:0% money back 00:04:49.840 --> 00:04:51.670 align:start position:0% money back because<00:04:50.080> we<00:04:50.240> had<00:04:50.400> already<00:04:50.880> given<00:04:51.199> it<00:04:51.360> out<00:04:51.520> to 00:04:51.670 --> 00:04:51.680 align:start position:0% because we had already given it out to 00:04:51.680 --> 00:04:53.670 align:start position:0% because we had already given it out to them<00:04:52.240> they<00:04:52.479> didn't<00:04:52.720> do<00:04:52.960> the<00:04:53.040> project<00:04:53.440> like 00:04:53.670 --> 00:04:53.680 align:start position:0% them they didn't do the project like 00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:56.070 align:start position:0% them they didn't do the project like they<00:04:53.840> promised<00:04:54.800> but<00:04:54.960> we<00:04:55.199> spend<00:04:55.440> a<00:04:55.520> lot<00:04:55.680> of<00:04:55.759> time 00:04:56.070 --> 00:04:56.080 align:start position:0% they promised but we spend a lot of time 00:04:56.080 --> 00:04:58.710 align:start position:0% they promised but we spend a lot of time trying<00:04:56.320> to<00:04:56.479> collect<00:04:56.880> that<00:04:57.120> money<00:04:57.840> uh 00:04:58.710 --> 00:04:58.720 align:start position:0% trying to collect that money uh 00:04:58.720 --> 00:04:59.990 align:start position:0% trying to collect that money uh including 00:04:59.990 --> 00:05:00.000 align:start position:0% including 00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:00.710 align:start position:0% including both 00:05:00.710 --> 00:05:00.720 align:start position:0% both 00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:02.230 align:start position:0% both us<00:05:00.960> as<00:05:01.199> staff 00:05:02.230 --> 00:05:02.240 align:start position:0% us as staff 00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:04.150 align:start position:0% us as staff but<00:05:02.400> then<00:05:02.639> also<00:05:03.039> involving<00:05:03.600> legal<00:05:04.000> and 00:05:04.150 --> 00:05:04.160 align:start position:0% but then also involving legal and 00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:05.990 align:start position:0% but then also involving legal and sending<00:05:04.960> letters 00:05:05.990 --> 00:05:06.000 align:start position:0% sending letters 00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:07.590 align:start position:0% sending letters demanding<00:05:06.479> the<00:05:06.560> money<00:05:06.880> back<00:05:07.120> if<00:05:07.280> they<00:05:07.440> don't 00:05:07.590 --> 00:05:07.600 align:start position:0% demanding the money back if they don't 00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:10.790 align:start position:0% demanding the money back if they don't pay<00:05:07.840> it<00:05:08.479> and<00:05:08.720> so<00:05:08.960> i<00:05:09.039> think<00:05:10.000> we<00:05:10.240> think<00:05:10.479> it's 00:05:10.790 --> 00:05:10.800 align:start position:0% pay it and so i think we think it's 00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:13.110 align:start position:0% pay it and so i think we think it's simpler<00:05:11.280> all<00:05:11.440> around<00:05:12.160> and<00:05:12.479> isn't<00:05:12.720> really<00:05:12.960> that 00:05:13.110 --> 00:05:13.120 align:start position:0% simpler all around and isn't really that 00:05:13.120 --> 00:05:15.270 align:start position:0% simpler all around and isn't really that much<00:05:13.360> of<00:05:13.440> a<00:05:13.520> harm<00:05:13.759> to<00:05:13.919> the<00:05:14.080> applicant<00:05:14.880> to<00:05:15.120> just 00:05:15.270 --> 00:05:15.280 align:start position:0% much of a harm to the applicant to just 00:05:15.280 --> 00:05:17.110 align:start position:0% much of a harm to the applicant to just say<00:05:15.520> it's<00:05:15.680> a<00:05:15.759> full<00:05:16.000> reimbursement<00:05:16.880> after 00:05:17.110 --> 00:05:17.120 align:start position:0% say it's a full reimbursement after 00:05:17.120 --> 00:05:21.110 align:start position:0% say it's a full reimbursement after you've<00:05:17.360> done<00:05:17.520> the<00:05:17.680> project 00:05:21.110 --> 00:05:21.120 align:start position:0% 00:05:21.120 --> 00:05:22.790 align:start position:0% we've<00:05:21.360> also<00:05:21.600> eliminated<00:05:22.080> the<00:05:22.160> property<00:05:22.560> tax 00:05:22.790 --> 00:05:22.800 align:start position:0% we've also eliminated the property tax 00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:24.790 align:start position:0% we've also eliminated the property tax abatement<00:05:23.759> option 00:05:24.790 --> 00:05:24.800 align:start position:0% abatement option 00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:26.469 align:start position:0% abatement option that<00:05:24.960> is<00:05:25.120> something<00:05:25.440> that<00:05:25.600> hasn't<00:05:25.919> been<00:05:26.160> used 00:05:26.469 --> 00:05:26.479 align:start position:0% that is something that hasn't been used 00:05:26.479 --> 00:05:28.469 align:start position:0% that is something that hasn't been used in<00:05:26.639> a<00:05:26.720> number<00:05:26.960> of<00:05:27.120> years 00:05:28.469 --> 00:05:28.479 align:start position:0% in a number of years 00:05:28.479 --> 00:05:32.710 align:start position:0% in a number of years staff<00:05:28.880> has<00:05:29.600> recommended<00:05:30.240> against<00:05:30.639> it 00:05:32.710 --> 00:05:32.720 align:start position:0% staff has recommended against it 00:05:32.720 --> 00:05:34.310 align:start position:0% staff has recommended against it partly<00:05:33.199> because<00:05:33.440> it's<00:05:33.680> difficult<00:05:34.160> to 00:05:34.310 --> 00:05:34.320 align:start position:0% partly because it's difficult to 00:05:34.320 --> 00:05:36.629 align:start position:0% partly because it's difficult to estimate<00:05:34.800> the<00:05:34.960> cost<00:05:35.759> so<00:05:35.919> if<00:05:36.000> somebody<00:05:36.400> says 00:05:36.629 --> 00:05:36.639 align:start position:0% estimate the cost so if somebody says 00:05:36.639 --> 00:05:37.909 align:start position:0% estimate the cost so if somebody says i'm<00:05:36.720> going<00:05:36.800> to<00:05:36.880> build<00:05:37.120> a<00:05:37.199> building<00:05:37.520> and<00:05:37.680> i<00:05:37.759> need 00:05:37.909 --> 00:05:37.919 align:start position:0% i'm going to build a building and i need 00:05:37.919 --> 00:05:41.029 align:start position:0% i'm going to build a building and i need 50<00:05:38.320> 000<00:05:38.880> to<00:05:39.039> do<00:05:39.280> it<00:05:39.840> that's<00:05:40.160> easy<00:05:40.400> to<00:05:40.560> track 00:05:41.029 --> 00:05:41.039 align:start position:0% 50 000 to do it that's easy to track 00:05:41.039 --> 00:05:43.189 align:start position:0% 50 000 to do it that's easy to track it's<00:05:41.199> easy<00:05:41.520> to<00:05:41.759> document<00:05:42.400> it's<00:05:42.639> it's<00:05:42.880> easy<00:05:43.120> to 00:05:43.189 --> 00:05:43.199 align:start position:0% it's easy to document it's it's easy to 00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:45.270 align:start position:0% it's easy to document it's it's easy to put<00:05:43.360> in<00:05:43.520> the<00:05:43.600> agreements<00:05:44.560> but<00:05:44.720> if<00:05:44.880> we<00:05:45.039> say 00:05:45.270 --> 00:05:45.280 align:start position:0% put in the agreements but if we say 00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:46.790 align:start position:0% put in the agreements but if we say we're<00:05:45.520> going<00:05:45.759> to 00:05:46.790 --> 00:05:46.800 align:start position:0% we're going to 00:05:46.800 --> 00:05:48.390 align:start position:0% we're going to reimburse<00:05:47.440> you 00:05:48.390 --> 00:05:48.400 align:start position:0% reimburse you 00:05:48.400 --> 00:05:51.909 align:start position:0% reimburse you or<00:05:48.720> abate<00:05:49.199> your<00:05:49.440> taxes<00:05:49.919> for<00:05:50.080> a<00:05:50.160> 10-year<00:05:50.639> period 00:05:51.909 --> 00:05:51.919 align:start position:0% or abate your taxes for a 10-year period 00:05:51.919 --> 00:05:53.990 align:start position:0% or abate your taxes for a 10-year period that's<00:05:52.160> going<00:05:52.240> to<00:05:52.400> vary<00:05:52.880> every<00:05:53.199> year<00:05:53.520> based<00:05:53.840> on 00:05:53.990 --> 00:05:54.000 align:start position:0% that's going to vary every year based on 00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:57.510 align:start position:0% that's going to vary every year based on the<00:05:54.080> taxable<00:05:54.560> value<00:05:54.880> of<00:05:54.960> the<00:05:55.120> property<00:05:56.080> and<00:05:56.240> so 00:05:57.510 --> 00:05:57.520 align:start position:0% the taxable value of the property and so 00:05:57.520 --> 00:06:01.110 align:start position:0% the taxable value of the property and so the<00:05:57.680> way<00:05:58.000> we<00:05:58.400> account<00:05:58.960> for<00:05:59.520> our<00:05:59.759> funding<00:06:00.319> is 00:06:01.110 --> 00:06:01.120 align:start position:0% the way we account for our funding is 00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:03.590 align:start position:0% the way we account for our funding is as<00:06:01.360> soon<00:06:01.600> as<00:06:01.759> you<00:06:02.080> all<00:06:02.319> and<00:06:02.479> the<00:06:02.560> city<00:06:02.880> council 00:06:03.590 --> 00:06:03.600 align:start position:0% as soon as you all and the city council 00:06:03.600 --> 00:06:05.510 align:start position:0% as soon as you all and the city council authorize<00:06:04.160> a<00:06:04.319> project 00:06:05.510 --> 00:06:05.520 align:start position:0% authorize a project 00:06:05.520 --> 00:06:07.670 align:start position:0% authorize a project we<00:06:05.759> take<00:06:06.080> that<00:06:06.240> amount<00:06:06.560> of<00:06:06.720> money<00:06:07.199> out<00:06:07.440> of<00:06:07.520> the 00:06:07.670 --> 00:06:07.680 align:start position:0% we take that amount of money out of the 00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:09.990 align:start position:0% we take that amount of money out of the pot<00:06:08.160> and<00:06:08.400> set<00:06:08.639> it<00:06:08.800> aside 00:06:09.990 --> 00:06:10.000 align:start position:0% pot and set it aside 00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:11.830 align:start position:0% pot and set it aside to<00:06:10.160> be<00:06:10.319> able<00:06:10.479> to<00:06:10.560> pay<00:06:10.800> it<00:06:11.039> at<00:06:11.199> whatever<00:06:11.600> point 00:06:11.830 --> 00:06:11.840 align:start position:0% to be able to pay it at whatever point 00:06:11.840 --> 00:06:13.749 align:start position:0% to be able to pay it at whatever point in<00:06:11.919> the<00:06:12.000> future<00:06:12.400> the<00:06:12.560> applicant<00:06:13.039> comes<00:06:13.360> and 00:06:13.749 --> 00:06:13.759 align:start position:0% in the future the applicant comes and 00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:14.950 align:start position:0% in the future the applicant comes and you<00:06:13.919> know<00:06:14.000> they<00:06:14.160> says<00:06:14.400> they<00:06:14.479> can<00:06:14.720> they 00:06:14.950 --> 00:06:14.960 align:start position:0% you know they says they can they 00:06:14.960 --> 00:06:16.870 align:start position:0% you know they says they can they completed<00:06:15.360> the<00:06:15.520> project<00:06:16.240> so<00:06:16.479> here's<00:06:16.720> your 00:06:16.870 --> 00:06:16.880 align:start position:0% completed the project so here's your 00:06:16.880 --> 00:06:18.550 align:start position:0% completed the project so here's your money 00:06:18.550 --> 00:06:18.560 align:start position:0% money 00:06:18.560 --> 00:06:21.189 align:start position:0% money when<00:06:18.800> we<00:06:18.960> have<00:06:19.199> to<00:06:20.000> look<00:06:20.240> at<00:06:20.400> a<00:06:20.479> 10-year<00:06:20.960> tax 00:06:21.189 --> 00:06:21.199 align:start position:0% when we have to look at a 10-year tax 00:06:21.199 --> 00:06:22.710 align:start position:0% when we have to look at a 10-year tax abatement 00:06:22.710 --> 00:06:22.720 align:start position:0% abatement 00:06:22.720 --> 00:06:24.550 align:start position:0% abatement we<00:06:22.880> can<00:06:23.120> guesstimate<00:06:23.680> it 00:06:24.550 --> 00:06:24.560 align:start position:0% we can guesstimate it 00:06:24.560 --> 00:06:26.230 align:start position:0% we can guesstimate it but<00:06:24.720> then<00:06:24.880> we<00:06:25.039> may<00:06:25.199> be<00:06:25.360> off<00:06:25.600> one<00:06:25.759> way<00:06:25.919> or<00:06:26.080> the 00:06:26.230 --> 00:06:26.240 align:start position:0% but then we may be off one way or the 00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:27.189 align:start position:0% but then we may be off one way or the other 00:06:27.189 --> 00:06:27.199 align:start position:0% other 00:06:27.199 --> 00:06:29.430 align:start position:0% other and<00:06:27.759> back<00:06:28.080> a<00:06:28.160> few<00:06:28.400> years<00:06:28.639> ago<00:06:28.880> when<00:06:29.039> we<00:06:29.199> had 00:06:29.430 --> 00:06:29.440 align:start position:0% and back a few years ago when we had 00:06:29.440 --> 00:06:32.390 align:start position:0% and back a few years ago when we had multiple<00:06:29.919> of<00:06:30.000> those<00:06:30.240> going<00:06:30.639> at<00:06:30.800> once 00:06:32.390 --> 00:06:32.400 align:start position:0% multiple of those going at once 00:06:32.400 --> 00:06:35.430 align:start position:0% multiple of those going at once it<00:06:33.039> really<00:06:33.360> made<00:06:33.759> accounting<00:06:34.319> difficult 00:06:35.430 --> 00:06:35.440 align:start position:0% it really made accounting difficult 00:06:35.440 --> 00:06:37.510 align:start position:0% it really made accounting difficult uh<00:06:35.840> in<00:06:36.000> the<00:06:36.080> long<00:06:36.400> term 00:06:37.510 --> 00:06:37.520 align:start position:0% uh in the long term 00:06:37.520 --> 00:06:39.189 align:start position:0% uh in the long term yeah<00:06:37.759> what's<00:06:37.919> your<00:06:38.400> question<00:06:38.720> i<00:06:38.800> disagree 00:06:39.189 --> 00:06:39.199 align:start position:0% yeah what's your question i disagree 00:06:39.199 --> 00:06:41.670 align:start position:0% yeah what's your question i disagree with<00:06:39.360> you<00:06:39.440> on<00:06:39.520> that<00:06:39.680> we<00:06:39.840> used<00:06:40.080> that<00:06:40.240> last<00:06:40.479> year 00:06:41.670 --> 00:06:41.680 align:start position:0% with you on that we used that last year 00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:50.550 align:start position:0% with you on that we used that last year we<00:06:41.840> used<00:06:42.080> it<00:06:42.160> on<00:06:42.240> the<00:06:42.400> project<00:06:42.800> up<00:06:42.880> here 00:06:50.550 --> 00:06:50.560 align:start position:0% 00:06:50.560 --> 00:06:51.589 align:start position:0% and 00:06:51.589 --> 00:06:51.599 align:start position:0% and 00:06:51.599 --> 00:06:53.670 align:start position:0% and uh<00:06:52.000> that<00:06:52.160> was<00:06:52.319> part<00:06:52.479> of<00:06:52.639> our<00:06:52.800> program<00:06:53.360> that<00:06:53.520> we 00:06:53.670 --> 00:06:53.680 align:start position:0% uh that was part of our program that we 00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:55.909 align:start position:0% uh that was part of our program that we did<00:06:54.240> and<00:06:54.479> it<00:06:54.639> was<00:06:55.280> where<00:06:55.440> they<00:06:55.599> were<00:06:55.759> only 00:06:55.909 --> 00:06:55.919 align:start position:0% did and it was where they were only 00:06:55.919 --> 00:06:57.350 align:start position:0% did and it was where they were only paying<00:06:56.240> a<00:06:56.319> very<00:06:56.479> small 00:06:57.350 --> 00:06:57.360 align:start position:0% paying a very small 00:06:57.360 --> 00:06:58.790 align:start position:0% paying a very small amount<00:06:57.599> of<00:06:57.759> taxes 00:06:58.790 --> 00:06:58.800 align:start position:0% amount of taxes 00:06:58.800 --> 00:07:00.230 align:start position:0% amount of taxes and<00:06:58.960> we<00:06:59.199> gave<00:06:59.440> them 00:07:00.230 --> 00:07:00.240 align:start position:0% and we gave them 00:07:00.240 --> 00:07:02.870 align:start position:0% and we gave them uh<00:07:00.880> something<00:07:01.360> incentive<00:07:01.919> over<00:07:02.240> five<00:07:02.479> years 00:07:02.870 --> 00:07:02.880 align:start position:0% uh something incentive over five years 00:07:02.880 --> 00:07:05.990 align:start position:0% uh something incentive over five years and<00:07:03.440> we<00:07:03.599> made<00:07:03.840> the<00:07:04.000> money<00:07:04.560> back<00:07:04.880> up<00:07:05.199> in 00:07:05.990 --> 00:07:06.000 align:start position:0% and we made the money back up in 00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.150 align:start position:0% and we made the money back up in the<00:07:06.160> first<00:07:06.720> or<00:07:06.960> second<00:07:07.360> year 00:07:08.150 --> 00:07:08.160 align:start position:0% the first or second year 00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:09.430 align:start position:0% the first or second year and<00:07:08.240> by<00:07:08.479> the<00:07:08.479> way<00:07:08.639> up<00:07:08.720> the<00:07:08.880> fifth<00:07:09.039> year<00:07:09.280> they 00:07:09.430 --> 00:07:09.440 align:start position:0% and by the way up the fifth year they 00:07:09.440 --> 00:07:11.990 align:start position:0% and by the way up the fifth year they were<00:07:09.599> paying<00:07:09.840> us<00:07:10.160> many<00:07:10.479> times<00:07:10.880> what<00:07:11.039> we 00:07:11.990 --> 00:07:12.000 align:start position:0% were paying us many times what we 00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:14.070 align:start position:0% were paying us many times what we gave<00:07:12.240> them<00:07:12.479> as<00:07:12.639> an<00:07:12.800> incentive<00:07:13.599> and<00:07:13.759> which 00:07:14.070 --> 00:07:14.080 align:start position:0% gave them as an incentive and which 00:07:14.080 --> 00:07:16.070 align:start position:0% gave them as an incentive and which project<00:07:14.400> was<00:07:14.560> that<00:07:15.120> that<00:07:15.280> was<00:07:15.440> that<00:07:15.840> truck 00:07:16.070 --> 00:07:16.080 align:start position:0% project was that that was that truck 00:07:16.080 --> 00:07:17.510 align:start position:0% project was that that was that truck shop<00:07:16.560> which<00:07:16.720> i<00:07:16.800> came<00:07:17.039> in<00:07:17.120> the<00:07:17.199> name<00:07:17.360> of<00:07:17.440> it 00:07:17.510 --> 00:07:17.520 align:start position:0% shop which i came in the name of it 00:07:17.520 --> 00:07:18.870 align:start position:0% shop which i came in the name of it where<00:07:17.680> they<00:07:17.759> have<00:07:17.919> their<00:07:18.319> they're<00:07:18.560> doing<00:07:18.800> the 00:07:18.870 --> 00:07:18.880 align:start position:0% where they have their they're doing the 00:07:18.880 --> 00:07:20.710 align:start position:0% where they have their they're doing the new<00:07:19.039> restaurant<00:07:19.840> i<00:07:20.000> don't<00:07:20.080> know<00:07:20.479> yeah<00:07:20.639> the 00:07:20.710 --> 00:07:20.720 align:start position:0% new restaurant i don't know yeah the 00:07:20.720 --> 00:07:23.189 align:start position:0% new restaurant i don't know yeah the huddle<00:07:20.960> house<00:07:21.280> and<00:07:21.520> everything 00:07:23.189 --> 00:07:23.199 align:start position:0% huddle house and everything 00:07:23.199 --> 00:07:25.270 align:start position:0% huddle house and everything on<00:07:23.280> that<00:07:23.520> property<00:07:24.240> okay<00:07:24.720> yeah<00:07:24.880> i<00:07:24.960> didn't 00:07:25.270 --> 00:07:25.280 align:start position:0% on that property okay yeah i didn't 00:07:25.280 --> 00:07:28.230 align:start position:0% on that property okay yeah i didn't remember<00:07:25.599> that<00:07:26.000> um 00:07:28.230 --> 00:07:28.240 align:start position:0% remember that um 00:07:28.240 --> 00:07:29.990 align:start position:0% remember that um i'm<00:07:28.479> so<00:07:28.800> sure<00:07:29.039> that's<00:07:29.360> that's<00:07:29.599> going<00:07:29.680> to<00:07:29.759> be<00:07:29.919> a 00:07:29.990 --> 00:07:30.000 align:start position:0% i'm so sure that's that's going to be a 00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:32.309 align:start position:0% i'm so sure that's that's going to be a big<00:07:30.240> project<00:07:30.560> but<00:07:30.720> it<00:07:31.199> it<00:07:31.360> was<00:07:31.599> a 00:07:32.309 --> 00:07:32.319 align:start position:0% big project but it it was a 00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:34.230 align:start position:0% big project but it it was a you<00:07:32.479> know<00:07:32.560> if<00:07:32.720> you<00:07:33.039> the<00:07:33.280> numbers 00:07:34.230 --> 00:07:34.240 align:start position:0% you know if you the numbers 00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:37.589 align:start position:0% you know if you the numbers that<00:07:34.400> y'all<00:07:34.720> presented<00:07:35.199> to<00:07:35.360> us<00:07:35.759> deficit 00:07:37.589 --> 00:07:37.599 align:start position:0% that y'all presented to us deficit 00:07:37.599 --> 00:07:39.990 align:start position:0% that y'all presented to us deficit that<00:07:38.000> we're<00:07:38.160> getting<00:07:38.720> way<00:07:39.199> more<00:07:39.520> back<00:07:39.840> than 00:07:39.990 --> 00:07:40.000 align:start position:0% that we're getting way more back than 00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:44.710 align:start position:0% that we're getting way more back than what<00:07:40.240> we<00:07:40.639> put<00:07:40.880> out<00:07:41.039> in<00:07:41.120> that<00:07:41.360> project 00:07:44.710 --> 00:07:44.720 align:start position:0% 00:07:44.720 --> 00:07:47.350 align:start position:0% okay<00:07:45.199> well<00:07:45.440> and<00:07:45.599> if<00:07:45.919> if<00:07:46.080> that's<00:07:46.319> the<00:07:46.479> board 00:07:47.350 --> 00:07:47.360 align:start position:0% okay well and if if that's the board 00:07:47.360 --> 00:07:49.350 align:start position:0% okay well and if if that's the board leaning<00:07:47.759> is<00:07:47.919> to<00:07:48.080> keep<00:07:48.319> that<00:07:48.560> in 00:07:49.350 --> 00:07:49.360 align:start position:0% leaning is to keep that in 00:07:49.360 --> 00:07:51.510 align:start position:0% leaning is to keep that in um<00:07:49.759> i<00:07:49.919> think<00:07:50.160> staff's<00:07:50.560> position<00:07:51.039> is<00:07:51.120> we<00:07:51.280> would 00:07:51.510 --> 00:07:51.520 align:start position:0% um i think staff's position is we would 00:07:51.520 --> 00:07:54.309 align:start position:0% um i think staff's position is we would generally<00:07:52.160> still<00:07:52.800> recommend<00:07:53.280> against<00:07:53.680> it<00:07:54.160> but 00:07:54.309 --> 00:07:54.319 align:start position:0% generally still recommend against it but 00:07:54.319 --> 00:07:55.990 align:start position:0% generally still recommend against it but you're<00:07:54.479> right<00:07:54.720> there<00:07:54.879> may<00:07:55.039> be<00:07:55.199> a<00:07:55.280> project<00:07:55.759> like 00:07:55.990 --> 00:07:56.000 align:start position:0% you're right there may be a project like 00:07:56.000 --> 00:07:57.189 align:start position:0% you're right there may be a project like that<00:07:56.240> where 00:07:57.189 --> 00:07:57.199 align:start position:0% that where 00:07:57.199 --> 00:07:59.029 align:start position:0% that where it<00:07:57.360> does<00:07:57.520> make<00:07:57.759> sense<00:07:58.160> that's<00:07:58.319> the<00:07:58.400> only<00:07:58.560> one 00:07:59.029 --> 00:07:59.039 align:start position:0% it does make sense that's the only one 00:07:59.039 --> 00:08:01.029 align:start position:0% it does make sense that's the only one i've<00:07:59.120> been<00:07:59.280> on<00:07:59.440> the<00:07:59.520> board 00:08:01.029 --> 00:08:01.039 align:start position:0% i've been on the board 00:08:01.039 --> 00:08:03.029 align:start position:0% i've been on the board that's<00:08:01.280> the<00:08:01.360> only<00:08:01.520> one<00:08:01.680> we've<00:08:01.840> done<00:08:02.160> but<00:08:02.800> that 00:08:03.029 --> 00:08:03.039 align:start position:0% that's the only one we've done but that 00:08:03.039 --> 00:08:03.990 align:start position:0% that's the only one we've done but that one 00:08:03.990 --> 00:08:04.000 align:start position:0% one 00:08:04.000 --> 00:08:05.749 align:start position:0% one to<00:08:04.160> me<00:08:04.319> was<00:08:04.479> a<00:08:04.560> no-brainer<00:08:05.120> because<00:08:05.520> we 00:08:05.749 --> 00:08:05.759 align:start position:0% to me was a no-brainer because we 00:08:05.759 --> 00:08:07.589 align:start position:0% to me was a no-brainer because we brought<00:08:06.080> so<00:08:06.319> much<00:08:06.560> tax<00:08:06.879> back<00:08:07.120> in<00:08:07.360> the<00:08:07.440> first 00:08:07.589 --> 00:08:07.599 align:start position:0% brought so much tax back in the first 00:08:07.599 --> 00:08:09.029 align:start position:0% brought so much tax back in the first one<00:08:07.840> i've<00:08:08.080> seen 00:08:09.029 --> 00:08:09.039 align:start position:0% one i've seen 00:08:09.039 --> 00:08:13.589 align:start position:0% one i've seen that<00:08:09.360> that<00:08:09.520> was<00:08:09.680> presented<00:08:10.080> to<00:08:10.240> us<00:08:10.319> but<00:08:10.560> it 00:08:13.589 --> 00:08:13.599 align:start position:0% 00:08:13.599 --> 00:08:15.510 align:start position:0% by<00:08:13.759> then<00:08:13.919> developing<00:08:14.400> that<00:08:14.639> land<00:08:14.960> versus<00:08:15.360> what 00:08:15.510 --> 00:08:15.520 align:start position:0% by then developing that land versus what 00:08:15.520 --> 00:08:16.309 align:start position:0% by then developing that land versus what we 00:08:16.309 --> 00:08:16.319 align:start position:0% we 00:08:16.319 --> 00:08:19.430 align:start position:0% we what<00:08:16.479> we<00:08:16.639> were<00:08:16.800> getting<00:08:17.120> in<00:08:17.199> tax<00:08:17.599> base 00:08:19.430 --> 00:08:19.440 align:start position:0% what we were getting in tax base 00:08:19.440 --> 00:08:21.830 align:start position:0% what we were getting in tax base sure<00:08:19.840> before<00:08:20.160> it<00:08:20.240> was<00:08:20.400> developed<00:08:21.280> well<00:08:21.520> and<00:08:21.680> i 00:08:21.830 --> 00:08:21.840 align:start position:0% sure before it was developed well and i 00:08:21.840 --> 00:08:23.350 align:start position:0% sure before it was developed well and i think<00:08:22.240> many<00:08:22.479> times<00:08:22.720> a<00:08:22.720> lot<00:08:22.879> of<00:08:22.960> money<00:08:23.199> we<00:08:23.280> got 00:08:23.350 --> 00:08:23.360 align:start position:0% think many times a lot of money we got 00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:24.469 align:start position:0% think many times a lot of money we got it<00:08:23.440> back 00:08:24.469 --> 00:08:24.479 align:start position:0% it back 00:08:24.479 --> 00:08:27.830 align:start position:0% it back i<00:08:24.639> think<00:08:24.879> our<00:08:25.599> preference<00:08:26.160> was<00:08:26.479> to<00:08:26.720> keep<00:08:26.960> it 00:08:27.830 --> 00:08:27.840 align:start position:0% i think our preference was to keep it 00:08:27.840 --> 00:08:29.510 align:start position:0% i think our preference was to keep it we'd<00:08:28.080> rather<00:08:28.720> instead<00:08:29.039> of<00:08:29.199> funding<00:08:29.440> the 00:08:29.510 --> 00:08:29.520 align:start position:0% we'd rather instead of funding the 00:08:29.520 --> 00:08:33.029 align:start position:0% we'd rather instead of funding the property<00:08:29.919> tax<00:08:30.240> we<00:08:30.400> would<00:08:30.560> rather<00:08:30.960> fund 00:08:33.029 --> 00:08:33.039 align:start position:0% property tax we would rather fund 00:08:33.039 --> 00:08:35.029 align:start position:0% property tax we would rather fund all<00:08:33.279> of<00:08:33.440> the<00:08:33.599> maximum<00:08:34.080> we<00:08:34.240> can<00:08:34.399> give<00:08:34.640> to<00:08:34.800> one 00:08:35.029 --> 00:08:35.039 align:start position:0% all of the maximum we can give to one 00:08:35.039 --> 00:08:36.149 align:start position:0% all of the maximum we can give to one project 00:08:36.149 --> 00:08:36.159 align:start position:0% project 00:08:36.159 --> 00:08:38.389 align:start position:0% project on<00:08:36.399> hard<00:08:36.719> costs<00:08:37.120> that<00:08:37.279> we<00:08:37.360> can<00:08:37.519> define<00:08:38.000> upfront 00:08:38.389 --> 00:08:38.399 align:start position:0% on hard costs that we can define upfront 00:08:38.399 --> 00:08:41.750 align:start position:0% on hard costs that we can define upfront what<00:08:38.560> those<00:08:38.800> costs<00:08:39.200> are 00:08:41.750 --> 00:08:41.760 align:start position:0% what those costs are 00:08:41.760 --> 00:08:43.589 align:start position:0% what those costs are rather<00:08:42.080> than<00:08:42.399> something<00:08:42.800> that's<00:08:43.039> variable 00:08:43.589 --> 00:08:43.599 align:start position:0% rather than something that's variable 00:08:43.599 --> 00:08:45.590 align:start position:0% rather than something that's variable and<00:08:43.760> may<00:08:44.000> change<00:08:44.320> over<00:08:44.640> time 00:08:45.590 --> 00:08:45.600 align:start position:0% and may change over time 00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:46.710 align:start position:0% and may change over time um 00:08:46.710 --> 00:08:46.720 align:start position:0% um 00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:47.829 align:start position:0% um but<00:08:46.959> again 00:08:47.829 --> 00:08:47.839 align:start position:0% but again 00:08:47.839 --> 00:08:50.230 align:start position:0% but again if<00:08:48.000> you<00:08:48.240> all<00:08:48.720> lean<00:08:48.959> towards<00:08:49.279> keeping<00:08:49.600> that 00:08:50.230 --> 00:08:50.240 align:start position:0% if you all lean towards keeping that 00:08:50.240 --> 00:08:56.940 align:start position:0% if you all lean towards keeping that we're<00:08:50.399> happy<00:08:50.720> to<00:08:51.360> keep<00:08:51.600> that<00:08:51.839> in<00:08:52.399> one<00:08:52.640> voice 00:08:56.940 --> 00:08:56.950 align:start position:0% 00:08:56.950 --> 00:09:04.070 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:09:04.070 --> 00:09:04.080 align:start position:0% 00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:05.990 align:start position:0% and<00:09:04.240> i'm<00:09:04.320> thinking<00:09:04.640> more<00:09:04.800> for<00:09:04.959> the<00:09:05.120> future 00:09:05.990 --> 00:09:06.000 align:start position:0% and i'm thinking more for the future 00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:08.230 align:start position:0% and i'm thinking more for the future there's<00:09:06.240> going<00:09:06.320> to<00:09:06.399> be<00:09:06.480> a<00:09:06.560> lot<00:09:06.720> more<00:09:06.959> of<00:09:07.040> those 00:09:08.230 --> 00:09:08.240 align:start position:0% there's going to be a lot more of those 00:09:08.240 --> 00:09:10.230 align:start position:0% there's going to be a lot more of those businesses<00:09:08.800> opening<00:09:09.120> up 00:09:10.230 --> 00:09:10.240 align:start position:0% businesses opening up 00:09:10.240 --> 00:09:11.910 align:start position:0% businesses opening up especially<00:09:10.720> considering<00:09:11.200> the<00:09:11.440> interstate 00:09:11.910 --> 00:09:11.920 align:start position:0% especially considering the interstate 00:09:11.920 --> 00:09:13.430 align:start position:0% especially considering the interstate isn't<00:09:12.160> that<00:09:12.320> coming<00:09:12.560> through 00:09:13.430 --> 00:09:13.440 align:start position:0% isn't that coming through 00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:15.430 align:start position:0% isn't that coming through there<00:09:13.680> may<00:09:13.839> be<00:09:14.399> we<00:09:14.560> don't<00:09:14.720> have<00:09:14.959> a<00:09:15.040> plan<00:09:15.279> in<00:09:15.360> the 00:09:15.430 --> 00:09:15.440 align:start position:0% there may be we don't have a plan in the 00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:17.350 align:start position:0% there may be we don't have a plan in the south<00:09:15.680> to<00:09:15.760> ever<00:09:16.000> do<00:09:16.160> that<00:09:16.480> yeah<00:09:16.880> but<00:09:17.120> in<00:09:17.279> the 00:09:17.350 --> 00:09:17.360 align:start position:0% south to ever do that yeah but in the 00:09:17.360 --> 00:09:19.190 align:start position:0% south to ever do that yeah but in the north<00:09:17.760> we<00:09:17.920> have<00:09:18.160> options 00:09:19.190 --> 00:09:19.200 align:start position:0% north we have options 00:09:19.200 --> 00:09:21.269 align:start position:0% north we have options so<00:09:19.440> would<00:09:19.600> you<00:09:19.839> all<00:09:20.000> be<00:09:20.160> comfortable<00:09:20.959> making 00:09:21.269 --> 00:09:21.279 align:start position:0% so would you all be comfortable making 00:09:21.279 --> 00:09:23.829 align:start position:0% so would you all be comfortable making it<00:09:21.440> a<00:09:21.600> north<00:09:21.920> only 00:09:23.829 --> 00:09:23.839 align:start position:0% it a north only 00:09:23.839 --> 00:09:25.670 align:start position:0% it a north only and<00:09:24.080> i<00:09:24.160> think<00:09:24.399> you<00:09:24.560> might<00:09:24.800> want<00:09:24.959> to<00:09:25.040> modify<00:09:25.519> it 00:09:25.670 --> 00:09:25.680 align:start position:0% and i think you might want to modify it 00:09:25.680 --> 00:09:27.590 align:start position:0% and i think you might want to modify it a little<00:09:25.839> bit<00:09:26.480> you<00:09:26.640> might<00:09:26.880> want<00:09:27.040> to<00:09:27.279> say 00:09:27.590 --> 00:09:27.600 align:start position:0% a little bit you might want to say 00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:28.949 align:start position:0% a little bit you might want to say something<00:09:28.160> that 00:09:28.949 --> 00:09:28.959 align:start position:0% something that 00:09:28.959 --> 00:09:31.509 align:start position:0% something that tax<00:09:29.279> abatement<00:09:29.760> may<00:09:30.000> be<00:09:30.240> considered<00:09:31.120> based 00:09:31.509 --> 00:09:31.519 align:start position:0% tax abatement may be considered based 00:09:31.519 --> 00:09:34.710 align:start position:0% tax abatement may be considered based upon<00:09:32.240> yeah<00:09:32.480> the<00:09:32.640> project<00:09:33.360> the<00:09:33.600> size<00:09:34.160> and<00:09:34.320> the 00:09:34.710 --> 00:09:34.720 align:start position:0% upon yeah the project the size and the 00:09:34.720 --> 00:09:37.190 align:start position:0% upon yeah the project the size and the and<00:09:34.880> the<00:09:35.040> scope<00:09:35.440> of<00:09:35.519> the<00:09:35.760> project 00:09:37.190 --> 00:09:37.200 align:start position:0% and the scope of the project 00:09:37.200 --> 00:09:39.350 align:start position:0% and the scope of the project or<00:09:37.360> something<00:09:37.760> that<00:09:38.000> makes<00:09:38.320> it<00:09:38.720> in<00:09:38.880> the<00:09:38.959> return 00:09:39.350 --> 00:09:39.360 align:start position:0% or something that makes it in the return 00:09:39.360 --> 00:09:40.470 align:start position:0% or something that makes it in the return to<00:09:39.519> the<00:09:39.600> city 00:09:40.470 --> 00:09:40.480 align:start position:0% to the city 00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:42.790 align:start position:0% to the city if<00:09:40.640> you<00:09:40.720> leave<00:09:40.880> it<00:09:41.040> as<00:09:41.200> an<00:09:41.360> option<00:09:42.000> yeah<00:09:42.640> you 00:09:42.790 --> 00:09:42.800 align:start position:0% if you leave it as an option yeah you 00:09:42.800 --> 00:09:44.710 align:start position:0% if you leave it as an option yeah you can<00:09:43.120> do 00:09:44.710 --> 00:09:44.720 align:start position:0% can do 00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:47.110 align:start position:0% can do but<00:09:45.120> that's<00:09:45.440> not<00:09:45.600> generally<00:09:46.000> the<00:09:46.240> preference 00:09:47.110 --> 00:09:47.120 align:start position:0% but that's not generally the preference 00:09:47.120 --> 00:09:49.910 align:start position:0% but that's not generally the preference right<00:09:47.680> unless<00:09:48.000> it's<00:09:48.160> a<00:09:48.320> special<00:09:48.720> project 00:09:49.910 --> 00:09:49.920 align:start position:0% right unless it's a special project 00:09:49.920 --> 00:09:52.230 align:start position:0% right unless it's a special project and<00:09:50.000> if<00:09:50.160> i<00:09:50.320> can<00:09:50.480> weigh<00:09:50.720> in<00:09:51.200> um<00:09:51.760> on<00:09:51.920> that 00:09:52.230 --> 00:09:52.240 align:start position:0% and if i can weigh in um on that 00:09:52.240 --> 00:09:53.990 align:start position:0% and if i can weigh in um on that particular<00:09:52.880> project 00:09:53.990 --> 00:09:54.000 align:start position:0% particular project 00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:56.630 align:start position:0% particular project john<00:09:54.480> had<00:09:55.040> shannon<00:09:55.440> scott<00:09:55.839> my<00:09:56.080> predecessor 00:09:56.630 --> 00:09:56.640 align:start position:0% john had shannon scott my predecessor 00:09:56.640 --> 00:09:59.509 align:start position:0% john had shannon scott my predecessor from<00:09:56.880> economic<00:09:57.360> development<00:09:58.240> she<00:09:58.480> ran<00:09:59.200> some 00:09:59.509 --> 00:09:59.519 align:start position:0% from economic development she ran some 00:09:59.519 --> 00:10:01.910 align:start position:0% from economic development she ran some economic<00:10:00.080> impact<00:10:00.560> for<00:10:00.800> that<00:10:01.200> and<00:10:01.360> it<00:10:01.440> was<00:10:01.680> just 00:10:01.910 --> 00:10:01.920 align:start position:0% economic impact for that and it was just 00:10:01.920 --> 00:10:04.069 align:start position:0% economic impact for that and it was just like<00:10:02.079> you<00:10:02.240> said<00:10:02.480> the<00:10:02.640> scale<00:10:03.040> of<00:10:03.120> that<00:10:03.360> project 00:10:04.069 --> 00:10:04.079 align:start position:0% like you said the scale of that project 00:10:04.079 --> 00:10:06.470 align:start position:0% like you said the scale of that project so<00:10:04.240> i<00:10:04.399> think<00:10:04.800> the<00:10:05.040> way<00:10:05.200> that<00:10:05.360> you<00:10:05.600> proposed 00:10:06.470 --> 00:10:06.480 align:start position:0% so i think the way that you proposed 00:10:06.480 --> 00:10:09.509 align:start position:0% so i think the way that you proposed treating<00:10:06.800> it<00:10:06.880> is<00:10:07.040> almost<00:10:07.279> like<00:10:07.519> a<00:10:07.680> separate 00:10:09.509 --> 00:10:09.519 align:start position:0% treating it is almost like a separate 00:10:09.519 --> 00:10:12.310 align:start position:0% treating it is almost like a separate a<00:10:09.760> separate<00:10:10.320> not<00:10:10.640> separate<00:10:11.040> application<00:10:12.079> but 00:10:12.310 --> 00:10:12.320 align:start position:0% a separate not separate application but 00:10:12.320 --> 00:10:13.990 align:start position:0% a separate not separate application but consider<00:10:12.800> that<00:10:13.040> separately<00:10:13.519> from<00:10:13.680> the<00:10:13.760> rest 00:10:13.990 --> 00:10:14.000 align:start position:0% consider that separately from the rest 00:10:14.000 --> 00:10:15.670 align:start position:0% consider that separately from the rest of<00:10:14.079> the<00:10:14.240> project<00:10:14.800> i<00:10:14.880> think<00:10:15.120> is<00:10:15.279> probably<00:10:15.519> the 00:10:15.670 --> 00:10:15.680 align:start position:0% of the project i think is probably the 00:10:15.680 --> 00:10:17.430 align:start position:0% of the project i think is probably the most<00:10:15.920> effective<00:10:16.240> way<00:10:16.399> to<00:10:16.560> do<00:10:16.720> it<00:10:17.040> and<00:10:17.200> i<00:10:17.279> think 00:10:17.430 --> 00:10:17.440 align:start position:0% most effective way to do it and i think 00:10:17.440 --> 00:10:18.710 align:start position:0% most effective way to do it and i think you're<00:10:17.600> right<00:10:17.920> we're<00:10:18.079> not<00:10:18.240> going<00:10:18.320> to<00:10:18.480> see<00:10:18.640> a 00:10:18.710 --> 00:10:18.720 align:start position:0% you're right we're not going to see a 00:10:18.720 --> 00:10:20.470 align:start position:0% you're right we're not going to see a lot<00:10:18.880> of<00:10:18.959> that<00:10:19.200> interest<00:10:19.519> in<00:10:19.600> the<00:10:19.760> south<00:10:20.320> just 00:10:20.470 --> 00:10:20.480 align:start position:0% lot of that interest in the south just 00:10:20.480 --> 00:10:22.790 align:start position:0% lot of that interest in the south just by<00:10:20.640> the<00:10:20.800> nature<00:10:21.120> of<00:10:21.279> how<00:10:21.440> the<00:10:21.760> south<00:10:22.240> is 00:10:22.790 --> 00:10:22.800 align:start position:0% by the nature of how the south is 00:10:22.800 --> 00:10:24.150 align:start position:0% by the nature of how the south is whereas<00:10:23.120> the<00:10:23.279> north<00:10:23.600> that<00:10:23.839> type<00:10:24.000> of 00:10:24.150 --> 00:10:24.160 align:start position:0% whereas the north that type of 00:10:24.160 --> 00:10:26.550 align:start position:0% whereas the north that type of industrial<00:10:24.720> development<00:10:25.600> is<00:10:25.839> more<00:10:26.160> apparent 00:10:26.550 --> 00:10:26.560 align:start position:0% industrial development is more apparent 00:10:26.560 --> 00:10:28.790 align:start position:0% industrial development is more apparent in<00:10:26.640> the<00:10:26.720> north<00:10:27.200> so<00:10:27.360> i<00:10:27.440> think<00:10:27.600> that<00:10:27.760> that's 00:10:28.790 --> 00:10:28.800 align:start position:0% in the north so i think that that's 00:10:28.800 --> 00:10:31.750 align:start position:0% in the north so i think that that's a<00:10:29.120> really<00:10:29.440> responsible<00:10:29.920> way<00:10:30.079> to<00:10:30.160> go<00:10:30.240> about<00:10:30.480> it 00:10:31.750 --> 00:10:31.760 align:start position:0% a really responsible way to go about it 00:10:31.760 --> 00:10:34.069 align:start position:0% a really responsible way to go about it yeah<00:10:31.920> we<00:10:32.079> can<00:10:32.399> we<00:10:32.480> can<00:10:32.720> look<00:10:32.959> at<00:10:33.440> yeah<00:10:33.760> we<00:10:33.920> can 00:10:34.069 --> 00:10:34.079 align:start position:0% yeah we can we can look at yeah we can 00:10:34.079 --> 00:10:36.069 align:start position:0% yeah we can we can look at yeah we can look<00:10:34.320> at<00:10:34.480> bringing<00:10:34.720> that<00:10:34.959> back<00:10:35.279> and<00:10:35.519> and 00:10:36.069 --> 00:10:36.079 align:start position:0% look at bringing that back and and 00:10:36.079 --> 00:10:37.670 align:start position:0% look at bringing that back and and keeping<00:10:36.399> it<00:10:36.560> in<00:10:36.720> but<00:10:36.880> maybe<00:10:37.120> looking<00:10:37.440> at<00:10:37.519> how 00:10:37.670 --> 00:10:37.680 align:start position:0% keeping it in but maybe looking at how 00:10:37.680 --> 00:10:39.190 align:start position:0% keeping it in but maybe looking at how we<00:10:37.839> word<00:10:38.160> that 00:10:39.190 --> 00:10:39.200 align:start position:0% we word that 00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:41.110 align:start position:0% we word that and<00:10:39.279> maybe<00:10:39.600> bringing<00:10:39.920> it<00:10:40.000> back<00:10:40.160> to<00:10:40.320> you<00:10:40.480> all<00:10:40.959> i 00:10:41.110 --> 00:10:41.120 align:start position:0% and maybe bringing it back to you all i 00:10:41.120 --> 00:10:42.550 align:start position:0% and maybe bringing it back to you all i think<00:10:41.279> you<00:10:41.440> need<00:10:41.600> to<00:10:41.680> bring<00:10:41.920> it<00:10:42.000> back<00:10:42.240> you<00:10:42.399> just 00:10:42.550 --> 00:10:42.560 align:start position:0% think you need to bring it back you just 00:10:42.560 --> 00:10:44.230 align:start position:0% think you need to bring it back you just need<00:10:42.800> to<00:10:42.959> modify<00:10:43.360> your<00:10:43.600> statement<00:10:44.079> and 00:10:44.230 --> 00:10:44.240 align:start position:0% need to modify your statement and 00:10:44.240 --> 00:10:45.990 align:start position:0% need to modify your statement and include<00:10:44.560> it<00:10:44.720> and<00:10:45.040> if<00:10:45.279> the<00:10:45.360> board<00:10:45.600> has<00:10:45.680> agreed 00:10:45.990 --> 00:10:46.000 align:start position:0% include it and if the board has agreed 00:10:46.000 --> 00:10:48.069 align:start position:0% include it and if the board has agreed to<00:10:46.640> give<00:10:46.880> the<00:10:47.040> staff<00:10:47.279> authority<00:10:47.680> to<00:10:47.760> draw<00:10:47.920> it 00:10:48.069 --> 00:10:48.079 align:start position:0% to give the staff authority to draw it 00:10:48.079 --> 00:10:49.030 align:start position:0% to give the staff authority to draw it up 00:10:49.030 --> 00:10:49.040 align:start position:0% up 00:10:49.040 --> 00:10:51.269 align:start position:0% up okay<00:10:49.600> we<00:10:49.760> could<00:10:49.920> do<00:10:50.079> that 00:10:51.269 --> 00:10:51.279 align:start position:0% okay we could do that 00:10:51.279 --> 00:10:53.670 align:start position:0% okay we could do that i<00:10:51.440> should<00:10:51.600> mention<00:10:52.079> the<00:10:52.320> next<00:10:52.560> step<00:10:52.880> of<00:10:52.959> this 00:10:53.670 --> 00:10:53.680 align:start position:0% i should mention the next step of this 00:10:53.680 --> 00:10:55.110 align:start position:0% i should mention the next step of this these<00:10:53.920> have<00:10:54.079> to<00:10:54.160> be<00:10:54.240> approved<00:10:54.560> by<00:10:54.720> the<00:10:54.880> city 00:10:55.110 --> 00:10:55.120 align:start position:0% these have to be approved by the city 00:10:55.120 --> 00:10:57.269 align:start position:0% these have to be approved by the city council<00:10:55.600> so<00:10:56.240> if<00:10:56.399> you<00:10:56.560> guys<00:10:56.800> are<00:10:56.880> comfortable 00:10:57.269 --> 00:10:57.279 align:start position:0% council so if you guys are comfortable 00:10:57.279 --> 00:10:58.790 align:start position:0% council so if you guys are comfortable with<00:10:57.440> it<00:10:57.519> today<00:10:57.920> we<00:10:58.079> can<00:10:58.240> move<00:10:58.399> it<00:10:58.560> on<00:10:58.640> to<00:10:58.720> the 00:10:58.790 --> 00:10:58.800 align:start position:0% with it today we can move it on to the 00:10:58.800 --> 00:11:01.030 align:start position:0% with it today we can move it on to the city<00:10:59.040> council<00:10:59.920> or 00:11:01.030 --> 00:11:01.040 align:start position:0% city council or 00:11:01.040 --> 00:11:02.470 align:start position:0% city council or after<00:11:01.279> we<00:11:01.440> get<00:11:01.600> through<00:11:01.839> all<00:11:01.920> of<00:11:02.000> this<00:11:02.240> if<00:11:02.399> you 00:11:02.470 --> 00:11:02.480 align:start position:0% after we get through all of this if you 00:11:02.480 --> 00:11:04.870 align:start position:0% after we get through all of this if you guys<00:11:02.720> want<00:11:02.880> to<00:11:03.040> see<00:11:03.200> that<00:11:03.839> a<00:11:04.000> revised<00:11:04.480> draft<00:11:04.720> at 00:11:04.870 --> 00:11:04.880 align:start position:0% guys want to see that a revised draft at 00:11:04.880 --> 00:11:06.949 align:start position:0% guys want to see that a revised draft at your<00:11:05.040> next<00:11:05.200> meeting<00:11:05.519> we<00:11:05.600> can<00:11:05.760> do<00:11:05.839> that<00:11:06.079> as<00:11:06.240> well 00:11:06.949 --> 00:11:06.959 align:start position:0% your next meeting we can do that as well 00:11:06.959 --> 00:11:08.550 align:start position:0% your next meeting we can do that as well but<00:11:07.120> we<00:11:07.279> can<00:11:07.600> we<00:11:07.760> can<00:11:07.839> talk<00:11:08.079> about<00:11:08.240> that<00:11:08.480> we'll 00:11:08.550 --> 00:11:08.560 align:start position:0% but we can we can talk about that we'll 00:11:08.560 --> 00:11:10.069 align:start position:0% but we can we can talk about that we'll get<00:11:08.720> everything<00:11:09.040> else<00:11:09.200> done<00:11:09.600> that<00:11:09.839> one 00:11:10.069 --> 00:11:10.079 align:start position:0% get everything else done that one 00:11:10.079 --> 00:11:11.509 align:start position:0% get everything else done that one statement<00:11:10.480> we<00:11:10.640> can<00:11:10.800> handle<00:11:11.040> that<00:11:11.200> in<00:11:11.360> our 00:11:11.509 --> 00:11:11.519 align:start position:0% statement we can handle that in our 00:11:11.519 --> 00:11:22.150 align:start position:0% statement we can handle that in our meeting<00:11:11.760> on<00:11:11.839> the<00:11:11.920> 25th<00:11:12.480> and 00:11:22.150 --> 00:11:22.160 align:start position:0% 00:11:22.160 --> 00:11:24.630 align:start position:0% this<00:11:22.320> was<00:11:22.480> one<00:11:22.720> we<00:11:22.880> talked<00:11:23.120> about<00:11:23.519> a<00:11:24.399> fair 00:11:24.630 --> 00:11:24.640 align:start position:0% this was one we talked about a fair 00:11:24.640 --> 00:11:26.150 align:start position:0% this was one we talked about a fair amount<00:11:25.040> at<00:11:25.120> the<00:11:25.279> last<00:11:25.519> meeting<00:11:25.920> and<00:11:26.000> the 00:11:26.150 --> 00:11:26.160 align:start position:0% amount at the last meeting and the 00:11:26.160 --> 00:11:28.630 align:start position:0% amount at the last meeting and the direction<00:11:26.640> from<00:11:26.880> the<00:11:27.040> board<00:11:27.440> was<00:11:27.760> to 00:11:28.630 --> 00:11:28.640 align:start position:0% direction from the board was to 00:11:28.640 --> 00:11:31.750 align:start position:0% direction from the board was to proceed<00:11:29.279> with<00:11:29.519> this<00:11:29.760> prioritization<00:11:31.200> uh<00:11:31.519> so 00:11:31.750 --> 00:11:31.760 align:start position:0% proceed with this prioritization uh so 00:11:31.760 --> 00:11:33.750 align:start position:0% proceed with this prioritization uh so looking<00:11:32.160> as<00:11:32.560> as<00:11:32.800> we<00:11:33.040> weigh<00:11:33.279> properties 00:11:33.750 --> 00:11:33.760 align:start position:0% looking as as we weigh properties 00:11:33.760 --> 00:11:36.550 align:start position:0% looking as as we weigh properties against<00:11:34.079> the<00:11:34.720> projects<00:11:35.200> against<00:11:35.600> each<00:11:35.839> other 00:11:36.550 --> 00:11:36.560 align:start position:0% against the projects against each other 00:11:36.560 --> 00:11:40.870 align:start position:0% against the projects against each other uh<00:11:36.959> these<00:11:37.200> would<00:11:37.360> be<00:11:37.600> sort<00:11:37.760> of<00:11:37.920> the<00:11:38.399> priority 00:11:40.870 --> 00:11:40.880 align:start position:0% uh these would be sort of the priority 00:11:40.880 --> 00:11:43.750 align:start position:0% uh these would be sort of the priority order<00:11:41.839> high<00:11:42.079> medium<00:11:42.399> low<00:11:42.720> and<00:11:42.880> lowest<00:11:43.360> for 00:11:43.750 --> 00:11:43.760 align:start position:0% order high medium low and lowest for 00:11:43.760 --> 00:11:46.310 align:start position:0% order high medium low and lowest for these<00:11:44.000> different<00:11:44.399> types<00:11:44.720> of<00:11:44.880> projects 00:11:46.310 --> 00:11:46.320 align:start position:0% these different types of projects 00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:47.590 align:start position:0% these different types of projects and<00:11:46.480> again 00:11:47.590 --> 00:11:47.600 align:start position:0% and again 00:11:47.600 --> 00:11:49.829 align:start position:0% and again these<00:11:47.839> are<00:11:48.000> guidelines<00:11:48.959> it<00:11:49.120> doesn't<00:11:49.440> mean<00:11:49.680> if 00:11:49.829 --> 00:11:49.839 align:start position:0% these are guidelines it doesn't mean if 00:11:49.839 --> 00:11:51.750 align:start position:0% these are guidelines it doesn't mean if there's<00:11:50.560> you<00:11:50.639> know<00:11:50.800> a<00:11:50.959> low 00:11:51.750 --> 00:11:51.760 align:start position:0% there's you know a low 00:11:51.760 --> 00:11:53.750 align:start position:0% there's you know a low on<00:11:52.000> here<00:11:52.639> and<00:11:52.720> there's<00:11:52.959> also<00:11:53.200> a<00:11:53.360> high<00:11:53.680> it 00:11:53.750 --> 00:11:53.760 align:start position:0% on here and there's also a high it 00:11:53.760 --> 00:11:55.990 align:start position:0% on here and there's also a high it doesn't<00:11:54.000> mean<00:11:54.240> you<00:11:54.399> can't<00:11:54.720> fund<00:11:55.279> the<00:11:55.440> low<00:11:55.760> over 00:11:55.990 --> 00:11:56.000 align:start position:0% doesn't mean you can't fund the low over 00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:58.069 align:start position:0% doesn't mean you can't fund the low over the<00:11:56.160> high<00:11:56.560> based<00:11:56.880> on<00:11:57.040> this<00:11:57.279> but 00:11:58.069 --> 00:11:58.079 align:start position:0% the high based on this but 00:11:58.079 --> 00:12:00.230 align:start position:0% the high based on this but it's<00:11:58.320> to<00:11:58.480> provide<00:11:58.880> guidance<00:11:59.440> both<00:11:59.680> to<00:11:59.839> staff 00:12:00.230 --> 00:12:00.240 align:start position:0% it's to provide guidance both to staff 00:12:00.240 --> 00:12:01.670 align:start position:0% it's to provide guidance both to staff as<00:12:00.399> we<00:12:00.560> review<00:12:01.040> them<00:12:01.200> and<00:12:01.440> make 00:12:01.670 --> 00:12:01.680 align:start position:0% as we review them and make 00:12:01.680 --> 00:12:03.910 align:start position:0% as we review them and make recommendations<00:12:02.800> but<00:12:03.040> also<00:12:03.279> for<00:12:03.440> the<00:12:03.600> board 00:12:03.910 --> 00:12:03.920 align:start position:0% recommendations but also for the board 00:12:03.920 --> 00:12:05.509 align:start position:0% recommendations but also for the board to<00:12:04.399> consider 00:12:05.509 --> 00:12:05.519 align:start position:0% to consider 00:12:05.519 --> 00:12:07.190 align:start position:0% to consider as<00:12:05.680> you're<00:12:05.760> reviewing<00:12:06.399> each 00:12:07.190 --> 00:12:07.200 align:start position:0% as you're reviewing each 00:12:07.200 --> 00:12:08.310 align:start position:0% as you're reviewing each project 00:12:08.310 --> 00:12:08.320 align:start position:0% project 00:12:08.320 --> 00:12:10.150 align:start position:0% project and<00:12:08.480> this<00:12:08.720> is<00:12:08.800> largely<00:12:09.279> a<00:12:09.360> function<00:12:09.760> of<00:12:09.920> the 00:12:10.150 --> 00:12:10.160 align:start position:0% and this is largely a function of the 00:12:10.160 --> 00:12:11.670 align:start position:0% and this is largely a function of the south<00:12:10.560> where<00:12:10.720> we 00:12:11.670 --> 00:12:11.680 align:start position:0% south where we 00:12:11.680 --> 00:12:13.829 align:start position:0% south where we like<00:12:11.920> with<00:12:12.079> this<00:12:12.320> coming<00:12:12.560> up<00:12:12.800> cycle<00:12:13.680> you'll 00:12:13.829 --> 00:12:13.839 align:start position:0% like with this coming up cycle you'll 00:12:13.839 --> 00:12:15.670 align:start position:0% like with this coming up cycle you'll see<00:12:14.079> that<00:12:14.160> we<00:12:14.320> have<00:12:14.560> more<00:12:14.880> projects<00:12:15.360> than<00:12:15.519> we 00:12:15.670 --> 00:12:15.680 align:start position:0% see that we have more projects than we 00:12:15.680 --> 00:12:17.990 align:start position:0% see that we have more projects than we have<00:12:15.920> funding<00:12:16.240> available<00:12:17.200> and<00:12:17.440> so<00:12:17.680> these 00:12:17.990 --> 00:12:18.000 align:start position:0% have funding available and so these 00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:19.750 align:start position:0% have funding available and so these prioritizations<00:12:19.040> are 00:12:19.750 --> 00:12:19.760 align:start position:0% prioritizations are 00:12:19.760 --> 00:12:22.069 align:start position:0% prioritizations are key<00:12:20.079> to<00:12:20.240> help<00:12:20.480> us<00:12:20.720> decide<00:12:21.120> which<00:12:21.519> projects<00:12:21.920> to 00:12:22.069 --> 00:12:22.079 align:start position:0% key to help us decide which projects to 00:12:22.079 --> 00:12:26.790 align:start position:0% key to help us decide which projects to recommend<00:12:22.480> and<00:12:22.560> which<00:12:22.800> not<00:12:23.040> to 00:12:26.790 --> 00:12:26.800 align:start position:0% 00:12:26.800 --> 00:12:28.470 align:start position:0% other<00:12:27.040> considerations<00:12:27.760> these<00:12:28.000> are<00:12:28.079> ones<00:12:28.320> we 00:12:28.470 --> 00:12:28.480 align:start position:0% other considerations these are ones we 00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:29.829 align:start position:0% other considerations these are ones we talked<00:12:28.800> about<00:12:29.040> but<00:12:29.200> we've<00:12:29.440> added<00:12:29.680> some 00:12:29.829 --> 00:12:29.839 align:start position:0% talked about but we've added some 00:12:29.839 --> 00:12:31.590 align:start position:0% talked about but we've added some language<00:12:30.240> on<00:12:30.399> each<00:12:30.639> of<00:12:30.720> these 00:12:31.590 --> 00:12:31.600 align:start position:0% language on each of these 00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:33.509 align:start position:0% language on each of these more<00:12:31.839> weight<00:12:32.160> to<00:12:32.320> things<00:12:32.639> that<00:12:32.880> look<00:12:33.120> bad 00:12:33.509 --> 00:12:33.519 align:start position:0% more weight to things that look bad 00:12:33.519 --> 00:12:35.430 align:start position:0% more weight to things that look bad currently<00:12:34.320> and<00:12:34.480> they're<00:12:34.639> going<00:12:34.880> to<00:12:35.040> improve 00:12:35.430 --> 00:12:35.440 align:start position:0% currently and they're going to improve 00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:36.150 align:start position:0% currently and they're going to improve it 00:12:36.150 --> 00:12:36.160 align:start position:0% it 00:12:36.160 --> 00:12:37.430 align:start position:0% it versus 00:12:37.430 --> 00:12:37.440 align:start position:0% versus 00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:38.870 align:start position:0% versus more<00:12:37.680> improvements<00:12:38.240> to<00:12:38.399> something<00:12:38.639> that 00:12:38.870 --> 00:12:38.880 align:start position:0% more improvements to something that 00:12:38.880 --> 00:12:40.389 align:start position:0% more improvements to something that already<00:12:39.200> looks<00:12:39.519> nice 00:12:40.389 --> 00:12:40.399 align:start position:0% already looks nice 00:12:40.399 --> 00:12:41.910 align:start position:0% already looks nice uh<00:12:40.639> higher<00:12:40.959> priority<00:12:41.360> for<00:12:41.519> things<00:12:41.760> that<00:12:41.839> are 00:12:41.910 --> 00:12:41.920 align:start position:0% uh higher priority for things that are 00:12:41.920 --> 00:12:44.389 align:start position:0% uh higher priority for things that are visible<00:12:42.480> we<00:12:42.639> had<00:12:42.800> the<00:12:42.880> one<00:12:43.120> project<00:12:44.000> again<00:12:44.320> you 00:12:44.389 --> 00:12:44.399 align:start position:0% visible we had the one project again you 00:12:44.399 --> 00:12:46.629 align:start position:0% visible we had the one project again you could<00:12:44.639> still<00:12:44.959> fund<00:12:45.279> but<00:12:45.839> if<00:12:46.079> it's<00:12:46.240> a<00:12:46.320> front 00:12:46.629 --> 00:12:46.639 align:start position:0% could still fund but if it's a front 00:12:46.639 --> 00:12:48.710 align:start position:0% could still fund but if it's a front facade<00:12:47.120> facing<00:12:47.440> the<00:12:47.600> street<00:12:48.240> that<00:12:48.399> would<00:12:48.560> get 00:12:48.710 --> 00:12:48.720 align:start position:0% facade facing the street that would get 00:12:48.720 --> 00:12:50.949 align:start position:0% facade facing the street that would get higher<00:12:49.040> priority<00:12:49.920> over<00:12:50.240> improvements<00:12:50.720> that 00:12:50.949 --> 00:12:50.959 align:start position:0% higher priority over improvements that 00:12:50.959 --> 00:12:53.350 align:start position:0% higher priority over improvements that face<00:12:51.279> like<00:12:51.440> the<00:12:51.600> alley 00:12:53.350 --> 00:12:53.360 align:start position:0% face like the alley 00:12:53.360 --> 00:12:55.110 align:start position:0% face like the alley higher<00:12:53.600> priority<00:12:54.000> for<00:12:54.240> existing<00:12:54.720> or<00:12:54.800> planned 00:12:55.110 --> 00:12:55.120 align:start position:0% higher priority for existing or planned 00:12:55.120 --> 00:12:57.509 align:start position:0% higher priority for existing or planned occupancy<00:12:55.760> versus<00:12:56.160> vacant<00:12:57.040> so<00:12:57.200> if<00:12:57.279> there's 00:12:57.509 --> 00:12:57.519 align:start position:0% occupancy versus vacant so if there's 00:12:57.519 --> 00:12:59.030 align:start position:0% occupancy versus vacant so if there's somebody<00:12:57.839> we<00:12:58.000> know<00:12:58.160> is<00:12:58.320> going<00:12:58.639> in<00:12:58.800> or<00:12:58.959> a 00:12:59.030 --> 00:12:59.040 align:start position:0% somebody we know is going in or a 00:12:59.040 --> 00:13:00.550 align:start position:0% somebody we know is going in or a business<00:12:59.360> that's<00:12:59.519> already<00:12:59.839> in 00:13:00.550 --> 00:13:00.560 align:start position:0% business that's already in 00:13:00.560 --> 00:13:02.629 align:start position:0% business that's already in they<00:13:00.800> would<00:13:00.959> get<00:13:01.120> priority<00:13:01.760> over<00:13:02.079> improving<00:13:02.560> a 00:13:02.629 --> 00:13:02.639 align:start position:0% they would get priority over improving a 00:13:02.639 --> 00:13:04.310 align:start position:0% they would get priority over improving a vacant<00:13:02.959> building<00:13:03.360> that<00:13:03.519> there<00:13:03.680> are<00:13:03.760> no<00:13:04.000> plans 00:13:04.310 --> 00:13:04.320 align:start position:0% vacant building that there are no plans 00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:08.310 align:start position:0% vacant building that there are no plans to<00:13:04.480> fill<00:13:04.720> with<00:13:04.959> anything 00:13:08.310 --> 00:13:08.320 align:start position:0% 00:13:08.320 --> 00:13:09.910 align:start position:0% we<00:13:08.480> talked<00:13:08.720> about<00:13:08.959> higher<00:13:09.279> priority<00:13:09.680> for 00:13:09.910 --> 00:13:09.920 align:start position:0% we talked about higher priority for 00:13:09.920 --> 00:13:11.990 align:start position:0% we talked about higher priority for sites<00:13:10.320> or<00:13:10.560> owners<00:13:10.959> that<00:13:11.120> have<00:13:11.360> not<00:13:11.600> received 00:13:11.990 --> 00:13:12.000 align:start position:0% sites or owners that have not received 00:13:12.000 --> 00:13:13.910 align:start position:0% sites or owners that have not received funding<00:13:12.480> so<00:13:12.800> if<00:13:12.959> we<00:13:13.120> don't<00:13:13.279> have<00:13:13.440> enough<00:13:13.680> money 00:13:13.910 --> 00:13:13.920 align:start position:0% funding so if we don't have enough money 00:13:13.920 --> 00:13:16.389 align:start position:0% funding so if we don't have enough money to<00:13:14.079> fund<00:13:14.240> two<00:13:14.560> projects<00:13:15.440> if<00:13:15.680> one<00:13:15.920> is<00:13:16.079> a<00:13:16.160> brand 00:13:16.389 --> 00:13:16.399 align:start position:0% to fund two projects if one is a brand 00:13:16.399 --> 00:13:18.470 align:start position:0% to fund two projects if one is a brand new<00:13:17.040> project 00:13:18.470 --> 00:13:18.480 align:start position:0% new project 00:13:18.480 --> 00:13:20.790 align:start position:0% new project and<00:13:18.639> another<00:13:19.120> is<00:13:19.440> someone<00:13:19.920> who<00:13:20.160> has<00:13:20.399> received 00:13:20.790 --> 00:13:20.800 align:start position:0% and another is someone who has received 00:13:20.800 --> 00:13:23.110 align:start position:0% and another is someone who has received funding<00:13:21.279> in<00:13:21.360> a<00:13:21.440> previous<00:13:21.839> cycle<00:13:22.639> in<00:13:22.720> the<00:13:22.800> past 00:13:23.110 --> 00:13:23.120 align:start position:0% funding in a previous cycle in the past 00:13:23.120 --> 00:13:23.910 align:start position:0% funding in a previous cycle in the past year 00:13:23.910 --> 00:13:23.920 align:start position:0% year 00:13:23.920 --> 00:13:25.509 align:start position:0% year then<00:13:24.079> we<00:13:24.240> would<00:13:24.560> give<00:13:24.800> more<00:13:25.040> weight<00:13:25.279> to<00:13:25.440> the 00:13:25.509 --> 00:13:25.519 align:start position:0% then we would give more weight to the 00:13:25.519 --> 00:13:27.509 align:start position:0% then we would give more weight to the one<00:13:25.680> that<00:13:25.839> had<00:13:26.000> not<00:13:26.240> received<00:13:26.639> funding 00:13:27.509 --> 00:13:27.519 align:start position:0% one that had not received funding 00:13:27.519 --> 00:13:29.509 align:start position:0% one that had not received funding we're<00:13:27.760> seeing<00:13:28.000> that<00:13:28.320> more<00:13:28.639> because<00:13:28.959> projects 00:13:29.509 --> 00:13:29.519 align:start position:0% we're seeing that more because projects 00:13:29.519 --> 00:13:32.069 align:start position:0% we're seeing that more because projects that<00:13:29.839> are<00:13:30.320> coming<00:13:30.720> back<00:13:30.959> for<00:13:31.120> more<00:13:31.360> funding 00:13:32.069 --> 00:13:32.079 align:start position:0% that are coming back for more funding 00:13:32.079 --> 00:13:33.670 align:start position:0% that are coming back for more funding which<00:13:32.320> is<00:13:32.480> great 00:13:33.670 --> 00:13:33.680 align:start position:0% which is great 00:13:33.680 --> 00:13:36.069 align:start position:0% which is great the<00:13:33.839> old<00:13:34.079> firehouse<00:13:34.639> is<00:13:34.800> one<00:13:35.040> example<00:13:35.839> i<00:13:35.920> think 00:13:36.069 --> 00:13:36.079 align:start position:0% the old firehouse is one example i think 00:13:36.079 --> 00:13:37.750 align:start position:0% the old firehouse is one example i think they've<00:13:36.320> gotten<00:13:36.639> three<00:13:36.880> different<00:13:37.200> grants 00:13:37.750 --> 00:13:37.760 align:start position:0% they've gotten three different grants 00:13:37.760 --> 00:13:39.829 align:start position:0% they've gotten three different grants from<00:13:37.920> the<00:13:38.079> board<00:13:38.880> and<00:13:39.120> they're<00:13:39.279> doing<00:13:39.519> a<00:13:39.600> great 00:13:39.829 --> 00:13:39.839 align:start position:0% from the board and they're doing a great 00:13:39.839 --> 00:13:41.750 align:start position:0% from the board and they're doing a great job<00:13:40.079> on<00:13:40.160> that<00:13:40.399> project 00:13:41.750 --> 00:13:41.760 align:start position:0% job on that project 00:13:41.760 --> 00:13:43.590 align:start position:0% job on that project but<00:13:42.000> on<00:13:42.079> the<00:13:42.240> other<00:13:42.480> hand<00:13:42.800> if<00:13:43.040> if<00:13:43.199> we<00:13:43.360> have 00:13:43.590 --> 00:13:43.600 align:start position:0% but on the other hand if if we have 00:13:43.600 --> 00:13:45.189 align:start position:0% but on the other hand if if we have somebody<00:13:44.000> a<00:13:44.240> brand<00:13:44.480> new<00:13:44.720> business<00:13:44.959> that's 00:13:45.189 --> 00:13:45.199 align:start position:0% somebody a brand new business that's 00:13:45.199 --> 00:13:47.430 align:start position:0% somebody a brand new business that's coming<00:13:45.440> in<00:13:45.600> that<00:13:45.760> hasn't<00:13:46.000> received<00:13:46.399> funding 00:13:47.430 --> 00:13:47.440 align:start position:0% coming in that hasn't received funding 00:13:47.440 --> 00:13:48.790 align:start position:0% coming in that hasn't received funding we<00:13:47.600> want<00:13:47.760> to<00:13:47.839> weight<00:13:48.079> them<00:13:48.240> a<00:13:48.320> little<00:13:48.560> higher 00:13:48.790 --> 00:13:48.800 align:start position:0% we want to weight them a little higher 00:13:48.800 --> 00:13:50.629 align:start position:0% we want to weight them a little higher than<00:13:48.959> somebody<00:13:49.279> who<00:13:49.519> has<00:13:49.760> received<00:13:50.160> it 00:13:50.629 --> 00:13:50.639 align:start position:0% than somebody who has received it 00:13:50.639 --> 00:13:52.710 align:start position:0% than somebody who has received it recently<00:13:51.519> i<00:13:51.680> like<00:13:51.839> that 00:13:52.710 --> 00:13:52.720 align:start position:0% recently i like that 00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:54.230 align:start position:0% recently i like that and<00:13:52.880> then<00:13:53.040> this<00:13:53.279> sort<00:13:53.519> of<00:13:53.600> relates<00:13:53.920> to<00:13:54.079> that 00:13:54.230 --> 00:13:54.240 align:start position:0% and then this sort of relates to that 00:13:54.240 --> 00:13:55.910 align:start position:0% and then this sort of relates to that tax<00:13:54.480> abatement<00:13:54.880> discussion<00:13:55.360> higher<00:13:55.600> priority 00:13:55.910 --> 00:13:55.920 align:start position:0% tax abatement discussion higher priority 00:13:55.920 --> 00:13:58.470 align:start position:0% tax abatement discussion higher priority for<00:13:56.079> projects<00:13:56.480> that<00:13:56.639> expand<00:13:57.040> the<00:13:57.120> tax<00:13:57.440> base 00:13:58.470 --> 00:13:58.480 align:start position:0% for projects that expand the tax base 00:13:58.480 --> 00:14:00.629 align:start position:0% for projects that expand the tax base one<00:13:58.639> of<00:13:58.720> the<00:13:58.800> things<00:13:59.120> that<00:13:59.680> we 00:14:00.629 --> 00:14:00.639 align:start position:0% one of the things that we 00:14:00.639 --> 00:14:02.710 align:start position:0% one of the things that we sometimes<00:14:01.120> have<00:14:01.279> looked<00:14:01.519> at<00:14:01.680> but<00:14:01.839> not<00:14:02.079> always 00:14:02.710 --> 00:14:02.720 align:start position:0% sometimes have looked at but not always 00:14:02.720 --> 00:14:04.710 align:start position:0% sometimes have looked at but not always is<00:14:02.959> the<00:14:03.120> economic<00:14:03.760> impact 00:14:04.710 --> 00:14:04.720 align:start position:0% is the economic impact 00:14:04.720 --> 00:14:06.069 align:start position:0% is the economic impact and<00:14:04.880> i<00:14:04.959> think<00:14:05.120> that's<00:14:05.360> something<00:14:05.680> we<00:14:05.839> heard 00:14:06.069 --> 00:14:06.079 align:start position:0% and i think that's something we heard 00:14:06.079 --> 00:14:08.150 align:start position:0% and i think that's something we heard from<00:14:06.399> some<00:14:06.560> board<00:14:06.800> members<00:14:07.519> at<00:14:07.600> the<00:14:07.760> recent 00:14:08.150 --> 00:14:08.160 align:start position:0% from some board members at the recent 00:14:08.160 --> 00:14:10.949 align:start position:0% from some board members at the recent meeting<00:14:08.959> is<00:14:09.440> let's<00:14:09.760> add<00:14:10.000> that<00:14:10.240> as<00:14:10.399> a<00:14:10.480> factor 00:14:10.949 --> 00:14:10.959 align:start position:0% meeting is let's add that as a factor 00:14:10.959 --> 00:14:13.509 align:start position:0% meeting is let's add that as a factor that<00:14:11.120> we<00:14:11.600> can<00:14:11.839> consider<00:14:12.720> in<00:14:12.959> weighting<00:14:13.279> those 00:14:13.509 --> 00:14:13.519 align:start position:0% that we can consider in weighting those 00:14:13.519 --> 00:14:16.550 align:start position:0% that we can consider in weighting those projects 00:14:16.550 --> 00:14:16.560 align:start position:0% 00:14:16.560 --> 00:14:18.150 align:start position:0% that's<00:14:16.880> really<00:14:17.199> it<00:14:17.279> that's<00:14:17.519> an<00:14:17.680> overview 00:14:18.150 --> 00:14:18.160 align:start position:0% that's really it that's an overview 00:14:18.160 --> 00:14:21.430 align:start position:0% that's really it that's an overview again<00:14:18.399> you've<00:14:18.560> got<00:14:18.800> the<00:14:18.959> full<00:14:19.199> document<00:14:19.680> here 00:14:21.430 --> 00:14:21.440 align:start position:0% again you've got the full document here 00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:24.150 align:start position:0% again you've got the full document here but<00:14:21.600> that's<00:14:22.399> that's<00:14:22.720> the<00:14:22.880> highlights<00:14:23.440> of<00:14:24.000> the 00:14:24.150 --> 00:14:24.160 align:start position:0% but that's that's the highlights of the 00:14:24.160 --> 00:14:26.069 align:start position:0% but that's that's the highlights of the changes 00:14:26.069 --> 00:14:26.079 align:start position:0% changes 00:14:26.079 --> 00:14:27.509 align:start position:0% changes i'd<00:14:26.240> be<00:14:26.399> happy<00:14:26.560> to<00:14:26.639> answer<00:14:26.959> any<00:14:27.120> questions 00:14:27.509 --> 00:14:27.519 align:start position:0% i'd be happy to answer any questions 00:14:27.519 --> 00:14:29.990 align:start position:0% i'd be happy to answer any questions that<00:14:27.600> you<00:14:27.760> have 00:14:29.990 --> 00:14:30.000 align:start position:0% that you have 00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:31.990 align:start position:0% that you have wasn't<00:14:30.320> here<00:14:30.560> on<00:14:30.720> that<00:14:30.880> meeting<00:14:31.360> but<00:14:31.600> i<00:14:31.760> did 00:14:31.990 --> 00:14:32.000 align:start position:0% wasn't here on that meeting but i did 00:14:32.000 --> 00:14:33.590 align:start position:0% wasn't here on that meeting but i did want<00:14:32.160> to<00:14:32.320> ask<00:14:32.639> them 00:14:33.590 --> 00:14:33.600 align:start position:0% want to ask them 00:14:33.600 --> 00:14:35.509 align:start position:0% want to ask them like<00:14:33.839> the<00:14:33.920> people<00:14:34.160> who<00:14:34.480> received<00:14:34.880> funding 00:14:35.509 --> 00:14:35.519 align:start position:0% like the people who received funding 00:14:35.519 --> 00:14:37.430 align:start position:0% like the people who received funding like<00:14:35.920> how<00:14:36.079> did<00:14:36.240> y'all<00:14:36.560> come<00:14:36.800> up<00:14:36.880> with<00:14:37.120> a<00:14:37.279> new 00:14:37.430 --> 00:14:37.440 align:start position:0% like how did y'all come up with a new 00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:39.189 align:start position:0% like how did y'all come up with a new rule<00:14:37.760> for<00:14:37.920> that<00:14:38.160> um 00:14:39.189 --> 00:14:39.199 align:start position:0% rule for that um 00:14:39.199 --> 00:14:42.150 align:start position:0% rule for that um like<00:14:39.920> what<00:14:40.160> they<00:14:40.720> people<00:14:40.959> who 00:14:42.150 --> 00:14:42.160 align:start position:0% like what they people who 00:14:42.160 --> 00:14:43.670 align:start position:0% like what they people who received<00:14:42.560> funding 00:14:43.670 --> 00:14:43.680 align:start position:0% received funding 00:14:43.680 --> 00:14:45.430 align:start position:0% received funding would<00:14:43.839> it<00:14:43.920> be<00:14:44.079> possible<00:14:44.480> for<00:14:44.639> them<00:14:44.800> to<00:14:44.959> like 00:14:45.430 --> 00:14:45.440 align:start position:0% would it be possible for them to like 00:14:45.440 --> 00:14:47.750 align:start position:0% would it be possible for them to like miss<00:14:45.760> out<00:14:45.839> on<00:14:46.000> the<00:14:46.160> next<00:14:46.560> one<00:14:47.040> and<00:14:47.199> then<00:14:47.600> they 00:14:47.750 --> 00:14:47.760 align:start position:0% miss out on the next one and then they 00:14:47.760 --> 00:14:50.389 align:start position:0% miss out on the next one and then they can<00:14:48.000> apply 00:14:50.389 --> 00:14:50.399 align:start position:0% 00:14:50.399 --> 00:14:51.269 align:start position:0% again 00:14:51.269 --> 00:14:51.279 align:start position:0% again 00:14:51.279 --> 00:14:53.430 align:start position:0% again yes<00:14:51.760> now<00:14:51.920> the<00:14:52.079> way<00:14:52.320> we've<00:14:52.560> worded<00:14:52.959> this<00:14:53.279> it 00:14:53.430 --> 00:14:53.440 align:start position:0% yes now the way we've worded this it 00:14:53.440 --> 00:14:55.990 align:start position:0% yes now the way we've worded this it wouldn't<00:14:53.839> preclude<00:14:54.320> them<00:14:54.560> from<00:14:55.279> from 00:14:55.990 --> 00:14:56.000 align:start position:0% wouldn't preclude them from from 00:14:56.000 --> 00:14:57.430 align:start position:0% wouldn't preclude them from from applying<00:14:56.560> again 00:14:57.430 --> 00:14:57.440 align:start position:0% applying again 00:14:57.440 --> 00:14:59.910 align:start position:0% applying again it's<00:14:57.680> just<00:14:58.000> we<00:14:58.240> would<00:14:58.399> weight<00:14:58.720> them<00:14:59.040> lower 00:14:59.910 --> 00:14:59.920 align:start position:0% it's just we would weight them lower 00:14:59.920 --> 00:15:01.509 align:start position:0% it's just we would weight them lower if<00:15:00.079> they<00:15:00.240> had<00:15:00.399> just<00:15:00.639> received<00:15:01.040> funding<00:15:01.360> in<00:15:01.440> the 00:15:01.509 --> 00:15:01.519 align:start position:0% if they had just received funding in the 00:15:01.519 --> 00:15:03.910 align:start position:0% if they had just received funding in the previous<00:15:02.000> cycle<00:15:02.480> okay<00:15:02.959> i<00:15:03.040> mean<00:15:03.199> it<00:15:03.360> just<00:15:03.760> the 00:15:03.910 --> 00:15:03.920 align:start position:0% previous cycle okay i mean it just the 00:15:03.920 --> 00:15:05.990 align:start position:0% previous cycle okay i mean it just the south<00:15:04.320> i<00:15:04.399> mean<00:15:04.800> there's 00:15:05.990 --> 00:15:06.000 align:start position:0% south i mean there's 00:15:06.000 --> 00:15:08.150 align:start position:0% south i mean there's so<00:15:06.160> many<00:15:06.399> people<00:15:06.720> asking<00:15:07.040> for<00:15:07.199> stuff<00:15:07.519> right<00:15:08.000> we 00:15:08.150 --> 00:15:08.160 align:start position:0% so many people asking for stuff right we 00:15:08.160 --> 00:15:10.310 align:start position:0% so many people asking for stuff right we help<00:15:08.480> out<00:15:08.560> a<00:15:08.639> lot<00:15:08.800> of<00:15:08.880> people<00:15:09.199> that<00:15:09.680> over<00:15:10.079> and 00:15:10.310 --> 00:15:10.320 align:start position:0% help out a lot of people that over and 00:15:10.320 --> 00:15:12.710 align:start position:0% help out a lot of people that over and over<00:15:10.639> and<00:15:10.839> over<00:15:12.000> and<00:15:12.160> again<00:15:12.399> that's<00:15:12.639> what 00:15:12.710 --> 00:15:12.720 align:start position:0% over and over and again that's what 00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:13.910 align:start position:0% over and over and again that's what we've<00:15:12.959> heard<00:15:13.199> from<00:15:13.360> some<00:15:13.519> of<00:15:13.600> the<00:15:13.680> board 00:15:13.910 --> 00:15:13.920 align:start position:0% we've heard from some of the board 00:15:13.920 --> 00:15:15.750 align:start position:0% we've heard from some of the board members<00:15:14.240> so<00:15:14.399> that's<00:15:14.800> that's<00:15:15.120> kind<00:15:15.279> of<00:15:15.360> what 00:15:15.750 --> 00:15:15.760 align:start position:0% members so that's that's kind of what 00:15:15.760 --> 00:15:17.829 align:start position:0% members so that's that's kind of what this<00:15:16.079> okay<00:15:16.639> provision<00:15:17.040> was<00:15:17.279> intended<00:15:17.680> to 00:15:17.829 --> 00:15:17.839 align:start position:0% this okay provision was intended to 00:15:17.839 --> 00:15:19.509 align:start position:0% this okay provision was intended to address 00:15:19.509 --> 00:15:19.519 align:start position:0% address 00:15:19.519 --> 00:15:21.110 align:start position:0% address i<00:15:19.680> will<00:15:19.920> note<00:15:20.240> i<00:15:20.320> should<00:15:20.560> have<00:15:20.639> started<00:15:20.959> with 00:15:21.110 --> 00:15:21.120 align:start position:0% i will note i should have started with 00:15:21.120 --> 00:15:21.910 align:start position:0% i will note i should have started with this 00:15:21.910 --> 00:15:21.920 align:start position:0% this 00:15:21.920 --> 00:15:24.310 align:start position:0% this uh<00:15:22.320> as<00:15:22.560> we<00:15:22.720> were<00:15:22.880> reviewing<00:15:23.360> these<00:15:23.680> we<00:15:23.839> had<00:15:24.079> two 00:15:24.310 --> 00:15:24.320 align:start position:0% uh as we were reviewing these we had two 00:15:24.320 --> 00:15:26.870 align:start position:0% uh as we were reviewing these we had two policies<00:15:24.800> the<00:15:24.959> north<00:15:25.199> and<00:15:25.360> the<00:15:25.440> south<00:15:26.320> and 00:15:26.870 --> 00:15:26.880 align:start position:0% policies the north and the south and 00:15:26.880 --> 00:15:30.470 align:start position:0% policies the north and the south and they<00:15:27.040> were<00:15:27.320> 95<00:15:28.720> the<00:15:28.959> same<00:15:29.680> there<00:15:29.839> was<00:15:30.079> just<00:15:30.320> a 00:15:30.470 --> 00:15:30.480 align:start position:0% they were 95 the same there was just a 00:15:30.480 --> 00:15:33.350 align:start position:0% they were 95 the same there was just a few<00:15:31.040> terminology<00:15:31.920> differences<00:15:32.560> or 00:15:33.350 --> 00:15:33.360 align:start position:0% few terminology differences or 00:15:33.360 --> 00:15:34.949 align:start position:0% few terminology differences or for<00:15:33.519> example<00:15:33.920> in<00:15:34.000> the<00:15:34.160> south<00:15:34.399> there<00:15:34.560> were<00:15:34.720> some 00:15:34.949 --> 00:15:34.959 align:start position:0% for example in the south there were some 00:15:34.959 --> 00:15:36.710 align:start position:0% for example in the south there were some references<00:15:35.519> to<00:15:35.680> the<00:15:35.759> design<00:15:36.240> and<00:15:36.320> historic 00:15:36.710 --> 00:15:36.720 align:start position:0% references to the design and historic 00:15:36.720 --> 00:15:38.550 align:start position:0% references to the design and historic review<00:15:37.040> commission<00:15:37.839> because<00:15:38.079> that<00:15:38.320> falls 00:15:38.550 --> 00:15:38.560 align:start position:0% review commission because that falls 00:15:38.560 --> 00:15:40.470 align:start position:0% review commission because that falls within<00:15:38.880> the<00:15:38.959> downtown<00:15:39.519> district<00:15:39.920> that<00:15:40.240> gets 00:15:40.470 --> 00:15:40.480 align:start position:0% within the downtown district that gets 00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:42.069 align:start position:0% within the downtown district that gets reviewed 00:15:42.069 --> 00:15:42.079 align:start position:0% reviewed 00:15:42.079 --> 00:15:43.670 align:start position:0% reviewed we<00:15:42.240> took<00:15:42.480> those<00:15:42.720> documents<00:15:43.199> and<00:15:43.279> basically 00:15:43.670 --> 00:15:43.680 align:start position:0% we took those documents and basically 00:15:43.680 --> 00:15:45.829 align:start position:0% we took those documents and basically combined<00:15:44.079> them<00:15:44.320> together<00:15:45.040> and<00:15:45.279> just<00:15:45.519> made 00:15:45.829 --> 00:15:45.839 align:start position:0% combined them together and just made 00:15:45.839 --> 00:15:47.749 align:start position:0% combined them together and just made clear<00:15:46.240> which<00:15:46.480> of<00:15:46.639> those<00:15:46.800> provisions<00:15:47.360> apply 00:15:47.749 --> 00:15:47.759 align:start position:0% clear which of those provisions apply 00:15:47.759 --> 00:15:49.910 align:start position:0% clear which of those provisions apply only<00:15:48.000> to<00:15:48.079> the<00:15:48.160> north<00:15:48.480> or<00:15:48.639> the<00:15:48.800> south 00:15:49.910 --> 00:15:49.920 align:start position:0% only to the north or the south 00:15:49.920 --> 00:15:52.629 align:start position:0% only to the north or the south but<00:15:50.079> that<00:15:50.800> kind<00:15:50.959> of<00:15:51.120> simplifies<00:15:51.759> things<00:15:52.079> so<00:15:52.560> we 00:15:52.629 --> 00:15:52.639 align:start position:0% but that kind of simplifies things so we 00:15:52.639 --> 00:15:54.710 align:start position:0% but that kind of simplifies things so we don't<00:15:52.800> have<00:15:52.959> two<00:15:53.120> documents<00:15:53.600> that<00:15:53.839> read 00:15:54.710 --> 00:15:54.720 align:start position:0% don't have two documents that read 00:15:54.720 --> 00:15:56.550 align:start position:0% don't have two documents that read almost<00:15:55.120> exactly<00:15:55.519> the<00:15:55.680> same<00:15:56.000> with<00:15:56.160> those<00:15:56.399> few 00:15:56.550 --> 00:15:56.560 align:start position:0% almost exactly the same with those few 00:15:56.560 --> 00:15:59.110 align:start position:0% almost exactly the same with those few differences 00:15:59.110 --> 00:15:59.120 align:start position:0% 00:15:59.120 --> 00:16:00.949 align:start position:0% any<00:15:59.440> other<00:15:59.600> questions<00:16:00.079> or 00:16:00.949 --> 00:16:00.959 align:start position:0% any other questions or 00:16:00.959 --> 00:16:04.389 align:start position:0% any other questions or oh<00:16:01.120> that<00:16:01.199> sounds<00:16:01.519> good 00:16:04.389 --> 00:16:04.399 align:start position:0% 00:16:04.399 --> 00:16:06.470 align:start position:0% i<00:16:04.560> must<00:16:05.040> forgot 00:16:06.470 --> 00:16:06.480 align:start position:0% i must forgot 00:16:06.480 --> 00:16:08.790 align:start position:0% i must forgot i<00:16:06.639> know<00:16:06.800> we<00:16:06.959> talked<00:16:07.199> about<00:16:07.519> it<00:16:07.680> but 00:16:08.790 --> 00:16:08.800 align:start position:0% i know we talked about it but 00:16:08.800 --> 00:16:12.230 align:start position:0% i know we talked about it but is<00:16:08.959> it<00:16:09.600> accurate<00:16:10.399> that<00:16:10.800> if<00:16:11.040> you 00:16:12.230 --> 00:16:12.240 align:start position:0% is it accurate that if you 00:16:12.240 --> 00:16:13.829 align:start position:0% is it accurate that if you pay 00:16:13.829 --> 00:16:13.839 align:start position:0% pay 00:16:13.839 --> 00:16:14.949 align:start position:0% pay payment 00:16:14.949 --> 00:16:14.959 align:start position:0% payment 00:16:14.959 --> 00:16:16.230 align:start position:0% payment triggers 00:16:16.230 --> 00:16:16.240 align:start position:0% triggers 00:16:16.240 --> 00:16:19.509 align:start position:0% triggers an<00:16:16.560> increase<00:16:17.519> in<00:16:18.079> your<00:16:18.560> tax 00:16:19.509 --> 00:16:19.519 align:start position:0% an increase in your tax 00:16:19.519 --> 00:16:23.269 align:start position:0% an increase in your tax overall<00:16:20.079> tax<00:16:20.399> bill 00:16:23.269 --> 00:16:23.279 align:start position:0% overall tax bill 00:16:23.279 --> 00:16:26.870 align:start position:0% overall tax bill i<00:16:23.440> know<00:16:23.600> we<00:16:23.839> discussed<00:16:24.240> that 00:16:26.870 --> 00:16:26.880 align:start position:0% 00:16:26.880 --> 00:16:28.389 align:start position:0% i<00:16:26.959> don't<00:16:27.120> know<00:16:27.199> if<00:16:27.360> any<00:16:27.519> of<00:16:27.600> you<00:16:27.839> all<00:16:28.000> remember 00:16:28.389 --> 00:16:28.399 align:start position:0% i don't know if any of you all remember 00:16:28.399 --> 00:16:30.150 align:start position:0% i don't know if any of you all remember i<00:16:28.639> think<00:16:28.880> the<00:16:29.120> answer<00:16:29.440> from<00:16:29.600> the<00:16:29.680> appraisal 00:16:30.150 --> 00:16:30.160 align:start position:0% i think the answer from the appraisal 00:16:30.160 --> 00:16:31.670 align:start position:0% i think the answer from the appraisal district<00:16:30.639> was 00:16:31.670 --> 00:16:31.680 align:start position:0% district was 00:16:31.680 --> 00:16:33.749 align:start position:0% district was that<00:16:32.000> improvements<00:16:32.560> to<00:16:32.720> the<00:16:32.880> paving<00:16:33.360> parking 00:16:33.749 --> 00:16:33.759 align:start position:0% that improvements to the paving parking 00:16:33.759 --> 00:16:34.829 align:start position:0% that improvements to the paving parking lots 00:16:34.829 --> 00:16:34.839 align:start position:0% lots 00:16:34.839 --> 00:16:37.509 align:start position:0% lots um<00:16:36.000> would<00:16:36.240> possibly 00:16:37.509 --> 00:16:37.519 align:start position:0% um would possibly 00:16:37.519 --> 00:16:38.949 align:start position:0% um would possibly result<00:16:38.079> in 00:16:38.949 --> 00:16:38.959 align:start position:0% result in 00:16:38.959 --> 00:16:40.550 align:start position:0% result in increased<00:16:39.440> values 00:16:40.550 --> 00:16:40.560 align:start position:0% increased values 00:16:40.560 --> 00:16:42.470 align:start position:0% increased values although<00:16:40.800> not<00:16:41.040> to<00:16:41.199> the<00:16:41.360> extent<00:16:41.759> that<00:16:42.160> building 00:16:42.470 --> 00:16:42.480 align:start position:0% although not to the extent that building 00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:43.910 align:start position:0% although not to the extent that building improvements<00:16:43.040> and<00:16:43.120> those<00:16:43.360> sorts<00:16:43.600> of<00:16:43.680> things 00:16:43.910 --> 00:16:43.920 align:start position:0% improvements and those sorts of things 00:16:43.920 --> 00:16:45.189 align:start position:0% improvements and those sorts of things would 00:16:45.189 --> 00:16:45.199 align:start position:0% would 00:16:45.199 --> 00:16:48.310 align:start position:0% would okay<00:16:45.839> but<00:16:46.079> i<00:16:46.160> think 00:16:48.310 --> 00:16:48.320 align:start position:0% okay but i think 00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:50.389 align:start position:0% okay but i think part<00:16:48.480> of<00:16:48.639> it<00:16:48.839> was 00:16:50.389 --> 00:16:50.399 align:start position:0% part of it was 00:16:50.399 --> 00:16:53.430 align:start position:0% part of it was as<00:16:50.720> areas<00:16:51.120> are<00:16:51.279> improved<00:16:51.920> overall 00:16:53.430 --> 00:16:53.440 align:start position:0% as areas are improved overall 00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:56.790 align:start position:0% as areas are improved overall values<00:16:54.480> are<00:16:54.639> going<00:16:54.720> to<00:16:54.800> go<00:16:55.120> up<00:16:55.519> and<00:16:55.759> so 00:16:56.790 --> 00:16:56.800 align:start position:0% values are going to go up and so 00:16:56.800 --> 00:16:59.110 align:start position:0% values are going to go up and so even<00:16:57.120> another<00:16:57.519> property's<00:16:58.000> improvement 00:16:59.110 --> 00:16:59.120 align:start position:0% even another property's improvement 00:16:59.120 --> 00:17:01.030 align:start position:0% even another property's improvement might<00:16:59.360> result<00:16:59.839> in<00:17:00.000> higher<00:17:00.399> rents<00:17:00.720> higher 00:17:01.030 --> 00:17:01.040 align:start position:0% might result in higher rents higher 00:17:01.040 --> 00:17:03.269 align:start position:0% might result in higher rents higher sales<00:17:01.360> values<00:17:02.320> which<00:17:02.560> will<00:17:02.720> affect<00:17:03.040> all<00:17:03.120> the 00:17:03.269 --> 00:17:03.279 align:start position:0% sales values which will affect all the 00:17:03.279 --> 00:17:05.590 align:start position:0% sales values which will affect all the properties<00:17:03.680> around<00:17:04.000> them<00:17:04.240> so<00:17:04.480> over<00:17:04.720> time 00:17:05.590 --> 00:17:05.600 align:start position:0% properties around them so over time 00:17:05.600 --> 00:17:08.470 align:start position:0% properties around them so over time it<00:17:05.760> tends<00:17:06.079> to 00:17:08.470 --> 00:17:08.480 align:start position:0% 00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:10.870 align:start position:0% do<00:17:08.640> you<00:17:08.720> need<00:17:08.880> any<00:17:09.199> action<00:17:09.520> on<00:17:09.679> those<00:17:10.000> policies 00:17:10.870 --> 00:17:10.880 align:start position:0% do you need any action on those policies 00:17:10.880 --> 00:17:13.350 align:start position:0% do you need any action on those policies well<00:17:11.120> if<00:17:11.600> you<00:17:11.760> all<00:17:11.919> are<00:17:12.000> comfortable<00:17:12.559> with<00:17:12.799> it 00:17:13.350 --> 00:17:13.360 align:start position:0% well if you all are comfortable with it 00:17:13.360 --> 00:17:15.750 align:start position:0% well if you all are comfortable with it a<00:17:13.520> motion<00:17:13.919> to<00:17:14.640> recommend<00:17:15.039> this<00:17:15.280> to<00:17:15.439> the<00:17:15.520> city 00:17:15.750 --> 00:17:15.760 align:start position:0% a motion to recommend this to the city 00:17:15.760 --> 00:17:17.110 align:start position:0% a motion to recommend this to the city council 00:17:17.110 --> 00:17:17.120 align:start position:0% council 00:17:17.120 --> 00:17:18.870 align:start position:0% council with<00:17:17.360> those<00:17:17.679> changes<00:17:18.160> that<00:17:18.240> we<00:17:18.400> discussed<00:17:18.799> on 00:17:18.870 --> 00:17:18.880 align:start position:0% with those changes that we discussed on 00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:20.710 align:start position:0% with those changes that we discussed on the<00:17:18.959> property<00:17:19.360> tax 00:17:20.710 --> 00:17:20.720 align:start position:0% the property tax 00:17:20.720 --> 00:17:22.069 align:start position:0% the property tax if<00:17:20.799> you're<00:17:21.039> comfortable<00:17:21.439> making<00:17:21.760> that 00:17:22.069 --> 00:17:22.079 align:start position:0% if you're comfortable making that 00:17:22.079 --> 00:17:24.949 align:start position:0% if you're comfortable making that decision<00:17:22.559> today 00:17:24.949 --> 00:17:24.959 align:start position:0% 00:17:24.959 --> 00:17:26.470 align:start position:0% preference<00:17:25.520> do<00:17:25.600> you<00:17:25.679> want<00:17:25.839> to<00:17:26.000> see<00:17:26.240> that 00:17:26.470 --> 00:17:26.480 align:start position:0% preference do you want to see that 00:17:26.480 --> 00:17:28.150 align:start position:0% preference do you want to see that language<00:17:26.959> again<00:17:27.280> before<00:17:27.600> we<00:17:27.760> send<00:17:27.919> it<00:17:28.000> to 00:17:28.150 --> 00:17:28.160 align:start position:0% language again before we send it to 00:17:28.160 --> 00:17:30.950 align:start position:0% language again before we send it to council<00:17:28.559> are<00:17:28.640> you<00:17:28.799> comfortable<00:17:29.280> with 00:17:30.950 --> 00:17:30.960 align:start position:0% council are you comfortable with 00:17:30.960 --> 00:17:32.470 align:start position:0% council are you comfortable with i'm<00:17:31.360> all<00:17:31.440> right<00:17:31.679> if<00:17:31.840> you 00:17:32.470 --> 00:17:32.480 align:start position:0% i'm all right if you 00:17:32.480 --> 00:17:33.909 align:start position:0% i'm all right if you modify<00:17:33.120> that 00:17:33.909 --> 00:17:33.919 align:start position:0% modify that 00:17:33.919 --> 00:17:36.549 align:start position:0% modify that so<00:17:34.240> that<00:17:34.559> as<00:17:34.799> long<00:17:34.960> as<00:17:35.039> we<00:17:35.360> can<00:17:35.600> evaluate<00:17:36.400> the 00:17:36.549 --> 00:17:36.559 align:start position:0% so that as long as we can evaluate the 00:17:36.559 --> 00:17:37.270 align:start position:0% so that as long as we can evaluate the uh 00:17:37.270 --> 00:17:37.280 align:start position:0% uh 00:17:37.280 --> 00:17:41.350 align:start position:0% uh economic<00:17:38.000> and<00:17:38.160> tax<00:17:38.480> abatement<00:17:39.520> issues<00:17:39.919> on<00:17:40.080> it 00:17:41.350 --> 00:17:41.360 align:start position:0% economic and tax abatement issues on it 00:17:41.360 --> 00:17:43.190 align:start position:0% economic and tax abatement issues on it i'm<00:17:41.600> comfortable<00:17:42.320> if<00:17:42.400> you<00:17:42.559> just<00:17:42.880> let<00:17:43.039> the 00:17:43.190 --> 00:17:43.200 align:start position:0% i'm comfortable if you just let the 00:17:43.200 --> 00:17:47.270 align:start position:0% i'm comfortable if you just let the staff<00:17:43.520> do<00:17:43.679> it<00:17:43.919> and<00:17:44.080> modify<00:17:44.559> that<00:17:44.720> statement 00:17:47.270 --> 00:17:47.280 align:start position:0% staff do it and modify that statement 00:17:47.280 --> 00:17:48.789 align:start position:0% staff do it and modify that statement if<00:17:47.440> that's<00:17:47.679> if<00:17:48.000> you<00:17:48.080> want<00:17:48.240> to<00:17:48.320> do<00:17:48.480> you<00:17:48.559> want<00:17:48.720> to 00:17:48.789 --> 00:17:48.799 align:start position:0% if that's if you want to do you want to 00:17:48.799 --> 00:17:50.710 align:start position:0% if that's if you want to do you want to see<00:17:48.960> that<00:17:49.200> language<00:17:49.600> again<00:17:50.080> no<00:17:50.240> i<00:17:50.400> don't<00:17:50.559> want 00:17:50.710 --> 00:17:50.720 align:start position:0% see that language again no i don't want 00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:52.630 align:start position:0% see that language again no i don't want to<00:17:50.799> see<00:17:50.960> it<00:17:51.280> i<00:17:51.520> trust<00:17:51.760> the<00:17:51.919> staff<00:17:52.160> to<00:17:52.320> draw<00:17:52.480> it 00:17:52.630 --> 00:17:52.640 align:start position:0% to see it i trust the staff to draw it 00:17:52.640 --> 00:17:54.710 align:start position:0% to see it i trust the staff to draw it up<00:17:52.799> right<00:17:53.280> anybody<00:17:53.760> else 00:17:54.710 --> 00:17:54.720 align:start position:0% up right anybody else 00:17:54.720 --> 00:17:56.710 align:start position:0% up right anybody else have<00:17:54.880> any<00:17:55.039> problems 00:17:56.710 --> 00:17:56.720 align:start position:0% have any problems 00:17:56.720 --> 00:17:57.830 align:start position:0% have any problems otherwise 00:17:57.830 --> 00:17:57.840 align:start position:0% otherwise 00:17:57.840 --> 00:17:59.190 align:start position:0% otherwise and<00:17:58.000> yeah<00:17:58.400> if<00:17:58.480> you<00:17:58.640> don't<00:17:58.720> want<00:17:58.799> to<00:17:58.880> leave<00:17:59.039> it 00:17:59.190 --> 00:17:59.200 align:start position:0% and yeah if you don't want to leave it 00:17:59.200 --> 00:18:00.789 align:start position:0% and yeah if you don't want to leave it out<00:17:59.280> of<00:17:59.360> the<00:17:59.440> south<00:17:59.760> that's<00:18:00.000> fine 00:18:00.789 --> 00:18:00.799 align:start position:0% out of the south that's fine 00:18:00.799 --> 00:18:02.310 align:start position:0% out of the south that's fine all<00:18:00.880> right<00:18:01.200> because<00:18:01.760> i<00:18:01.919> don't<00:18:02.080> think<00:18:02.240> the 00:18:02.310 --> 00:18:02.320 align:start position:0% all right because i don't think the 00:18:02.320 --> 00:18:04.470 align:start position:0% all right because i don't think the south<00:18:02.559> server<00:18:02.960> have<00:18:03.120> an<00:18:03.280> issue<00:18:03.600> using<00:18:03.919> that 00:18:04.470 --> 00:18:04.480 align:start position:0% south server have an issue using that 00:18:04.480 --> 00:18:06.070 align:start position:0% south server have an issue using that right 00:18:06.070 --> 00:18:06.080 align:start position:0% right 00:18:06.080 --> 00:18:08.549 align:start position:0% right and<00:18:06.559> either<00:18:06.799> way<00:18:07.039> we'll<00:18:07.360> send<00:18:07.600> the<00:18:07.840> revised 00:18:08.549 --> 00:18:08.559 align:start position:0% and either way we'll send the revised 00:18:08.559 --> 00:18:10.630 align:start position:0% and either way we'll send the revised okay<00:18:09.200> we'll<00:18:09.360> send<00:18:09.520> the<00:18:09.679> revised<00:18:10.160> out<00:18:10.320> even<00:18:10.480> if 00:18:10.630 --> 00:18:10.640 align:start position:0% okay we'll send the revised out even if 00:18:10.640 --> 00:18:12.630 align:start position:0% okay we'll send the revised out even if you<00:18:10.720> approve<00:18:11.039> it<00:18:11.120> today<00:18:11.679> is<00:18:11.840> there<00:18:12.000> a<00:18:12.320> is<00:18:12.480> there 00:18:12.630 --> 00:18:12.640 align:start position:0% you approve it today is there a is there 00:18:12.640 --> 00:18:15.350 align:start position:0% you approve it today is there a is there a<00:18:12.799> motion<00:18:13.280> to<00:18:13.679> move<00:18:13.919> approval<00:18:14.640> based<00:18:14.880> on<00:18:15.039> those 00:18:15.350 --> 00:18:15.360 align:start position:0% a motion to move approval based on those 00:18:15.360 --> 00:18:17.750 align:start position:0% a motion to move approval based on those changes<00:18:15.840> suggested<00:18:16.320> by<00:18:16.480> the<00:18:16.559> board 00:18:17.750 --> 00:18:17.760 align:start position:0% changes suggested by the board 00:18:17.760 --> 00:18:21.110 align:start position:0% changes suggested by the board is<00:18:17.919> there<00:18:18.080> a<00:18:18.240> six<00:18:18.480> is<00:18:18.640> there<00:18:18.799> a<00:18:18.880> second 00:18:21.110 --> 00:18:21.120 align:start position:0% is there a six is there a second 00:18:21.120 --> 00:18:23.830 align:start position:0% is there a six is there a second motions<00:18:21.520> made<00:18:21.760> by<00:18:21.919> stephen<00:18:22.320> brown's<00:18:22.799> second 00:18:23.830 --> 00:18:23.840 align:start position:0% motions made by stephen brown's second 00:18:23.840 --> 00:18:25.750 align:start position:0% motions made by stephen brown's second dodger<00:18:24.240> butler 00:18:25.750 --> 00:18:25.760 align:start position:0% dodger butler 00:18:25.760 --> 00:18:26.830 align:start position:0% dodger butler any<00:18:25.919> further 00:18:26.830 --> 00:18:26.840 align:start position:0% any further 00:18:26.840 --> 00:18:28.630 align:start position:0% any further discussion 00:18:28.630 --> 00:18:28.640 align:start position:0% discussion 00:18:28.640 --> 00:18:30.789 align:start position:0% discussion call<00:18:28.880> for<00:18:29.039> a<00:18:29.120> vote<00:18:29.360> all<00:18:29.520> those<00:18:29.840> in<00:18:30.080> favor<00:18:30.480> say 00:18:30.789 --> 00:18:30.799 align:start position:0% call for a vote all those in favor say 00:18:30.799 --> 00:18:32.150 align:start position:0% call for a vote all those in favor say aye aye 00:18:32.150 --> 00:18:32.160 align:start position:0% aye aye 00:18:32.160 --> 00:18:34.870 align:start position:0% aye aye all<00:18:32.320> of<00:18:32.480> those<00:18:32.720> say<00:18:32.960> may 00:18:34.870 --> 00:18:34.880 align:start position:0% all of those say may 00:18:34.880 --> 00:18:37.190 align:start position:0% all of those say may and<00:18:35.200> motion<00:18:35.520> passes 00:18:37.190 --> 00:18:37.200 align:start position:0% and motion passes 00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:39.669 align:start position:0% and motion passes thank<00:18:37.440> you 00:18:39.669 --> 00:18:39.679 align:start position:0% 00:18:39.679 --> 00:18:40.950 align:start position:0% next 00:18:40.950 --> 00:18:40.960 align:start position:0% next 00:18:40.960 --> 00:18:43.510 align:start position:0% next is<00:18:41.200> item<00:18:41.679> 5<00:18:42.160> updated<00:18:42.720> discussion<00:18:43.200> on<00:18:43.360> the 00:18:43.510 --> 00:18:43.520 align:start position:0% is item 5 updated discussion on the 00:18:43.520 --> 00:18:47.590 align:start position:0% is item 5 updated discussion on the project's<00:18:44.080> in<00:18:44.320> progress 00:18:47.590 --> 00:18:47.600 align:start position:0% 00:18:47.600 --> 00:18:49.830 align:start position:0% good<00:18:47.760> afternoon<00:18:48.240> board<00:18:48.720> nolan<00:18:49.120> sosa<00:18:49.440> economic 00:18:49.830 --> 00:18:49.840 align:start position:0% good afternoon board nolan sosa economic 00:18:49.840 --> 00:18:51.669 align:start position:0% good afternoon board nolan sosa economic development<00:18:50.320> administrator<00:18:51.280> and<00:18:51.440> i'm<00:18:51.520> going 00:18:51.669 --> 00:18:51.679 align:start position:0% development administrator and i'm going 00:18:51.679 --> 00:18:53.190 align:start position:0% development administrator and i'm going to<00:18:51.760> provide<00:18:52.240> just 00:18:53.190 --> 00:18:53.200 align:start position:0% to provide just 00:18:53.200 --> 00:18:55.750 align:start position:0% to provide just a<00:18:53.280> brief<00:18:53.760> update<00:18:54.480> on<00:18:54.720> the<00:18:54.880> projects<00:18:55.520> in 00:18:55.750 --> 00:18:55.760 align:start position:0% a brief update on the projects in 00:18:55.760 --> 00:18:58.070 align:start position:0% a brief update on the projects in progress 00:18:58.070 --> 00:18:58.080 align:start position:0% progress 00:18:58.080 --> 00:19:01.350 align:start position:0% progress we<00:18:58.320> currently<00:18:58.799> have<00:18:59.200> 11<00:19:00.160> active<00:19:00.960> tears 00:19:01.350 --> 00:19:01.360 align:start position:0% we currently have 11 active tears 00:19:01.360 --> 00:19:03.909 align:start position:0% we currently have 11 active tears projects<00:19:02.320> in<00:19:02.480> the<00:19:02.799> north 00:19:03.909 --> 00:19:03.919 align:start position:0% projects in the north 00:19:03.919 --> 00:19:05.830 align:start position:0% projects in the north i<00:19:04.000> wanted<00:19:04.320> to<00:19:04.400> draw<00:19:04.640> your<00:19:04.880> attention<00:19:05.600> very 00:19:05.830 --> 00:19:05.840 align:start position:0% i wanted to draw your attention very 00:19:05.840 --> 00:19:10.070 align:start position:0% i wanted to draw your attention very briefly<00:19:06.720> to<00:19:06.960> 124<00:19:08.160> west<00:19:08.559> 4th<00:19:08.960> street<00:19:09.600> that's<00:19:10.000> a 00:19:10.070 --> 00:19:10.080 align:start position:0% briefly to 124 west 4th street that's a 00:19:10.080 --> 00:19:12.870 align:start position:0% briefly to 124 west 4th street that's a project<00:19:10.400> that's<00:19:10.640> received<00:19:11.280> two<00:19:11.679> separate 00:19:12.870 --> 00:19:12.880 align:start position:0% project that's received two separate 00:19:12.880 --> 00:19:15.350 align:start position:0% project that's received two separate tiers<00:19:13.520> grants<00:19:14.160> for<00:19:14.320> the<00:19:14.480> same<00:19:14.880> subject 00:19:15.350 --> 00:19:15.360 align:start position:0% tiers grants for the same subject 00:19:15.360 --> 00:19:16.789 align:start position:0% tiers grants for the same subject address 00:19:16.789 --> 00:19:16.799 align:start position:0% address 00:19:16.799 --> 00:19:17.990 align:start position:0% address then<00:19:16.960> they<00:19:17.200> actually<00:19:17.520> have<00:19:17.679> different 00:19:17.990 --> 00:19:18.000 align:start position:0% then they actually have different 00:19:18.000 --> 00:19:20.789 align:start position:0% then they actually have different timelines<00:19:18.960> they<00:19:19.120> were<00:19:19.280> awarded<00:19:19.760> in<00:19:19.840> one<00:19:20.160> cycle 00:19:20.789 --> 00:19:20.799 align:start position:0% timelines they were awarded in one cycle 00:19:20.799 --> 00:19:22.710 align:start position:0% timelines they were awarded in one cycle and<00:19:20.880> then<00:19:21.039> were<00:19:21.200> awarded<00:19:21.679> a<00:19:21.760> separate<00:19:22.080> grant 00:19:22.710 --> 00:19:22.720 align:start position:0% and then were awarded a separate grant 00:19:22.720 --> 00:19:23.350 align:start position:0% and then were awarded a separate grant in 00:19:23.350 --> 00:19:23.360 align:start position:0% in 00:19:23.360 --> 00:19:25.590 align:start position:0% in in a<00:19:23.760> separate<00:19:24.160> cycle 00:19:25.590 --> 00:19:25.600 align:start position:0% in a separate cycle 00:19:25.600 --> 00:19:26.549 align:start position:0% in a separate cycle the 00:19:26.549 --> 00:19:26.559 align:start position:0% the 00:19:26.559 --> 00:19:28.630 align:start position:0% the grant<00:19:26.880> that<00:19:27.039> is<00:19:27.200> coming<00:19:27.520> up<00:19:27.679> for<00:19:27.840> expiration 00:19:28.630 --> 00:19:28.640 align:start position:0% grant that is coming up for expiration 00:19:28.640 --> 00:19:30.630 align:start position:0% grant that is coming up for expiration here<00:19:28.960> in<00:19:29.039> the<00:19:29.120> next<00:19:29.360> couple<00:19:29.600> of<00:19:29.679> months 00:19:30.630 --> 00:19:30.640 align:start position:0% here in the next couple of months 00:19:30.640 --> 00:19:33.590 align:start position:0% here in the next couple of months she<00:19:30.880> has<00:19:31.039> requested<00:19:31.679> an<00:19:31.840> extension<00:19:32.880> of<00:19:33.039> her 00:19:33.590 --> 00:19:33.600 align:start position:0% she has requested an extension of her 00:19:33.600 --> 00:19:35.110 align:start position:0% she has requested an extension of her project<00:19:34.000> timeline 00:19:35.110 --> 00:19:35.120 align:start position:0% project timeline 00:19:35.120 --> 00:19:37.110 align:start position:0% project timeline for<00:19:35.280> two<00:19:35.520> reasons 00:19:37.110 --> 00:19:37.120 align:start position:0% for two reasons 00:19:37.120 --> 00:19:39.750 align:start position:0% for two reasons one<00:19:38.240> due<00:19:38.480> to<00:19:38.559> the<00:19:38.720> supply<00:19:39.120> chain<00:19:39.360> issues 00:19:39.750 --> 00:19:39.760 align:start position:0% one due to the supply chain issues 00:19:39.760 --> 00:19:42.710 align:start position:0% one due to the supply chain issues caused<00:19:40.000> by<00:19:40.240> cobit<00:19:40.559> 19<00:19:41.520> and<00:19:41.679> then<00:19:42.080> two<00:19:42.400> due<00:19:42.559> to 00:19:42.710 --> 00:19:42.720 align:start position:0% caused by cobit 19 and then two due to 00:19:42.720 --> 00:19:44.710 align:start position:0% caused by cobit 19 and then two due to some<00:19:42.960> personal<00:19:43.360> medical<00:19:43.679> circumstances 00:19:44.710 --> 00:19:44.720 align:start position:0% some personal medical circumstances 00:19:44.720 --> 00:19:46.950 align:start position:0% some personal medical circumstances she's<00:19:45.039> been<00:19:45.280> unable<00:19:45.679> to<00:19:46.080> totally<00:19:46.559> complete 00:19:46.950 --> 00:19:46.960 align:start position:0% she's been unable to totally complete 00:19:46.960 --> 00:19:49.029 align:start position:0% she's been unable to totally complete the<00:19:47.120> project<00:19:47.679> but<00:19:47.840> she<00:19:48.080> has<00:19:48.320> substantially 00:19:49.029 --> 00:19:49.039 align:start position:0% the project but she has substantially 00:19:49.039 --> 00:19:52.070 align:start position:0% the project but she has substantially completed<00:19:49.520> the<00:19:49.600> work<00:19:50.240> so<00:19:50.880> she's<00:19:51.120> requested<00:19:51.760> a 00:19:52.070 --> 00:19:52.080 align:start position:0% completed the work so she's requested a 00:19:52.080 --> 00:19:54.150 align:start position:0% completed the work so she's requested a six<00:19:52.320> months<00:19:52.640> extension<00:19:53.520> and<00:19:53.679> we<00:19:53.840> will<00:19:54.000> be 00:19:54.150 --> 00:19:54.160 align:start position:0% six months extension and we will be 00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:55.590 align:start position:0% six months extension and we will be bringing<00:19:54.480> in<00:19:54.720> that<00:19:54.880> to<00:19:55.039> the<00:19:55.120> board<00:19:55.360> for 00:19:55.590 --> 00:19:55.600 align:start position:0% bringing in that to the board for 00:19:55.600 --> 00:19:57.750 align:start position:0% bringing in that to the board for consideration<00:19:56.400> i<00:19:56.559> just<00:19:56.720> felt<00:19:57.200> we're<00:19:57.440> on<00:19:57.520> this 00:19:57.750 --> 00:19:57.760 align:start position:0% consideration i just felt we're on this 00:19:57.760 --> 00:19:59.350 align:start position:0% consideration i just felt we're on this page<00:19:58.080> we're<00:19:58.240> talking<00:19:58.480> about<00:19:58.799> projects<00:19:59.200> in 00:19:59.350 --> 00:19:59.360 align:start position:0% page we're talking about projects in 00:19:59.360 --> 00:20:00.950 align:start position:0% page we're talking about projects in progress<00:20:00.000> i<00:20:00.080> wanted<00:20:00.400> at<00:20:00.480> least<00:20:00.720> give<00:20:00.880> the 00:20:00.950 --> 00:20:00.960 align:start position:0% progress i wanted at least give the 00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:02.710 align:start position:0% progress i wanted at least give the boards<00:20:01.280> a<00:20:01.679> heads<00:20:01.919> up<00:20:02.080> that<00:20:02.240> that's<00:20:02.400> something 00:20:02.710 --> 00:20:02.720 align:start position:0% boards a heads up that that's something 00:20:02.720 --> 00:20:04.470 align:start position:0% boards a heads up that that's something that<00:20:03.120> staff<00:20:03.440> will<00:20:03.600> be<00:20:03.760> taking<00:20:04.240> for 00:20:04.470 --> 00:20:04.480 align:start position:0% that staff will be taking for 00:20:04.480 --> 00:20:06.149 align:start position:0% that staff will be taking for consideration<00:20:05.120> at<00:20:05.200> a<00:20:05.280> later<00:20:05.600> time<00:20:05.919> but<00:20:06.080> i 00:20:06.149 --> 00:20:06.159 align:start position:0% consideration at a later time but i 00:20:06.159 --> 00:20:07.830 align:start position:0% consideration at a later time but i don't<00:20:06.240> want<00:20:06.400> to<00:20:06.480> go<00:20:06.720> too<00:20:06.960> far<00:20:07.200> into<00:20:07.360> detail 00:20:07.830 --> 00:20:07.840 align:start position:0% don't want to go too far into detail 00:20:07.840 --> 00:20:09.750 align:start position:0% don't want to go too far into detail because<00:20:08.080> that<00:20:08.159> wasn't<00:20:08.480> on<00:20:08.559> the<00:20:08.720> agenda<00:20:09.200> today 00:20:09.750 --> 00:20:09.760 align:start position:0% because that wasn't on the agenda today 00:20:09.760 --> 00:20:12.390 align:start position:0% because that wasn't on the agenda today what<00:20:09.919> does<00:20:10.080> she<00:20:10.320> lack<00:20:10.720> what<00:20:10.960> is<00:20:11.039> she 00:20:12.390 --> 00:20:12.400 align:start position:0% what does she lack what is she 00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:15.190 align:start position:0% what does she lack what is she what<00:20:12.640> has<00:20:12.880> she<00:20:13.039> not<00:20:13.280> completed 00:20:15.190 --> 00:20:15.200 align:start position:0% what has she not completed 00:20:15.200 --> 00:20:17.350 align:start position:0% what has she not completed that<00:20:15.760> i<00:20:16.000> will<00:20:16.320> get<00:20:16.559> that<00:20:16.720> information 00:20:17.350 --> 00:20:17.360 align:start position:0% that i will get that information 00:20:17.360 --> 00:20:18.870 align:start position:0% that i will get that information together<00:20:17.760> and<00:20:18.000> and<00:20:18.159> present<00:20:18.480> that<00:20:18.640> to<00:20:18.799> the 00:20:18.870 --> 00:20:18.880 align:start position:0% together and and present that to the 00:20:18.880 --> 00:20:21.110 align:start position:0% together and and present that to the board<00:20:19.520> the<00:20:19.679> only<00:20:20.000> reason<00:20:20.799> i'm<00:20:20.960> not 00:20:21.110 --> 00:20:21.120 align:start position:0% board the only reason i'm not 00:20:21.120 --> 00:20:22.710 align:start position:0% board the only reason i'm not comfortable<00:20:21.600> going<00:20:21.840> into<00:20:22.000> that<00:20:22.240> discussion 00:20:22.710 --> 00:20:22.720 align:start position:0% comfortable going into that discussion 00:20:22.720 --> 00:20:24.789 align:start position:0% comfortable going into that discussion today<00:20:23.360> simply<00:20:23.679> because<00:20:23.919> that<00:20:24.080> wasn't<00:20:24.400> posted 00:20:24.789 --> 00:20:24.799 align:start position:0% today simply because that wasn't posted 00:20:24.799 --> 00:20:26.149 align:start position:0% today simply because that wasn't posted on<00:20:24.880> the<00:20:24.960> agenda 00:20:26.149 --> 00:20:26.159 align:start position:0% on the agenda 00:20:26.159 --> 00:20:28.549 align:start position:0% on the agenda for<00:20:26.559> for<00:20:26.960> us<00:20:27.120> to<00:20:27.280> discuss<00:20:27.760> it's<00:20:28.000> not<00:20:28.159> an<00:20:28.320> action 00:20:28.549 --> 00:20:28.559 align:start position:0% for for us to discuss it's not an action 00:20:28.559 --> 00:20:30.950 align:start position:0% for for us to discuss it's not an action item<00:20:28.880> today<00:20:29.520> so<00:20:29.760> i<00:20:29.840> just<00:20:30.000> want<00:20:30.159> to<00:20:30.240> kind<00:20:30.400> of 00:20:30.950 --> 00:20:30.960 align:start position:0% item today so i just want to kind of 00:20:30.960 --> 00:20:32.789 align:start position:0% item today so i just want to kind of give<00:20:31.120> you<00:20:31.280> guys<00:20:31.520> a<00:20:31.600> heads<00:20:31.919> up<00:20:32.240> but<00:20:32.480> we'll<00:20:32.640> have 00:20:32.789 --> 00:20:32.799 align:start position:0% give you guys a heads up but we'll have 00:20:32.799 --> 00:20:34.470 align:start position:0% give you guys a heads up but we'll have a<00:20:32.880> more<00:20:33.120> formal<00:20:33.440> discussion<00:20:33.919> when<00:20:34.080> we<00:20:34.240> take 00:20:34.470 --> 00:20:34.480 align:start position:0% a more formal discussion when we take 00:20:34.480 --> 00:20:39.909 align:start position:0% a more formal discussion when we take action<00:20:34.720> on<00:20:34.880> that<00:20:35.280> during<00:20:35.520> the<00:20:35.679> 25th<00:20:36.159> meeting 00:20:39.909 --> 00:20:39.919 align:start position:0% 00:20:39.919 --> 00:20:41.750 align:start position:0% and<00:20:40.080> these<00:20:40.320> are<00:20:40.400> the<00:20:40.480> projects<00:20:40.960> in<00:20:41.039> progress 00:20:41.750 --> 00:20:41.760 align:start position:0% and these are the projects in progress 00:20:41.760 --> 00:20:43.909 align:start position:0% and these are the projects in progress you'll<00:20:42.000> notice<00:20:42.480> that<00:20:43.039> at<00:20:43.120> the<00:20:43.280> bottom<00:20:43.600> here 00:20:43.909 --> 00:20:43.919 align:start position:0% you'll notice that at the bottom here 00:20:43.919 --> 00:20:45.590 align:start position:0% you'll notice that at the bottom here we've<00:20:44.159> added<00:20:44.480> the<00:20:44.640> new<00:20:44.880> projects<00:20:45.360> that<00:20:45.440> were 00:20:45.590 --> 00:20:45.600 align:start position:0% we've added the new projects that were 00:20:45.600 --> 00:20:47.750 align:start position:0% we've added the new projects that were approved<00:20:46.000> during<00:20:46.240> the<00:20:46.400> previous<00:20:46.880> tier<00:20:47.120> cycle 00:20:47.750 --> 00:20:47.760 align:start position:0% approved during the previous tier cycle 00:20:47.760 --> 00:20:50.070 align:start position:0% approved during the previous tier cycle lucio<00:20:48.240> and<00:20:48.320> suns<00:20:48.640> roofing<00:20:49.120> tritex<00:20:49.679> fence 00:20:50.070 --> 00:20:50.080 align:start position:0% lucio and suns roofing tritex fence 00:20:50.080 --> 00:20:51.909 align:start position:0% lucio and suns roofing tritex fence company<00:20:50.640> and<00:20:50.720> then<00:20:50.960> of<00:20:51.039> course<00:20:51.360> uh<00:20:51.520> wynn<00:20:51.760> and 00:20:51.909 --> 00:20:51.919 align:start position:0% company and then of course uh wynn and 00:20:51.919 --> 00:20:54.390 align:start position:0% company and then of course uh wynn and allison<00:20:52.320> palmer's<00:20:53.120> properties<00:20:53.919> are<00:20:54.080> doing 00:20:54.390 --> 00:20:54.400 align:start position:0% allison palmer's properties are doing 00:20:54.400 --> 00:20:56.230 align:start position:0% allison palmer's properties are doing their<00:20:54.559> project<00:20:54.880> on<00:20:55.039> third<00:20:55.360> street<00:20:55.919> so<00:20:56.080> we're 00:20:56.230 --> 00:20:56.240 align:start position:0% their project on third street so we're 00:20:56.240 --> 00:20:59.510 align:start position:0% their project on third street so we're excited<00:20:56.640> about<00:20:56.799> those<00:20:56.960> projects 00:20:59.510 --> 00:20:59.520 align:start position:0% 00:20:59.520 --> 00:21:01.350 align:start position:0% we<00:20:59.679> have<00:20:59.840> five<00:21:00.159> active<00:21:00.480> projects<00:21:00.960> right<00:21:01.120> now 00:21:01.350 --> 00:21:01.360 align:start position:0% we have five active projects right now 00:21:01.360 --> 00:21:03.270 align:start position:0% we have five active projects right now in<00:21:01.440> the<00:21:01.600> tourist<00:21:01.919> south 00:21:03.270 --> 00:21:03.280 align:start position:0% in the tourist south 00:21:03.280 --> 00:21:05.110 align:start position:0% in the tourist south you'll<00:21:03.520> notice<00:21:03.840> that<00:21:03.919> we<00:21:04.080> actually<00:21:04.480> added 00:21:05.110 --> 00:21:05.120 align:start position:0% you'll notice that we actually added 00:21:05.120 --> 00:21:07.190 align:start position:0% you'll notice that we actually added three<00:21:05.440> projects<00:21:05.840> to<00:21:06.000> tour<00:21:06.240> south<00:21:06.799> during<00:21:07.039> the 00:21:07.190 --> 00:21:07.200 align:start position:0% three projects to tour south during the 00:21:07.200 --> 00:21:10.070 align:start position:0% three projects to tour south during the last<00:21:07.440> cycle 00:21:10.070 --> 00:21:10.080 align:start position:0% 00:21:10.080 --> 00:21:11.669 align:start position:0% and<00:21:10.240> i'm<00:21:10.320> very<00:21:10.559> excited<00:21:10.960> to<00:21:11.039> report<00:21:11.440> that 00:21:11.669 --> 00:21:11.679 align:start position:0% and i'm very excited to report that 00:21:11.679 --> 00:21:14.070 align:start position:0% and i'm very excited to report that since<00:21:11.919> the<00:21:12.080> last<00:21:12.320> time<00:21:12.480> we<00:21:12.640> met<00:21:12.880> in<00:21:13.039> august<00:21:13.840> we 00:21:14.070 --> 00:21:14.080 align:start position:0% since the last time we met in august we 00:21:14.080 --> 00:21:16.950 align:start position:0% since the last time we met in august we have<00:21:14.400> completed<00:21:15.039> four<00:21:15.360> tours<00:21:15.840> projects<00:21:16.720> so 00:21:16.950 --> 00:21:16.960 align:start position:0% have completed four tours projects so 00:21:16.960 --> 00:21:19.029 align:start position:0% have completed four tours projects so the<00:21:17.039> first<00:21:17.360> project<00:21:17.840> in<00:21:17.919> the<00:21:18.080> south 00:21:19.029 --> 00:21:19.039 align:start position:0% the first project in the south 00:21:19.039 --> 00:21:19.909 align:start position:0% the first project in the south area 00:21:19.909 --> 00:21:19.919 align:start position:0% area 00:21:19.919 --> 00:21:22.390 align:start position:0% area is<00:21:20.320> vita<00:21:20.880> hair<00:21:21.200> studio<00:21:21.600> when<00:21:21.840> they<00:21:22.000> applied 00:21:22.390 --> 00:21:22.400 align:start position:0% is vita hair studio when they applied 00:21:22.400 --> 00:21:24.710 align:start position:0% is vita hair studio when they applied they<00:21:22.559> applied<00:21:22.960> as<00:21:23.120> roots<00:21:23.520> hair<00:21:23.760> salon 00:21:24.710 --> 00:21:24.720 align:start position:0% they applied as roots hair salon 00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:26.149 align:start position:0% they applied as roots hair salon but<00:21:24.880> they<00:21:25.120> completed<00:21:25.520> the<00:21:25.679> facade 00:21:26.149 --> 00:21:26.159 align:start position:0% but they completed the facade 00:21:26.159 --> 00:21:27.990 align:start position:0% but they completed the facade improvements<00:21:26.720> they<00:21:26.960> painted<00:21:27.360> they<00:21:27.600> installed 00:21:27.990 --> 00:21:28.000 align:start position:0% improvements they painted they installed 00:21:28.000 --> 00:21:31.190 align:start position:0% improvements they painted they installed new<00:21:28.159> doors<00:21:28.559> and<00:21:28.840> windows<00:21:29.919> so<00:21:30.080> that<00:21:30.720> facade 00:21:31.190 --> 00:21:31.200 align:start position:0% new doors and windows so that facade 00:21:31.200 --> 00:21:33.029 align:start position:0% new doors and windows so that facade looks<00:21:31.520> great<00:21:31.840> it's<00:21:32.000> right<00:21:32.240> here<00:21:32.400> on<00:21:32.559> chadburn 00:21:33.029 --> 00:21:33.039 align:start position:0% looks great it's right here on chadburn 00:21:33.039 --> 00:21:34.710 align:start position:0% looks great it's right here on chadburn street<00:21:33.600> kind<00:21:33.760> of<00:21:33.840> near<00:21:34.080> our<00:21:34.240> economic 00:21:34.710 --> 00:21:34.720 align:start position:0% street kind of near our economic 00:21:34.720 --> 00:21:36.310 align:start position:0% street kind of near our economic development<00:21:35.200> building<00:21:35.440> so<00:21:35.600> i<00:21:35.679> get<00:21:35.840> to<00:21:35.919> pass<00:21:36.159> by 00:21:36.310 --> 00:21:36.320 align:start position:0% development building so i get to pass by 00:21:36.320 --> 00:21:39.430 align:start position:0% development building so i get to pass by it<00:21:36.400> on<00:21:36.480> my<00:21:36.640> way<00:21:36.720> to<00:21:36.799> work<00:21:37.039> every<00:21:37.280> morning 00:21:39.430 --> 00:21:39.440 align:start position:0% it on my way to work every morning 00:21:39.440 --> 00:21:41.830 align:start position:0% it on my way to work every morning we<00:21:39.600> have<00:21:39.760> old<00:21:40.000> central<00:21:40.480> firehouse<00:21:41.600> they 00:21:41.830 --> 00:21:41.840 align:start position:0% we have old central firehouse they 00:21:41.840 --> 00:21:44.710 align:start position:0% we have old central firehouse they completed<00:21:42.799> exterior<00:21:43.440> landscaping<00:21:44.480> they 00:21:44.710 --> 00:21:44.720 align:start position:0% completed exterior landscaping they 00:21:44.720 --> 00:21:47.190 align:start position:0% completed exterior landscaping they installed<00:21:45.440> ada<00:21:46.080> ramps 00:21:47.190 --> 00:21:47.200 align:start position:0% installed ada ramps 00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:48.549 align:start position:0% installed ada ramps some<00:21:47.360> new<00:21:47.600> lighting 00:21:48.549 --> 00:21:48.559 align:start position:0% some new lighting 00:21:48.559 --> 00:21:50.310 align:start position:0% some new lighting and<00:21:48.720> they<00:21:48.880> of<00:21:48.960> course<00:21:49.360> installed<00:21:49.760> the<00:21:49.919> patio 00:21:50.310 --> 00:21:50.320 align:start position:0% and they of course installed the patio 00:21:50.320 --> 00:21:54.789 align:start position:0% and they of course installed the patio there<00:21:50.880> for<00:21:51.039> their<00:21:51.280> facility 00:21:54.789 --> 00:21:54.799 align:start position:0% 00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:56.549 align:start position:0% we<00:21:54.960> have<00:21:55.200> steve<00:21:55.520> stengo<00:21:56.000> so<00:21:56.159> if<00:21:56.320> you<00:21:56.400> all 00:21:56.549 --> 00:21:56.559 align:start position:0% we have steve stengo so if you all 00:21:56.559 --> 00:21:58.630 align:start position:0% we have steve stengo so if you all recall<00:21:57.360> steve<00:21:57.679> stengel<00:21:58.000> was<00:21:58.240> actually<00:21:58.480> an 00:21:58.630 --> 00:21:58.640 align:start position:0% recall steve stengel was actually an 00:21:58.640 --> 00:22:00.870 align:start position:0% recall steve stengel was actually an applicant<00:21:59.120> during<00:21:59.520> just<00:21:59.760> this<00:22:00.000> last<00:22:00.320> cycle 00:22:00.870 --> 00:22:00.880 align:start position:0% applicant during just this last cycle 00:22:00.880 --> 00:22:02.390 align:start position:0% applicant during just this last cycle but<00:22:01.039> since<00:22:01.200> the<00:22:01.360> scope<00:22:01.600> of<00:22:01.679> this<00:22:01.919> project<00:22:02.240> was 00:22:02.390 --> 00:22:02.400 align:start position:0% but since the scope of this project was 00:22:02.400 --> 00:22:04.549 align:start position:0% but since the scope of this project was rather<00:22:02.640> small<00:22:02.960> it<00:22:03.039> was<00:22:03.360> a<00:22:03.600> minor<00:22:04.240> window 00:22:04.549 --> 00:22:04.559 align:start position:0% rather small it was a minor window 00:22:04.559 --> 00:22:06.549 align:start position:0% rather small it was a minor window rehabilitation<00:22:05.520> those<00:22:05.760> alley-facing 00:22:06.549 --> 00:22:06.559 align:start position:0% rehabilitation those alley-facing 00:22:06.559 --> 00:22:07.830 align:start position:0% rehabilitation those alley-facing windows 00:22:07.830 --> 00:22:07.840 align:start position:0% windows 00:22:07.840 --> 00:22:09.909 align:start position:0% windows he<00:22:08.000> was<00:22:08.159> very<00:22:08.400> prudent<00:22:08.880> came<00:22:09.120> in<00:22:09.440> did<00:22:09.679> those 00:22:09.909 --> 00:22:09.919 align:start position:0% he was very prudent came in did those 00:22:09.919 --> 00:22:12.149 align:start position:0% he was very prudent came in did those improvements<00:22:10.400> and<00:22:10.559> so<00:22:10.720> he<00:22:10.880> completed<00:22:11.360> that 00:22:12.149 --> 00:22:12.159 align:start position:0% improvements and so he completed that 00:22:12.159 --> 00:22:14.870 align:start position:0% improvements and so he completed that before<00:22:12.400> the<00:22:12.559> next<00:22:12.799> meeting 00:22:14.870 --> 00:22:14.880 align:start position:0% before the next meeting 00:22:14.880 --> 00:22:17.029 align:start position:0% before the next meeting and<00:22:15.120> finally<00:22:15.600> concho<00:22:16.159> venue<00:22:16.640> which<00:22:16.880> is 00:22:17.029 --> 00:22:17.039 align:start position:0% and finally concho venue which is 00:22:17.039 --> 00:22:18.710 align:start position:0% and finally concho venue which is actually<00:22:17.360> right<00:22:17.600> next<00:22:17.840> door<00:22:18.080> to<00:22:18.159> our<00:22:18.240> economic 00:22:18.710 --> 00:22:18.720 align:start position:0% actually right next door to our economic 00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:20.710 align:start position:0% actually right next door to our economic development<00:22:19.200> building<00:22:20.000> did<00:22:20.240> facade 00:22:20.710 --> 00:22:20.720 align:start position:0% development building did facade 00:22:20.720 --> 00:22:23.029 align:start position:0% development building did facade improvements<00:22:21.280> new<00:22:21.600> sign<00:22:21.919> installation 00:22:23.029 --> 00:22:23.039 align:start position:0% improvements new sign installation 00:22:23.039 --> 00:22:24.149 align:start position:0% improvements new sign installation lighting 00:22:24.149 --> 00:22:24.159 align:start position:0% lighting 00:22:24.159 --> 00:22:24.950 align:start position:0% lighting so 00:22:24.950 --> 00:22:24.960 align:start position:0% so 00:22:24.960 --> 00:22:26.470 align:start position:0% so that<00:22:25.120> will<00:22:25.280> be<00:22:25.440> an<00:22:25.600> event<00:22:25.919> venue<00:22:26.240> that<00:22:26.400> they 00:22:26.470 --> 00:22:26.480 align:start position:0% that will be an event venue that they 00:22:26.480 --> 00:22:28.870 align:start position:0% that will be an event venue that they hope<00:22:26.720> to<00:22:26.880> open<00:22:27.360> uh<00:22:27.679> very<00:22:27.919> soon<00:22:28.400> so<00:22:28.640> we're 00:22:28.870 --> 00:22:28.880 align:start position:0% hope to open uh very soon so we're 00:22:28.880 --> 00:22:30.710 align:start position:0% hope to open uh very soon so we're excited<00:22:29.280> for<00:22:29.440> them<00:22:30.000> and<00:22:30.159> i'm<00:22:30.320> happy<00:22:30.559> to 00:22:30.710 --> 00:22:30.720 align:start position:0% excited for them and i'm happy to 00:22:30.720 --> 00:22:33.350 align:start position:0% excited for them and i'm happy to entertain<00:22:31.120> any<00:22:31.360> questions<00:22:31.919> on<00:22:32.559> any<00:22:32.799> projects 00:22:33.350 --> 00:22:33.360 align:start position:0% entertain any questions on any projects 00:22:33.360 --> 00:22:34.630 align:start position:0% entertain any questions on any projects in<00:22:33.520> progress 00:22:34.630 --> 00:22:34.640 align:start position:0% in progress 00:22:34.640 --> 00:22:35.830 align:start position:0% in progress um 00:22:35.830 --> 00:22:35.840 align:start position:0% um 00:22:35.840 --> 00:22:37.750 align:start position:0% um that<00:22:36.000> you<00:22:36.080> all<00:22:36.240> might<00:22:36.400> have 00:22:37.750 --> 00:22:37.760 align:start position:0% that you all might have 00:22:37.760 --> 00:22:39.190 align:start position:0% that you all might have are<00:22:37.840> there<00:22:38.000> any<00:22:38.240> questions<00:22:38.720> on<00:22:38.799> any<00:22:39.039> of<00:22:39.120> the 00:22:39.190 --> 00:22:39.200 align:start position:0% are there any questions on any of the 00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:42.789 align:start position:0% are there any questions on any of the projects<00:22:39.919> that<00:22:40.080> are<00:22:40.240> ongoing 00:22:42.789 --> 00:22:42.799 align:start position:0% 00:22:42.799 --> 00:22:43.830 align:start position:0% thank<00:22:42.960> you<00:22:43.120> all 00:22:43.830 --> 00:22:43.840 align:start position:0% thank you all 00:22:43.840 --> 00:22:47.270 align:start position:0% thank you all thank<00:22:44.080> you<00:22:44.159> mr<00:22:44.400> wilson 00:22:47.270 --> 00:22:47.280 align:start position:0% 00:22:47.280 --> 00:22:51.110 align:start position:0% director's<00:22:47.760> report 00:22:51.110 --> 00:22:51.120 align:start position:0% 00:22:51.120 --> 00:22:53.029 align:start position:0% i<00:22:51.280> actually<00:22:51.840> don't<00:22:52.080> have<00:22:52.240> anything<00:22:52.640> today 00:22:53.029 --> 00:22:53.039 align:start position:0% i actually don't have anything today 00:22:53.039 --> 00:22:55.190 align:start position:0% i actually don't have anything today other<00:22:53.360> than<00:22:53.919> just<00:22:54.159> reminding<00:22:54.640> you<00:22:54.720> that<00:22:54.880> this 00:22:55.190 --> 00:22:55.200 align:start position:0% other than just reminding you that this 00:22:55.200 --> 00:22:57.430 align:start position:0% other than just reminding you that this this<00:22:55.360> was<00:22:55.600> a<00:22:55.679> special<00:22:56.000> meeting 00:22:57.430 --> 00:22:57.440 align:start position:0% this was a special meeting 00:22:57.440 --> 00:22:59.430 align:start position:0% this was a special meeting primarily<00:22:58.080> to 00:22:59.430 --> 00:22:59.440 align:start position:0% primarily to 00:22:59.440 --> 00:23:02.549 align:start position:0% primarily to address<00:22:59.840> those<00:23:00.080> policy<00:23:00.640> issues<00:23:01.520> i<00:23:01.600> think 00:23:02.549 --> 00:23:02.559 align:start position:0% address those policy issues i think 00:23:02.559 --> 00:23:04.630 align:start position:0% address those policy issues i think the<00:23:02.799> timing<00:23:03.120> didn't<00:23:03.440> work<00:23:03.679> out<00:23:03.919> our<00:23:04.159> original 00:23:04.630 --> 00:23:04.640 align:start position:0% the timing didn't work out our original 00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:06.149 align:start position:0% the timing didn't work out our original intent 00:23:06.149 --> 00:23:06.159 align:start position:0% intent 00:23:06.159 --> 00:23:08.390 align:start position:0% intent was<00:23:06.320> to<00:23:06.480> have<00:23:06.720> those<00:23:07.039> approved<00:23:07.760> in<00:23:07.919> time<00:23:08.240> for 00:23:08.390 --> 00:23:08.400 align:start position:0% was to have those approved in time for 00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:10.950 align:start position:0% was to have those approved in time for this<00:23:08.640> cycle<00:23:09.520> of<00:23:09.840> the<00:23:10.000> projects<00:23:10.480> you<00:23:10.640> guys<00:23:10.799> will 00:23:10.950 --> 00:23:10.960 align:start position:0% this cycle of the projects you guys will 00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:13.590 align:start position:0% this cycle of the projects you guys will be<00:23:11.440> considering<00:23:12.000> at<00:23:12.080> your<00:23:12.240> next<00:23:12.480> meeting 00:23:13.590 --> 00:23:13.600 align:start position:0% be considering at your next meeting 00:23:13.600 --> 00:23:15.110 align:start position:0% be considering at your next meeting just<00:23:13.840> because<00:23:14.159> of 00:23:15.110 --> 00:23:15.120 align:start position:0% just because of 00:23:15.120 --> 00:23:17.350 align:start position:0% just because of some<00:23:15.360> covert<00:23:15.760> things<00:23:16.240> and<00:23:16.960> the<00:23:17.120> way<00:23:17.280> the 00:23:17.350 --> 00:23:17.360 align:start position:0% some covert things and the way the 00:23:17.360 --> 00:23:19.750 align:start position:0% some covert things and the way the meetings<00:23:17.760> fell<00:23:18.000> in<00:23:18.080> december 00:23:19.750 --> 00:23:19.760 align:start position:0% meetings fell in december 00:23:19.760 --> 00:23:21.430 align:start position:0% meetings fell in december we<00:23:19.919> weren't<00:23:20.159> able<00:23:20.320> to<00:23:20.400> do<00:23:20.640> that<00:23:20.880> because<00:23:21.280> like 00:23:21.430 --> 00:23:21.440 align:start position:0% we weren't able to do that because like 00:23:21.440 --> 00:23:22.870 align:start position:0% we weren't able to do that because like i<00:23:21.520> said<00:23:21.679> earlier<00:23:22.080> these<00:23:22.240> do<00:23:22.480> have<00:23:22.559> to<00:23:22.640> go<00:23:22.799> to 00:23:22.870 --> 00:23:22.880 align:start position:0% i said earlier these do have to go to 00:23:22.880 --> 00:23:24.789 align:start position:0% i said earlier these do have to go to the<00:23:22.960> city<00:23:23.200> council<00:23:23.679> first 00:23:24.789 --> 00:23:24.799 align:start position:0% the city council first 00:23:24.799 --> 00:23:27.270 align:start position:0% the city council first so<00:23:25.039> any<00:23:25.200> of<00:23:25.280> these<00:23:25.600> policy<00:23:26.159> changes<00:23:26.960> will<00:23:27.120> go 00:23:27.270 --> 00:23:27.280 align:start position:0% so any of these policy changes will go 00:23:27.280 --> 00:23:29.350 align:start position:0% so any of these policy changes will go into<00:23:27.520> effect<00:23:28.000> with<00:23:28.159> the<00:23:28.320> next<00:23:28.720> cycle<00:23:29.200> that 00:23:29.350 --> 00:23:29.360 align:start position:0% into effect with the next cycle that 00:23:29.360 --> 00:23:30.710 align:start position:0% into effect with the next cycle that will<00:23:29.520> be 00:23:30.710 --> 00:23:30.720 align:start position:0% will be 00:23:30.720 --> 00:23:32.070 align:start position:0% will be june 00:23:32.070 --> 00:23:32.080 align:start position:0% june 00:23:32.080 --> 00:23:34.630 align:start position:0% june may<00:23:32.240> or<00:23:32.400> june<00:23:32.720> time<00:23:33.039> frame 00:23:34.630 --> 00:23:34.640 align:start position:0% may or june time frame 00:23:34.640 --> 00:23:35.990 align:start position:0% may or june time frame again<00:23:34.960> most<00:23:35.200> of<00:23:35.280> these<00:23:35.440> things<00:23:35.679> are<00:23:35.760> just 00:23:35.990 --> 00:23:36.000 align:start position:0% again most of these things are just 00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:37.909 align:start position:0% again most of these things are just guidelines<00:23:36.640> and<00:23:36.960> a<00:23:37.120> lot<00:23:37.280> of<00:23:37.360> them<00:23:37.520> are<00:23:37.679> things 00:23:37.909 --> 00:23:37.919 align:start position:0% guidelines and a lot of them are things 00:23:37.919 --> 00:23:39.350 align:start position:0% guidelines and a lot of them are things that<00:23:38.080> we've<00:23:38.400> already<00:23:38.720> asked<00:23:38.960> you<00:23:39.120> to<00:23:39.200> be 00:23:39.350 --> 00:23:39.360 align:start position:0% that we've already asked you to be 00:23:39.360 --> 00:23:41.669 align:start position:0% that we've already asked you to be considering<00:23:39.919> with<00:23:40.080> projects<00:23:40.559> in<00:23:40.640> the<00:23:40.720> past<00:23:41.520> so 00:23:41.669 --> 00:23:41.679 align:start position:0% considering with projects in the past so 00:23:41.679 --> 00:23:43.350 align:start position:0% considering with projects in the past so there's<00:23:41.840> no<00:23:42.080> reason<00:23:42.320> you<00:23:42.559> can't<00:23:42.960> think<00:23:43.200> of 00:23:43.350 --> 00:23:43.360 align:start position:0% there's no reason you can't think of 00:23:43.360 --> 00:23:45.669 align:start position:0% there's no reason you can't think of these<00:23:44.080> items 00:23:45.669 --> 00:23:45.679 align:start position:0% these items 00:23:45.679 --> 00:23:48.149 align:start position:0% these items as<00:23:45.919> you<00:23:46.159> weigh<00:23:46.480> projects<00:23:47.440> they<00:23:47.600> just<00:23:47.760> won't<00:23:48.000> be 00:23:48.149 --> 00:23:48.159 align:start position:0% as you weigh projects they just won't be 00:23:48.159 --> 00:23:51.190 align:start position:0% as you weigh projects they just won't be officially<00:23:48.640> part<00:23:48.880> of<00:23:48.960> the<00:23:50.000> policies<00:23:50.799> until 00:23:51.190 --> 00:23:51.200 align:start position:0% officially part of the policies until 00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:53.110 align:start position:0% officially part of the policies until after<00:23:51.440> city<00:23:51.679> council<00:23:52.080> approves 00:23:53.110 --> 00:23:53.120 align:start position:0% after city council approves 00:23:53.120 --> 00:23:55.029 align:start position:0% after city council approves with<00:23:53.360> that<00:23:53.520> we<00:23:53.679> do<00:23:53.840> have<00:23:54.000> that<00:23:54.240> meeting<00:23:54.640> in<00:23:54.880> two 00:23:55.029 --> 00:23:55.039 align:start position:0% with that we do have that meeting in two 00:23:55.039 --> 00:23:57.430 align:start position:0% with that we do have that meeting in two weeks<00:23:55.360> i<00:23:55.440> think<00:23:55.679> our<00:23:55.840> regular<00:23:56.320> meeting 00:23:57.430 --> 00:23:57.440 align:start position:0% weeks i think our regular meeting 00:23:57.440 --> 00:23:59.590 align:start position:0% weeks i think our regular meeting i<00:23:57.600> think<00:23:57.840> the<00:23:58.080> primary<00:23:58.640> item<00:23:58.880> on<00:23:58.960> that<00:23:59.200> agenda 00:23:59.590 --> 00:23:59.600 align:start position:0% i think the primary item on that agenda 00:23:59.600 --> 00:24:02.070 align:start position:0% i think the primary item on that agenda will<00:23:59.760> be<00:24:00.080> consideration<00:24:00.880> of<00:24:01.600> the<00:24:01.760> grant 00:24:02.070 --> 00:24:02.080 align:start position:0% will be consideration of the grant 00:24:02.080 --> 00:24:04.070 align:start position:0% will be consideration of the grant requests<00:24:02.559> that<00:24:02.720> have<00:24:02.880> come<00:24:03.120> in<00:24:03.760> we'll<00:24:03.919> be 00:24:04.070 --> 00:24:04.080 align:start position:0% requests that have come in we'll be 00:24:04.080 --> 00:24:06.470 align:start position:0% requests that have come in we'll be getting<00:24:04.320> to<00:24:04.480> you<00:24:04.640> those<00:24:04.880> to<00:24:05.039> you<00:24:05.760> shortly<00:24:06.240> if<00:24:06.400> i 00:24:06.470 --> 00:24:06.480 align:start position:0% getting to you those to you shortly if i 00:24:06.480 --> 00:24:07.990 align:start position:0% getting to you those to you shortly if i don't<00:24:06.640> think<00:24:06.799> we've<00:24:06.960> provided<00:24:07.360> them<00:24:07.520> yet<00:24:07.919> is 00:24:07.990 --> 00:24:08.000 align:start position:0% don't think we've provided them yet is 00:24:08.000 --> 00:24:09.350 align:start position:0% don't think we've provided them yet is that<00:24:08.240> correct 00:24:09.350 --> 00:24:09.360 align:start position:0% that correct 00:24:09.360 --> 00:24:10.710 align:start position:0% that correct but<00:24:09.520> we'll<00:24:09.679> be<00:24:09.840> getting<00:24:10.080> you<00:24:10.320> all<00:24:10.400> of<00:24:10.559> those 00:24:10.710 --> 00:24:10.720 align:start position:0% but we'll be getting you all of those 00:24:10.720 --> 00:24:12.230 align:start position:0% but we'll be getting you all of those projects 00:24:12.230 --> 00:24:12.240 align:start position:0% projects 00:24:12.240 --> 00:24:15.110 align:start position:0% projects probably<00:24:12.799> this<00:24:12.960> week<00:24:13.600> that's<00:24:13.760> right 00:24:15.110 --> 00:24:15.120 align:start position:0% probably this week that's right 00:24:15.120 --> 00:24:15.909 align:start position:0% probably this week that's right so 00:24:15.909 --> 00:24:15.919 align:start position:0% so 00:24:15.919 --> 00:24:17.269 align:start position:0% so that's<00:24:16.159> all<00:24:16.320> i<00:24:16.400> have 00:24:17.269 --> 00:24:17.279 align:start position:0% that's all i have 00:24:17.279 --> 00:24:20.950 align:start position:0% that's all i have mr<00:24:17.520> chairman<00:24:18.000> i<00:24:18.159> have<00:24:18.320> a<00:24:18.640> question 00:24:20.950 --> 00:24:20.960 align:start position:0% mr chairman i have a question 00:24:20.960 --> 00:24:24.549 align:start position:0% mr chairman i have a question go<00:24:21.120> ahead<00:24:21.360> i'd<00:24:21.600> like<00:24:21.840> to<00:24:22.000> have<00:24:22.240> on<00:24:22.400> the<00:24:22.559> agenda 00:24:24.549 --> 00:24:24.559 align:start position:0% go ahead i'd like to have on the agenda 00:24:24.559 --> 00:24:26.950 align:start position:0% go ahead i'd like to have on the agenda a<00:24:24.880> report<00:24:25.360> from<00:24:25.520> the<00:24:25.679> staff 00:24:26.950 --> 00:24:26.960 align:start position:0% a report from the staff 00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:29.430 align:start position:0% a report from the staff and<00:24:27.200> its<00:24:27.520> recommendation<00:24:28.640> for<00:24:28.880> how<00:24:29.120> in<00:24:29.279> the 00:24:29.430 --> 00:24:29.440 align:start position:0% and its recommendation for how in the 00:24:29.440 --> 00:24:31.510 align:start position:0% and its recommendation for how in the sam<00:24:29.679> hill<00:24:29.919> we're<00:24:30.080> going<00:24:30.240> to<00:24:30.400> improve 00:24:31.510 --> 00:24:31.520 align:start position:0% sam hill we're going to improve 00:24:31.520 --> 00:24:33.669 align:start position:0% sam hill we're going to improve and<00:24:32.159> expand<00:24:32.799> and 00:24:33.669 --> 00:24:33.679 align:start position:0% and expand and 00:24:33.679 --> 00:24:36.230 align:start position:0% and expand and make<00:24:34.000> fourth<00:24:34.320> street<00:24:34.640> a<00:24:34.799> viable<00:24:35.279> street 00:24:36.230 --> 00:24:36.240 align:start position:0% make fourth street a viable street 00:24:36.240 --> 00:24:37.909 align:start position:0% make fourth street a viable street we<00:24:36.400> spend<00:24:36.720> a<00:24:36.880> hell<00:24:37.120> of<00:24:37.200> a<00:24:37.200> lot<00:24:37.360> of<00:24:37.440> money<00:24:37.760> up 00:24:37.909 --> 00:24:37.919 align:start position:0% we spend a hell of a lot of money up 00:24:37.919 --> 00:24:39.830 align:start position:0% we spend a hell of a lot of money up there<00:24:38.480> and<00:24:38.640> we're<00:24:38.880> not<00:24:39.120> we've<00:24:39.279> got<00:24:39.440> a<00:24:39.520> street 00:24:39.830 --> 00:24:39.840 align:start position:0% there and we're not we've got a street 00:24:39.840 --> 00:24:41.510 align:start position:0% there and we're not we've got a street that's<00:24:40.000> not<00:24:40.240> worth 00:24:41.510 --> 00:24:41.520 align:start position:0% that's not worth 00:24:41.520 --> 00:24:42.950 align:start position:0% that's not worth to<00:24:41.679> blow<00:24:41.919> it 00:24:42.950 --> 00:24:42.960 align:start position:0% to blow it 00:24:42.960 --> 00:24:45.029 align:start position:0% to blow it well<00:24:43.279> you<00:24:43.440> know<00:24:43.600> where<00:24:44.080> tell<00:24:44.320> you<00:24:44.480> i<00:24:44.799> i 00:24:45.029 --> 00:24:45.039 align:start position:0% well you know where tell you i i 00:24:45.039 --> 00:24:48.310 align:start position:0% well you know where tell you i i actually<00:24:45.919> had<00:24:46.159> an<00:24:46.559> email<00:24:46.880> about<00:24:47.120> that<00:24:47.360> today 00:24:48.310 --> 00:24:48.320 align:start position:0% actually had an email about that today 00:24:48.320 --> 00:24:49.830 align:start position:0% actually had an email about that today um 00:24:49.830 --> 00:24:49.840 align:start position:0% um 00:24:49.840 --> 00:24:51.110 align:start position:0% um there<00:24:50.080> is<00:24:50.400> a 00:24:51.110 --> 00:24:51.120 align:start position:0% there is a 00:24:51.120 --> 00:24:53.269 align:start position:0% there is a as<00:24:51.360> you<00:24:51.440> know<00:24:51.600> we've<00:24:51.840> talked<00:24:52.080> about<00:24:52.400> this<00:24:52.640> that 00:24:53.269 --> 00:24:53.279 align:start position:0% as you know we've talked about this that 00:24:53.279 --> 00:24:55.510 align:start position:0% as you know we've talked about this that a<00:24:53.520> portion<00:24:53.919> of<00:24:54.000> 4th<00:24:54.400> street<00:24:54.799> is<00:24:54.960> privately 00:24:55.510 --> 00:24:55.520 align:start position:0% a portion of 4th street is privately 00:24:55.520 --> 00:24:56.630 align:start position:0% a portion of 4th street is privately owned 00:24:56.630 --> 00:24:56.640 align:start position:0% owned 00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:59.190 align:start position:0% owned about<00:24:56.880> half<00:24:57.120> of<00:24:57.279> that<00:24:57.679> block<00:24:58.320> is 00:24:59.190 --> 00:24:59.200 align:start position:0% about half of that block is 00:24:59.200 --> 00:25:01.029 align:start position:0% about half of that block is is<00:24:59.360> a<00:24:59.440> city<00:24:59.760> street<00:25:00.080> but<00:25:00.240> then<00:25:00.400> the<00:25:00.559> other<00:25:00.720> half 00:25:01.029 --> 00:25:01.039 align:start position:0% is a city street but then the other half 00:25:01.039 --> 00:25:03.590 align:start position:0% is a city street but then the other half is<00:25:01.200> privately<00:25:01.760> owned<00:25:02.480> there's<00:25:02.799> currently<00:25:03.440> a 00:25:03.590 --> 00:25:03.600 align:start position:0% is privately owned there's currently a 00:25:03.600 --> 00:25:05.909 align:start position:0% is privately owned there's currently a dispute<00:25:04.400> between<00:25:04.960> a 00:25:05.909 --> 00:25:05.919 align:start position:0% dispute between a 00:25:05.919 --> 00:25:07.990 align:start position:0% dispute between a local<00:25:06.240> property<00:25:06.640> owner<00:25:07.200> who<00:25:07.440> believes<00:25:07.760> he 00:25:07.990 --> 00:25:08.000 align:start position:0% local property owner who believes he 00:25:08.000 --> 00:25:09.110 align:start position:0% local property owner who believes he owns<00:25:08.240> it 00:25:09.110 --> 00:25:09.120 align:start position:0% owns it 00:25:09.120 --> 00:25:11.510 align:start position:0% owns it and<00:25:09.279> txdot<00:25:09.840> who<00:25:10.000> believe<00:25:10.320> they<00:25:10.559> own<00:25:10.799> it 00:25:11.510 --> 00:25:11.520 align:start position:0% and txdot who believe they own it 00:25:11.520 --> 00:25:14.149 align:start position:0% and txdot who believe they own it they're<00:25:12.240> doing<00:25:12.640> surveying<00:25:13.360> and<00:25:13.600> title 00:25:14.149 --> 00:25:14.159 align:start position:0% they're doing surveying and title 00:25:14.159 --> 00:25:15.909 align:start position:0% they're doing surveying and title research<00:25:14.720> and<00:25:14.880> all<00:25:15.039> that<00:25:15.200> kind<00:25:15.360> of<00:25:15.520> stuff<00:25:15.760> to 00:25:15.909 --> 00:25:15.919 align:start position:0% research and all that kind of stuff to 00:25:15.919 --> 00:25:18.789 align:start position:0% research and all that kind of stuff to determine<00:25:16.799> who<00:25:17.039> actually<00:25:17.360> owns<00:25:17.679> it 00:25:18.789 --> 00:25:18.799 align:start position:0% determine who actually owns it 00:25:18.799 --> 00:25:21.590 align:start position:0% determine who actually owns it our<00:25:19.039> city<00:25:19.679> public<00:25:20.000> works<00:25:20.400> operations 00:25:21.590 --> 00:25:21.600 align:start position:0% our city public works operations 00:25:21.600 --> 00:25:24.070 align:start position:0% our city public works operations has<00:25:22.080> preliminarily<00:25:22.960> looked<00:25:23.279> into<00:25:23.679> what<00:25:23.919> they 00:25:24.070 --> 00:25:24.080 align:start position:0% has preliminarily looked into what they 00:25:24.080 --> 00:25:26.870 align:start position:0% has preliminarily looked into what they would<00:25:24.320> do<00:25:24.480> to<00:25:24.559> that<00:25:24.799> street<00:25:25.279> as<00:25:25.520> a<00:25:25.600> project 00:25:26.870 --> 00:25:26.880 align:start position:0% would do to that street as a project 00:25:26.880 --> 00:25:28.870 align:start position:0% would do to that street as a project if<00:25:27.039> we<00:25:27.120> can<00:25:27.279> move<00:25:27.520> forward 00:25:28.870 --> 00:25:28.880 align:start position:0% if we can move forward 00:25:28.880 --> 00:25:31.269 align:start position:0% if we can move forward but<00:25:29.039> we're<00:25:29.279> basically<00:25:29.919> waiting<00:25:30.480> on 00:25:31.269 --> 00:25:31.279 align:start position:0% but we're basically waiting on 00:25:31.279 --> 00:25:33.110 align:start position:0% but we're basically waiting on uh<00:25:31.520> txdot<00:25:32.080> and<00:25:32.159> that<00:25:32.320> property<00:25:32.720> owner<00:25:32.960> to 00:25:33.110 --> 00:25:33.120 align:start position:0% uh txdot and that property owner to 00:25:33.120 --> 00:25:35.669 align:start position:0% uh txdot and that property owner to resolve<00:25:33.520> that<00:25:33.760> ownership<00:25:34.240> dispute<00:25:35.200> and<00:25:35.440> then 00:25:35.669 --> 00:25:35.679 align:start position:0% resolve that ownership dispute and then 00:25:35.679 --> 00:25:37.029 align:start position:0% resolve that ownership dispute and then we<00:25:35.840> will<00:25:36.080> approach 00:25:37.029 --> 00:25:37.039 align:start position:0% we will approach 00:25:37.039 --> 00:25:39.269 align:start position:0% we will approach whoever<00:25:37.600> actually<00:25:37.919> owns<00:25:38.240> it 00:25:39.269 --> 00:25:39.279 align:start position:0% whoever actually owns it 00:25:39.279 --> 00:25:40.870 align:start position:0% whoever actually owns it about<00:25:39.600> the<00:25:39.760> possibility<00:25:40.320> of<00:25:40.400> the<00:25:40.559> city 00:25:40.870 --> 00:25:40.880 align:start position:0% about the possibility of the city 00:25:40.880 --> 00:25:43.430 align:start position:0% about the possibility of the city acquiring<00:25:41.520> that<00:25:42.000> section<00:25:42.400> of<00:25:42.480> fourth<00:25:42.799> street 00:25:43.430 --> 00:25:43.440 align:start position:0% acquiring that section of fourth street 00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:45.269 align:start position:0% acquiring that section of fourth street so<00:25:43.679> that<00:25:43.840> we<00:25:44.000> could<00:25:44.159> then<00:25:44.480> do<00:25:44.720> a<00:25:44.960> street 00:25:45.269 --> 00:25:45.279 align:start position:0% so that we could then do a street 00:25:45.279 --> 00:25:46.950 align:start position:0% so that we could then do a street project<00:25:45.679> for<00:25:45.760> the<00:25:45.840> whole<00:25:46.320> city<00:25:46.640> staff 00:25:46.950 --> 00:25:46.960 align:start position:0% project for the whole city staff 00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:49.430 align:start position:0% project for the whole city staff considered<00:25:47.760> condemnation<00:25:48.960> that'll<00:25:49.200> clear 00:25:49.430 --> 00:25:49.440 align:start position:0% considered condemnation that'll clear 00:25:49.440 --> 00:25:51.590 align:start position:0% considered condemnation that'll clear the<00:25:49.600> title<00:25:49.919> real<00:25:50.159> quick 00:25:51.590 --> 00:25:51.600 align:start position:0% the title real quick 00:25:51.600 --> 00:25:53.830 align:start position:0% the title real quick we<00:25:51.760> have<00:25:52.000> not<00:25:52.400> at<00:25:52.559> this<00:25:52.799> point<00:25:53.120> i<00:25:53.200> think<00:25:53.440> spoken 00:25:53.830 --> 00:25:53.840 align:start position:0% we have not at this point i think spoken 00:25:53.840 --> 00:25:58.070 align:start position:0% we have not at this point i think spoken like<00:25:54.080> a<00:25:54.159> man<00:25:54.480> who's<00:25:54.720> not<00:25:54.880> elected 00:25:58.070 --> 00:25:58.080 align:start position:0% 00:25:58.080 --> 00:26:00.630 align:start position:0% i<00:25:58.559> can<00:25:58.799> raise<00:25:59.120> that<00:25:59.440> with<00:26:00.000> with<00:26:00.240> our<00:26:00.400> real 00:26:00.630 --> 00:26:00.640 align:start position:0% i can raise that with with our real 00:26:00.640 --> 00:26:02.950 align:start position:0% i can raise that with with our real estate<00:26:00.960> staff 00:26:02.950 --> 00:26:02.960 align:start position:0% estate staff 00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:04.950 align:start position:0% estate staff and<00:26:03.520> that<00:26:03.679> would<00:26:03.919> probably<00:26:04.400> be<00:26:04.559> one<00:26:04.720> of<00:26:04.799> those 00:26:04.950 --> 00:26:04.960 align:start position:0% and that would probably be one of those 00:26:04.960 --> 00:26:07.110 align:start position:0% and that would probably be one of those things<00:26:05.279> that<00:26:05.600> city<00:26:05.840> council<00:26:06.320> would 00:26:07.110 --> 00:26:07.120 align:start position:0% things that city council would 00:26:07.120 --> 00:26:09.750 align:start position:0% things that city council would would<00:26:07.360> want<00:26:07.520> to<00:26:07.679> take<00:26:08.000> up<00:26:08.240> and<00:26:08.400> discuss 00:26:09.750 --> 00:26:09.760 align:start position:0% would want to take up and discuss 00:26:09.760 --> 00:26:11.430 align:start position:0% would want to take up and discuss whether<00:26:10.080> or<00:26:10.159> not<00:26:10.400> they<00:26:10.559> wanted<00:26:10.799> to<00:26:10.960> proceed 00:26:11.430 --> 00:26:11.440 align:start position:0% whether or not they wanted to proceed 00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:15.029 align:start position:0% whether or not they wanted to proceed with<00:26:11.679> that<00:26:12.159> with<00:26:12.320> that<00:26:12.559> route 00:26:15.029 --> 00:26:15.039 align:start position:0% 00:26:15.039 --> 00:26:17.269 align:start position:0% who's<00:26:15.520> who's<00:26:15.840> the<00:26:16.000> private<00:26:16.640> property<00:26:17.039> owner 00:26:17.269 --> 00:26:17.279 align:start position:0% who's who's the private property owner 00:26:17.279 --> 00:26:18.950 align:start position:0% who's who's the private property owner in<00:26:17.440> question 00:26:18.950 --> 00:26:18.960 align:start position:0% in question 00:26:18.960 --> 00:26:19.830 align:start position:0% in question um 00:26:19.830 --> 00:26:19.840 align:start position:0% um 00:26:19.840 --> 00:26:22.149 align:start position:0% um i<00:26:20.000> think<00:26:20.240> we<00:26:20.400> can<00:26:20.640> say<00:26:20.880> that<00:26:21.120> it's<00:26:21.360> it's<00:26:22.000> lee 00:26:22.149 --> 00:26:22.159 align:start position:0% i think we can say that it's it's lee 00:26:22.159 --> 00:26:25.510 align:start position:0% i think we can say that it's it's lee fluger<00:26:22.640> that's<00:26:22.880> why<00:26:23.039> i<00:26:23.120> thought 00:26:25.510 --> 00:26:25.520 align:start position:0% fluger that's why i thought 00:26:25.520 --> 00:26:27.909 align:start position:0% fluger that's why i thought and<00:26:25.679> i<00:26:25.840> can<00:26:25.919> talk<00:26:26.159> to<00:26:26.320> me<00:26:26.559> but<00:26:26.799> uh 00:26:27.909 --> 00:26:27.919 align:start position:0% and i can talk to me but uh 00:26:27.919 --> 00:26:30.630 align:start position:0% and i can talk to me but uh okay<00:26:28.480> i'd<00:26:28.640> like<00:26:28.880> for<00:26:29.039> you<00:26:29.360> to<00:26:29.600> have<00:26:29.840> a 00:26:30.630 --> 00:26:30.640 align:start position:0% okay i'd like for you to have a 00:26:30.640 --> 00:26:32.710 align:start position:0% okay i'd like for you to have a at<00:26:30.880> least<00:26:31.200> an<00:26:31.440> update<00:26:31.760> discussion<00:26:32.320> on<00:26:32.480> that 00:26:32.710 --> 00:26:32.720 align:start position:0% at least an update discussion on that 00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:33.990 align:start position:0% at least an update discussion on that next<00:26:32.960> agenda 00:26:33.990 --> 00:26:34.000 align:start position:0% next agenda 00:26:34.000 --> 00:26:35.430 align:start position:0% next agenda yeah<00:26:34.400> you<00:26:34.559> can 00:26:35.430 --> 00:26:35.440 align:start position:0% yeah you can 00:26:35.440 --> 00:26:37.590 align:start position:0% yeah you can we<00:26:35.600> can<00:26:36.240> from<00:26:36.480> a<00:26:36.559> legal<00:26:36.880> point<00:26:37.120> of<00:26:37.200> view<00:26:37.520> and 00:26:37.590 --> 00:26:37.600 align:start position:0% we can from a legal point of view and 00:26:37.600 --> 00:26:39.750 align:start position:0% we can from a legal point of view and from<00:26:37.840> the<00:26:37.919> staff<00:26:38.240> point<00:26:38.480> of<00:26:38.559> view<00:26:39.200> the<00:26:39.360> costs 00:26:39.750 --> 00:26:39.760 align:start position:0% from the staff point of view the costs 00:26:39.760 --> 00:26:41.909 align:start position:0% from the staff point of view the costs involved<00:26:40.159> and<00:26:40.320> what<00:26:40.799> what<00:26:41.039> might<00:26:41.279> be<00:26:41.440> proposed 00:26:41.909 --> 00:26:41.919 align:start position:0% involved and what what might be proposed 00:26:41.919 --> 00:26:44.950 align:start position:0% involved and what what might be proposed for<00:26:42.480> and<00:26:42.720> how<00:26:43.360> uh<00:26:44.000> what<00:26:44.159> type<00:26:44.400> of<00:26:44.480> construction 00:26:44.950 --> 00:26:44.960 align:start position:0% for and how uh what type of construction 00:26:44.960 --> 00:26:50.310 align:start position:0% for and how uh what type of construction you're<00:26:45.200> talking<00:26:45.440> about 00:26:50.310 --> 00:26:50.320 align:start position:0% 00:26:50.320 --> 00:26:52.630 align:start position:0% because<00:26:50.640> i<00:26:50.720> think<00:26:51.360> we<00:26:51.360> we<00:26:51.760> spent<00:26:52.080> a<00:26:52.240> hell<00:26:52.559> of<00:26:52.559> a 00:26:52.630 --> 00:26:52.640 align:start position:0% because i think we we spent a hell of a 00:26:52.640 --> 00:26:55.430 align:start position:0% because i think we we spent a hell of a lot<00:26:52.799> of<00:26:52.880> money<00:26:53.200> up<00:26:53.360> there<00:26:53.679> guys 00:26:55.430 --> 00:26:55.440 align:start position:0% lot of money up there guys 00:26:55.440 --> 00:26:58.149 align:start position:0% lot of money up there guys well<00:26:55.679> i<00:26:55.919> i<00:26:56.320> understand<00:26:56.720> steve<00:26:57.200> i<00:26:57.279> guess<00:26:57.520> my<00:26:57.919> my 00:26:58.149 --> 00:26:58.159 align:start position:0% well i i understand steve i guess my my 00:26:58.159 --> 00:26:59.510 align:start position:0% well i i understand steve i guess my my question 00:26:59.510 --> 00:26:59.520 align:start position:0% question 00:26:59.520 --> 00:27:01.269 align:start position:0% question in<00:26:59.679> that<00:26:59.840> regard<00:27:00.240> will<00:27:00.400> be 00:27:01.269 --> 00:27:01.279 align:start position:0% in that regard will be 00:27:01.279 --> 00:27:03.350 align:start position:0% in that regard will be um<00:27:01.840> i<00:27:02.000> mean<00:27:02.080> i'm<00:27:02.320> happy<00:27:02.559> to<00:27:02.720> place<00:27:02.960> it<00:27:03.120> on<00:27:03.200> the 00:27:03.350 --> 00:27:03.360 align:start position:0% um i mean i'm happy to place it on the 00:27:03.360 --> 00:27:05.190 align:start position:0% um i mean i'm happy to place it on the agenda<00:27:03.760> for<00:27:03.919> a<00:27:04.000> future<00:27:04.320> item<00:27:04.640> but<00:27:04.880> i'm<00:27:04.960> not 00:27:05.190 --> 00:27:05.200 align:start position:0% agenda for a future item but i'm not 00:27:05.200 --> 00:27:07.350 align:start position:0% agenda for a future item but i'm not sure<00:27:05.440> what<00:27:05.600> this<00:27:05.919> board<00:27:06.400> what<00:27:06.720> this<00:27:06.960> board 00:27:07.350 --> 00:27:07.360 align:start position:0% sure what this board what this board 00:27:07.360 --> 00:27:09.350 align:start position:0% sure what this board what this board does<00:27:08.080> in<00:27:08.159> relation<00:27:08.480> the<00:27:08.559> board<00:27:08.799> can<00:27:08.960> make<00:27:09.200> a 00:27:09.350 --> 00:27:09.360 align:start position:0% does in relation the board can make a 00:27:09.360 --> 00:27:11.909 align:start position:0% does in relation the board can make a recommendation<00:27:10.080> to<00:27:10.240> the<00:27:10.559> city<00:27:10.880> council<00:27:11.520> to 00:27:11.909 --> 00:27:11.919 align:start position:0% recommendation to the city council to 00:27:11.919 --> 00:27:13.909 align:start position:0% recommendation to the city council to proceed<00:27:12.320> or<00:27:12.400> don't<00:27:12.640> proceed<00:27:13.279> based<00:27:13.600> on 00:27:13.909 --> 00:27:13.919 align:start position:0% proceed or don't proceed based on 00:27:13.919 --> 00:27:15.669 align:start position:0% proceed or don't proceed based on certain<00:27:14.240> criteria<00:27:14.720> that<00:27:14.880> the<00:27:14.960> staff<00:27:15.279> comes<00:27:15.520> up 00:27:15.669 --> 00:27:15.679 align:start position:0% certain criteria that the staff comes up 00:27:15.679 --> 00:27:17.990 align:start position:0% certain criteria that the staff comes up with<00:27:16.400> but<00:27:16.559> yeah<00:27:16.799> i<00:27:16.960> think<00:27:17.120> the<00:27:17.360> intent<00:27:17.679> that<00:27:17.840> we 00:27:17.990 --> 00:27:18.000 align:start position:0% with but yeah i think the intent that we 00:27:18.000 --> 00:27:20.789 align:start position:0% with but yeah i think the intent that we have<00:27:18.080> discussed<00:27:18.640> in<00:27:18.720> the<00:27:18.880> past<00:27:19.279> was<00:27:20.080> uh<00:27:20.480> given 00:27:20.789 --> 00:27:20.799 align:start position:0% have discussed in the past was uh given 00:27:20.799 --> 00:27:21.750 align:start position:0% have discussed in the past was uh given the 00:27:21.750 --> 00:27:21.760 align:start position:0% the 00:27:21.760 --> 00:27:23.510 align:start position:0% the amount<00:27:22.080> of<00:27:22.240> money<00:27:22.480> that<00:27:22.640> we've<00:27:22.880> got<00:27:23.200> in<00:27:23.360> the 00:27:23.510 --> 00:27:23.520 align:start position:0% amount of money that we've got in the 00:27:23.520 --> 00:27:25.510 align:start position:0% amount of money that we've got in the north<00:27:24.000> tiers 00:27:25.510 --> 00:27:25.520 align:start position:0% north tiers 00:27:25.520 --> 00:27:28.149 align:start position:0% north tiers that<00:27:26.080> we<00:27:26.240> could<00:27:26.480> fund<00:27:26.799> a<00:27:26.880> project<00:27:27.440> of<00:27:27.840> fourth 00:27:28.149 --> 00:27:28.159 align:start position:0% that we could fund a project of fourth 00:27:28.159 --> 00:27:30.149 align:start position:0% that we could fund a project of fourth street 00:27:30.149 --> 00:27:30.159 align:start position:0% street 00:27:30.159 --> 00:27:31.990 align:start position:0% street we've<00:27:30.320> got<00:27:30.559> tears<00:27:30.880> money<00:27:31.360> there's<00:27:31.600> community 00:27:31.990 --> 00:27:32.000 align:start position:0% we've got tears money there's community 00:27:32.000 --> 00:27:33.590 align:start position:0% we've got tears money there's community development<00:27:32.480> funds<00:27:32.880> there's<00:27:33.120> other<00:27:33.279> kind<00:27:33.520> of 00:27:33.590 --> 00:27:33.600 align:start position:0% development funds there's other kind of 00:27:33.600 --> 00:27:35.590 align:start position:0% development funds there's other kind of funds<00:27:33.919> the<00:27:34.000> city<00:27:34.240> has<00:27:34.480> available<00:27:34.880> from<00:27:35.279> i<00:27:35.440> mean 00:27:35.590 --> 00:27:35.600 align:start position:0% funds the city has available from i mean 00:27:35.600 --> 00:27:37.190 align:start position:0% funds the city has available from i mean that's<00:27:36.240> definitely<00:27:36.640> a<00:27:36.799> community 00:27:37.190 --> 00:27:37.200 align:start position:0% that's definitely a community 00:27:37.200 --> 00:27:40.149 align:start position:0% that's definitely a community development<00:27:38.080> united<00:27:38.640> area 00:27:40.149 --> 00:27:40.159 align:start position:0% development united area 00:27:40.159 --> 00:27:43.269 align:start position:0% development united area it's<00:27:40.399> fourth<00:27:40.720> street<00:27:41.039> uh<00:27:41.279> north<00:27:41.679> or<00:27:41.840> south 00:27:43.269 --> 00:27:43.279 align:start position:0% it's fourth street uh north or south 00:27:43.279 --> 00:27:45.909 align:start position:0% it's fourth street uh north or south it<00:27:43.520> is<00:27:43.840> in<00:27:44.000> the<00:27:44.240> north<00:27:44.720> tiers<00:27:45.200> area<00:27:45.760> the 00:27:45.909 --> 00:27:45.919 align:start position:0% it is in the north tiers area the 00:27:45.919 --> 00:27:47.350 align:start position:0% it is in the north tiers area the boundary 00:27:47.350 --> 00:27:47.360 align:start position:0% boundary 00:27:47.360 --> 00:27:49.350 align:start position:0% boundary it<00:27:47.520> sort<00:27:47.760> of<00:27:47.919> jogs<00:27:48.240> around<00:27:48.559> but<00:27:48.720> it's<00:27:48.960> roughly 00:27:49.350 --> 00:27:49.360 align:start position:0% it sort of jogs around but it's roughly 00:27:49.360 --> 00:27:52.950 align:start position:0% it sort of jogs around but it's roughly third<00:27:49.600> street<00:27:50.080> in<00:27:50.320> the<00:27:50.399> boundary 00:27:52.950 --> 00:27:52.960 align:start position:0% 00:27:52.960 --> 00:27:55.590 align:start position:0% are<00:27:53.039> there<00:27:53.200> any<00:27:53.440> other<00:27:53.840> items<00:27:54.640> for<00:27:55.200> the<00:27:55.279> next 00:27:55.590 --> 00:27:55.600 align:start position:0% are there any other items for the next 00:27:55.600 --> 00:27:56.630 align:start position:0% are there any other items for the next meeting 00:27:56.630 --> 00:27:56.640 align:start position:0% meeting 00:27:56.640 --> 00:27:58.070 align:start position:0% meeting any<00:27:56.880> one<00:27:57.039> of<00:27:57.120> the<00:27:57.200> members<00:27:57.520> would<00:27:57.679> like<00:27:57.840> on<00:27:58.000> the 00:27:58.070 --> 00:27:58.080 align:start position:0% any one of the members would like on the 00:27:58.080 --> 00:28:04.870 align:start position:0% any one of the members would like on the agenda 00:28:04.870 --> 00:28:04.880 align:start position:0% 00:28:04.880 --> 00:28:05.909 align:start position:0% if 00:28:05.909 --> 00:28:05.919 align:start position:0% if 00:28:05.919 --> 00:28:07.430 align:start position:0% if nothing<00:28:06.240> else<00:28:06.480> our<00:28:06.640> next<00:28:06.880> meeting<00:28:07.120> is<00:28:07.200> on<00:28:07.360> the 00:28:07.430 --> 00:28:07.440 align:start position:0% nothing else our next meeting is on the 00:28:07.440 --> 00:28:09.510 align:start position:0% nothing else our next meeting is on the 25th<00:28:08.320> and<00:28:08.640> i'll 00:28:09.510 --> 00:28:09.520 align:start position:0% 25th and i'll 00:28:09.520 --> 00:28:12.630 align:start position:0% 25th and i'll entertain<00:28:09.840> a<00:28:10.000> motion<00:28:10.240> to<00:28:10.399> adjourn<00:28:11.279> so 00:28:12.630 --> 00:28:12.640 align:start position:0% entertain a motion to adjourn so 00:28:12.640 --> 00:28:14.710 align:start position:0% entertain a motion to adjourn so that's<00:28:12.960> made<00:28:13.279> by<00:28:13.440> stevens<00:28:13.919> seconded<00:28:14.320> by<00:28:14.480> mr 00:28:14.710 --> 00:28:14.720 align:start position:0% that's made by stevens seconded by mr 00:28:14.720 --> 00:28:16.230 align:start position:0% that's made by stevens seconded by mr fernandez 00:28:16.230 --> 00:28:16.240 align:start position:0% fernandez 00:28:16.240 --> 00:28:20.840 align:start position:0% fernandez everybody<00:28:16.799> can<00:28:17.039> vote<00:28:17.279> by<00:28:17.440> leaving<00:28:17.760> the<00:28:17.840> room