george martin had a press conference, the co-chair of the party there i believe it was friday and he said that any excess money would be used to train local candidates and, you know, for the green party and that's the question and that's where this is stemming from. you know, i think the politics of this are very interesting. there's been some question of why the clinton campaign isn't being more active with this, why they're holding back, you know, because if they did run for it they might look like sore losers if they did jump out in front. for your question, what does the green party have to lose? the answer is the green party has nothing to lose. they have everything to win. you're firing up the base. you're getting people out there like, you know, if you do end up using that money for local candidates, which is a question, you're building a base of green party supporters so there's absolutely no reason for them not to do this. it's an interesting balancing act the democrats have to go through though. do they hold on to this? do they, you know, question legitimacy of outcomes or

martin. black people are issue voters. we are seen black voters turn out and take over states attorneys who are not prosecuted police officers for police brutality, excessive force and killing black people. those are the kind of things we need to be talking about during this election, not quoting harriet tubman and frederick douglas in this shameful way. >> i want to go back to this issue of voter intimidation. there's a head line on politico this morning and this is the headline. it says white nationalists plot election day show of force. an excerpt from the article, quote, the oath keepers a group of former law enforcement and military members that often shows up in public heavily armed is advising members to go under cover and conduct intelligence gathering at polling places and donald trump ally roger stone is organizing his own exit polling aiming to monitor thousands of precincts across the country. i will ask you about that in a second, jennifer, but i wanted to ask nicole, do you beli

i'm george howell at the cnn center in atlanta. i'll be back with more news after the break. >>> i really ce the guy has been a monster. >> the cuban people are feeling sad because of the loss of our commander in chief, fidel castro. we wish him wherever he is, that he's blessed. >>> you hear a mix of reaction it to castro's death. hundreds of people took to the streets in miami to celebrate his death. while many in cuba are mourning the loss of their former leader. plus this -- >> i was born in havana, cuba in april of 1953. my life started basically about the same time as cuban revolution did. >> life under castro's rule. a cnn executive producer

>> that's a great question, martin. certainly we've seen presidents during their transitions in the past use the transition process and the nomination process to send signals about how inclusive their administrations will be. in 2000, george w. bush, his first pick for his cabinet was colin powell as secretary of state. part of the calculus for them was they wanted to send a message about thein cluesivi in tee and diversity of their administration. we are not seeing that with donald trump. clearly they are focusing right now on national security type appointments to send the message that that's going to be a focus of their administration, but a lot of people, especially after the divisiveness of this campaign, would like to see some women being talked about for cabinet positions, some minorities, but we're not seeing that yet. i would not be surprised if in future appointments, future nominations, we begin to see some signs of that. >> let me bring in this full screen we've got and it comes from chief strategist steve b