uk debating in parliament whether to ban donald trump from entering the uk following his comments about the muslim community. >> hate crimes are inflamed by the word donald trump is using. >> i heard of a number of cases. i never heard one for stupidity. >> it's good to be curious to see how they end up shuffling that opinion following this unexpected result to come out. hello and welcome. donald trump has won the presidency of the united states. what has this told us about the political process in the united states, what are the change shows and policy initiatives the president will put forward and how does china view the new international landscape to come? happy to be joined in the studio by the professors. a distinguishethe distinguishedm the harvard business school, professor of international relations at the american university in washington, d.c.. but before we begin our discussion, this will be very tough. let's take a look at this. >> donald trump has won the presidency. it seemed as unlikely or impossible. speaking in new york he expressed gratitude towards hillary clinton and

donald trump from entering the uk. here are the comments about the muslim community. >> hate crimes by the words donald trump's using. >> a ridiculous xenophobia. >> i would be curious to see how they end up reshuffling their opinion following this very shocking and unexpected result coming out of the u.s. election. we are asking students to participate in this year studentcam tree competition by telling us what is the most urgent issue for our next president, donald trump and the incoming congress to address in 2017? our competition is open to all middle school and high school students grades six through 12. students can work alone or in a group of up to three to produce a five to seven minute documentary on the issue selected to the grand prize of $5000 will go to the student or teamed with the best overall entry page $100,000 in cash prizes will be awarded and shared between you 150 students in ep3 teachers. this year's deadline is january 20, 2017. that's a nonaggression day. for more information about the competit

exports from the service is there could be cut by 60% of the uk ops for the single market and that would be a $2.3 billion -- for scotland degette any tell us why his conservative colleague voted against the scottish government to protect the scottish people? >> the independent fiscal commission. >> mr. speaker i'm sure the independent fiscal commission will have noted that my colleagues voted against the s&p's motion because we have absolutely no idea where the s&p stands in relation to the uk's future relationship with the eu. >> order. questions to the prime minister. >> mr. speaker this morning i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others in addition to my duties in this house i shall have further such meetings later today. >> thank you mr. speaker. a bill introduced by member organizations including faith. the support does not apply to application fees and a four-person collection fee impacts family budgets. will the prime minister undertake --. >> the issues of trying to ensure that those who are responsible for children actually pay their children when of families broken

a 7-year investigation into the uk decision to follow the us into the iraq war culminated in july. questions from british lawmakers earlier this month. and london this is 21/2 hours. >> order, order, thank you for coming here this afternoon. this is one of the most important inquiries on the table. for a very long time in this country causing great distress to families of those who were killed or wounded being in iraq of great cost to the country. many feel the cost is still there now. it has taken a long time, what happened and why. that is why they are here today. and of particular interest. and the launch of the report. and the reference that may have been, at the heart of the matter, the first line, the question for the inquiry, right and necessary to invade iraq. it might be help to concentrate on the necessary. and illegal aspect. in your view, in some, did we need to go to an imminent threat? in march 2003, my shortest possible okay. the next question must be was the evidence in front of tony blair at that time, should have told him he did not need to go to war at that time.

we will use the freedom that comes from negotiating with part or is directly to be flexible and set our own rules and forge new and dynamic trading agreements that work for the whole uk. that's also why in our negotiations on leaving the european union we are not trying to replicate other countries have or go for an off-the-shelf solution. all of us here tonight know that it's not some choice between hard and soft brexit. it's how the business and government work together to get the best deal, the right deal for britain and businesses working across the continent. but to be the true global champion of free trade in this new modern world, we also need to do something to help those families and communities. the government cannot afford to take a hands-off approach. we have to work to ensure the prosperity delivered by free trade and free markets is shared by all. that's why we are developing a new industrial strategy for everybody in the country to really benefit from the opportunities for trade brings. there are people with great new businesses and brilliant inventions and every part of

uk so you see from asides of the atlantic. so i think for us cooler heads will prevail and these problems that exist today how we get there with the very fresh set of eyes what about the marketplace? how you get better bigotry alignment? -- with this next industry shipwrecks. >> what about this transition blacks. >> and then what i said previously part of it. [laughter] >> but to pick up on what you said before to something to be ready to go with the first 100 days into the term certainly but i was so whittle troubled but congress is moving very rapidly. traffic to this set them pacified and it is going at 60 m.p.h. less than one week after the election. if they inactive have established firm policies there is flexibility for potentially that we're not taking the time to go to the process so all of the collaboration, the partnerships what does industry really need? for some of this to slowdown a little bit what are those people where are their priorities?the race s so that it is some of my concerns at this point time there are

ministerial committee but the next meeting of that is planned from early in the new year and the uk government engages regularly with the scottish government on a range of issues. >> i am sure it is not just the first minister but 22nd of june this year bruce davidson, those supporting, taylor what we want with a single mask. neither the prime minister, part of the government dragging government over the european union. >> on 23 june people of the united kingdom leave the european union, that is what the government will deliver. >> members should not seek to shut down the prime minister. the question was asked and the answer has been provided. >> it is right the prime minister has incidents and negotiations to the eu, and the campaign was very clear the rights of eu citizens would not be affected if the country were to leave the eu. they never naturalized, can the prime minister assure me she will never instruct me to take away the rights of millions of eu citizens? >> i recognize the personal passion with which my honorable friend raises this issue. i intend and expect to guarantee

exports from the service is there could be cut by 60% of the uk ops for the single market and that would be a $2.3 billion -- for scotland degette any tell us why his conservative colleague voted against the scottish government to protect the scottish people? >> the independent fiscal commission. >> mr. speaker i'm sure the independent fiscal commission will have noted that my