tv The Last Word MSNBC July 25, 2011 8:00pm-9:00pm EDT
the country, and our children's future. on this idea, though it is my own, i say hip, hip, hooray. that's "hardball" for now, thanks for being with us, "the last word with lawrence o'donnell" starts right now. breaking news after another day of no progress on the debt ceiling negotiations, the president is going straight to the american people. >> neither party is blameless for the decisions that led to our debt. >> there is going to be a two-stage process. >> either way, we have eight days left. >> now everyone has a plan, but no one has a deal. house and senate leaders are putting out competing plans. >> john boehner drawing up a house plan. >> let's do it again in april. that's basically the plan. >> i don't understand the politics of it. >> we've known if we got this close, things would start to get bad. >> the threat of default is taking its toll on the markets. >> i'm brian sullivan with your
cnbc market wrap, here's a look at how stocks are doing today, they are not doing well. dow down 83, s&p down 7, whether or not d.c. will be able to make a deal, a lot of nervousness in the market right now. >> and now we are this close. >> the tea party has republican leaders trapped. >> this is a self-inflicted wound. >> no side gets all that they want. >> we're not crazy. >> right-wing nutters in the american congress. >> difficult caucus. >> john boehner, the speaker, was reduced in some ways to being a reluctant ventriloquist for the tea party. >> how can the president negotiate with a party that keeps walking away? >> we've watched our leadership in washington behave like children. >> we want reason-based ç politics. the president has cancelled several upcoming fundraisers. >> the president, who has been reasonable. >> you can't win a primary without the backing of the 25% of americans who believe in a
literal six-day creation, think gay people choose to be gay and everyone except them will go to held when they die. >> hard choices and putting the -- that's what governing it really about. >> good evening from new york, in one hour the president will address the nation on the looming debt crisis as we approach the august 2nd deadline for a legislated increase in the borrowing authority of the united states treasury. up to now, raising the debt ceiling has always been a routine legislative matter, never the stuff of presidential addresses, never a reason for the president to ask the networks for time to address the nation. but never before has one party seriously threatened to prevent an increase in the debt ceiling. the president will speak at 9:00 p.m. eastern from the east room of the white house, house speaker john boehner has requested response time from the
networks. the duelling speeches come after two duelling plans emerged today. a plan from senate majority leader harry reid is everything the house republicans originally asked for, a $2.7 trillion cut in spending with no increase of any kind in tax revenue with the $2.7 trillion spending cut designed to match dollar-for-dollar, the amount of the increase in the debt ceiling. in effect, it is senator reid's way of callingç the house republicans' bluff. speaker boehnor's original position was a dollar-for-dollar match of spending cuts to the amount of the debt ceiling increase and no change in tax revenue. senator reid and senator chuck schumer unveiled the president's plan first, and the democrats noted they made a significant concession on tax revenues.
>> it meets the requirements that they laid out, dollar-for-dollar savings in the debt ceiling, no revenues, and cuts that they have supported. so ask yourself, the american people will be asking themselves, if they oppose this, why? since it's everything they asked for. this is a very hard decision for many on our side. our side knows that any serious debt reduction plan must include revenues, but in the interest of preventing a default, we can have the fight on revenues later when we get to the grand bargain speaker boehnor couldn't bring himself to accept from barack obama, we offer this plan. it's a tough choice, but for democrats, we get an increase in the debt ceiling through 2012, and we succeed in extending benefit cuts in medicaid,
medicare, or social security. so this proposal meets both side's bottom lines. it's a good deal. at this point, there is no alternative other than default. >> the white house quickly put out a statement endorsing the reid plan. senator reid's plan reduces the deficit more than enough to meet the contrived dola[-for-dollar criteria called for by republicans. the ball is in their court. then came the new house republican plan, which is a good deal more complicated than the reid plan. the republican plan would require two votes on the debt ceiling. the first vote would raise the debt limit by roughly $1 trillion before august 2nd, followed by a second vote in 2012 during the election year. both votes would require spending cuts in excess of the amount that the debt ceiling increase would be raised. here's how the house republican
leader eric cantor described their new plan at a news conference at the capitol. >> we put out our plan as to what it is we want, the cut, cap, and balance last week, this plan is not that. you know, the president said that he wants a higher taxes and he wants a vote through the election. this plan doesn't have that in it. so it is a situation where no side gets all that they want. >> under the house republicans latest proposal, they get multiple debt ceiling votes, pending cuts without revenue increases, and cuts to the entitlement programs like medicare that democrats want to protect. the head of the non-partisan center, bob greenstein, issued a scathing verdict on this new republican plan. house speaker john boehner's new budget proposal would require deep cuts in the years immediately ahead in social security and medicare benefits
for current retirees. the repeal of health reforms coverage expansions or wholesale aviseration for vulnerableç americans, it is tantamount and could well produce the greatest increase in poverty and hardship produced by any law in modern u.s. history. this may sound hyperbolic, but it is not, the mathematics are inexorable. rejected john boehner's plan today because it doesn't go enough. he said "while i thank the speaker for fighting for republican principles, i cannot support the plan that was presented to house republicans this afternoon, the senate should resume debate on the cut,
cap, and balance act, amend it if necessary and pass it so we can provide the american people a real solution." joining me now is house democratic whip, maryland congressman, steny hoyer, thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> good to be with you, lawrence. >> the senate today offered house republicans everything, every single point they said they wanted at the outset of this negotiating process, now some months ago. i've never seen something like that where one side offers the other side everything, and so far what you're getting is a straight rejection it seems. >> what we're seeing, lawrence, in my opinion, a very sorry and irresponsible spectacle of holding america's credit worthiness and frankly the interest of every american hostage to an increase in the debt limit which simply says america's going to pay its bills, and what has been offered by speaker boehnor is a formula
that he has rejected and mr. cantor have both rejected saying that if we did just incremental, every six months or every eight months, it would keep the economy roya$ed and it wouldn't grow. they were right then, but for political reasons simply to put the president in a corner, they have said no to every deal, to every compromise, to every effort to move this forward to adopt responsible policies which will protect the credit of the united states. very unfortunate that the republicans continue to pursue this, particularly when mr. boehnor and the president have reached an agreement tentatively on two different occasions and mr. boehnor has walked away. frankly, the republicans have walked intentionally more than barry bonds, and the fact of the matter is that we need to come to an agreement, the senate, senator reid, has offered
exactly what they asked for. mr. cantor just said we have no taxes in our bill, he was very pumped up about that to tell his constituents to tell that the richest people in america were not going to have to pay anything towards solving this problem, but frankly the senate is prepared to offer that, because they feel very strongly the responsible step to take is to make sure america's able to pay its bills on august 3rd. >> congressman hoyer, in addition to the republican's recalcitrants on tax revenues, which the reid plan now meets and simply eliminates any form of tax revenue increase, including the closing of egregious loop holes, it seems now the republicans are intent to get democrats to cast a vote for medicare cuts and get the president to sign a bill that involves medicare cuts, because they have exposed themselves to a serious of votes in the house
in favor of draconian medicare cuts, and it seems to me their dissatisfaction with the reid plan is he achieves these cuts without cuttingç medicare. >> lawrence, you're absolutely right and bob greenstein is absolutely right and your observations to the cuts to the second medicare and social security is correct. deep, devastating cuts to those programs, and they wouldn't get the votes, so it is a plan they know would fail, but it carries out their obsession with protecting the wealthiest in america and making the most vulnerable in america pay the bill. that's not good policy, and i suggest to them in the long run it's not good politics, so i would hope in the next few hours, frankly, that we could come to an agreement, the reid plan, as you pointed out, is everything they asked for, and
that we could see that pass in the senate, we'd get some republicans to vote for that, send it over to the house, let us pass it forthwith so again america's credit is not put at risk. we've done this before numerous times, parties have joined together, and, in fact, mr. boehnor has voted to raise the deficit -- debt limit on numerous occasions, both under george bush and under bill clinton, so this is something he can't say i've never done this. he has done it, why, because he knew it was necessary. he said this was going to be an adult moment. unfortunately an adult moment has not occurred in the house of representatives. >> congressman boehnor -- >> i'm congressman hoyer. >> congressman hoyer, the new republican plan, the boehnor plan, would call for two votes, meaning they would require a vote, a painful vote, politically painful vote for
everyone on the debt ceiling during an election year. of playing politics with this debt ceiling recently because the president says he doesn't want to have a vote during an election year, he wants the next debt increase after the election year. if the president is playing politics by saying he doesn't want a vote during an election year, aren't the republicans playing politics specifically by saying they do want to put the democrats and the president through another debt ceiling vote in an election year? >> i think it's very obvious that's exactly what they are doing, and as a matter of fact, their rhetoric is to put president obama in a bad spot. i disagree with chuck schumer, by the way, he said what democrats get out of this is raising the debt limit. that's not what democrats get out of it, that's what america gets out of it, a responsible country that pays its bills and protects the financial stability of our country, every credit card, 401(k) programs, stock
market, so -- mr. boehnor made the observation, speaker boehnor made the observation some months ago when politics were not on the forefront of this issue that we ought not to do exactly what he's proposing. he said we need a long-term solution, he said we need a big solution, a grand solution, the president offered that, it was clear that he could have gotten that deal, in my opinion. the first time that he walked away from the deal, and i'm absolutely convinced, having talked to the president, he could have gotten a deal the second time he walked away. the problem is i think his party wants to play politics, his party irresponsibly wants to hold hostage the credit of the united states and every american's credit to politics. hopefully mr. boehnorç will return to his original concept that we ought to have a long-term, get us out of the election era, and what he's
always said he wants is stability to businesses can count on our policies. well, he's suggested something absolutely the opposite of what he said is good policy. >> congressman hoyer, i appreciate your semantic correction of what i said about the democrats -- >> schumer said that. >> my point about it, though, is that -- and i think senator schumer's point can also be taken is we have a history here now, going back the last few decades, that the party of responsibility, the party that makes the most responsible budgetary choices, including in matters of taxation and spending increases and in spending cuts, which democrats have done in the past is the democratic party. they have become, unfortunately, your burden has been to become the party of responsibility while the republicans just run off in whatever they find to be the most politically profitable situation they can take, incl e
including the debt ceiling. >> the last four balanced budgets that were offered and passed were offered by bill clinton when he was president of the united states, and we had a balanced budget, so we have not only a rhetorically committed to it, but we've done it. we've passed statutory payments which says you pay for what you buy. simply because we bought a lot and we didn't pay for it, and republicans, of course, were in control of all the economic policy, but the issue is not what happened in the past or who's responsible, the issue is who's going to be held ç accountable, who's going to be responsible right now to make sure that america, for the first time in history, is not put in a position where it can't be relied upon by its creditors to pay its bills. that would be destablizing for not only our own markets but the international markets as well
and every american, every american will lose if we allow that to happen. hopefully the republicans will come to their senses. >> congressman steny hoyer, minority whip and democratic senator of maryland. thank you very much. coming up, how did it come to this? raising the debt ceiling used to be a non-controversial washington routine, but this year, washington has used the debt ceiling to create a new phenomenon, elizabeth drew will join me. and at 9:00 p.m. eastern, the president will address the nation about the debt ceiling negotiations, a speech you will see live right here on msnbc. >> announcer: this past year alone there's been a 67% spike in companies embracing the cloud-- big clouds, small ones, public, private, even hybrid. your data and apps must move easily and securely to reach many clouds,
not just one. that's why the network that connects, protects, and lets your data move fearlessly through the clouds means more than ever. [ telephone rings ] oh! let's do this. look who's early! [ dentist ] my patients want to walk into their dental check-up prepared to ace it. that's why i tell them to use new crest pro-health invigorating clean rinse. its invigorating action lets you know it's working to fight plaque and gingivitis and it provides all these other benefits. crest pro-health invigorating clean rinse. clean, protect, and invigorate your way to better dental check-ups. life opens up when you do.
tea party created the crisis, the politics of calamity is next. you name it. i've tried it. but nothing's helped me beat my back pain. then i tried this. it's salonpas. this is the relief i've been looking for. salonpas has 2 powerful pain fighting ingredients that work for up to 12 hours. and my pharmacist told me it's the only otc pain patch approved for sale using the same rigorous clinical testing that's required for prescription pain medications. proven. powerful. safe. salonpas. it's schwab at your fingertips wherever, whenever you want. one log in lets you monitor all of your balances and transfer between accounts,
so your money can move as fast as you do. check out your portfolio, track the market with live updates. and execute trades anywhere and anytime the inspiration hits you. even deposit checks right from your phone. just take a picture, hit deposit and you're done. open an account today and put schwab mobile to work for you. we are now about 40 minutes away from hearing what the president is currently thinking about the debt ceiling standoff. it is worth considering how we have come to this, what were they thinking is the question legendary washington journalist elizabeth drew asks in the title of her piece that tells the story of the strangest year in the budgetary history of the federal government. some day people will look back
and wonder what were they thinking? why in the midst of a stalled recovery, with the economy fragile, and a job creation slowing to a trickle did the nation's leaders decide that the thing to do in order to raise the debt limit, a normally routine matter, was to spend less money making job creation all the more difficult? joining me now is elizabeth drew, a contributor to the new york review of books. thank you very much for joining us. >> thank you, lawrence, i'mç happy to be with you. >> in your piece you say experts on the economy believe that the president has it backward, that focusing on growth and jobs is more urgent in the near term than cutting the deficit, even if it requires borrowing, but that would go against obama's new self-portrait as a fiscally responsible sentist. when did obama try to portray himself as a fiscally
responsible sentist? >> well, he said there, i got it, let's cut the debt by $4 trillion. and that was his debut as the new fiscally responsible centrist. that's the portrait he and david pluff decided on after what the president called his shellacking in november of 2010, but lawrence, this is insane, because you and i have talked about this, it is really nutty to be cutting back spending in this fragile economy when you have 9.2% unemployment. how in the world is the economy going to grow if you're cutting back on it? i can't figure that out, and a lot of people are very troubled by this and by the fact that the
president has actually accepted the republican premise that this is what needs to be done now. he didn't fight it, he joined it. >> it is striking, and i'm very much of the growth first school, which says let's get this economy growing. growth would do more to solve this deficit problem than any of the cutting proposals that are out çthere, even minor increas in our rate of growth over what we're doing now, but -- and in reading your piece, elizabeth, it was really striking to me how recently some of these ideas have come into the mix that speaker boehnor was at the beginning of the year wasn't saying there has to be a dollar-for-dollar cut in spending to match an increase in the debt ceiling, they've been making up new ideas as they've been going on. today is an inkapslation of that, new plan, different from the brand new plan of last week, but they've been coming up with new plans all year. i don't know
if i should call it now the politics of calamity or policy making on the fly or policy making in panic. politics of calamity means just as there was going to be a government shutdown if they didn't agree on the spending bill for the rest of this year, now they are acting under the threat of a default if they don't raise the debt limit. frankly, i think the president shouldn't want any of these plans. they tie his hands for the rest of his presidency, it might last less long under this situation, because he cannot let government grow, he cannot have employment grow. i should point out that it's not just that these people think we should borrow now and grow the economy, but then take the second step in a couple of years. they all agree we have to reduce the dealt, it's too high as a
percentage of our gross domestic product, but first, let the economy grow, let more people get jobs.ç don't say to kids who need college help or people looking for work or people on food stamps, sorry, you have to wait until the president gets reelected and his new image is out there, and then maybe we'll let you get the rights, the benefits that we've promised you. >> elizabeth, what should the president be saying tonight? this is a first for me seeing a president -- i think for anyone, seeing the president address the nation on the debt ceiling, asking for network time. it seems to me that if he's doing that, he should be saying something we haven't heard before and something very forceful. what would you want to hear him say tonight? >> well, i'd like to hear him say what you optimistically, friday, thought he would say or thought he was thinking, but you're ahead of him, which is forget all this. enough. let me have -- let's have a
clean bill. we should not be making economic policy for the next ten years, you know, lawrence, these proposals cover the budget for the next ten years. that's -- you're tying the hands of the presidency, i cannot possibly meet emergencies under these conditions. thank you very much for all your consideration, i tried and tried and tried to reach an agreement with you, now enough. i want a clean bill on my desk by thursday. i will veto anything else, and i will take it to the american people if you don't do that. >> that is exactly the speech that i would like to hear. that's the speech i would write for him. i think he has positioned himself perfectly now to deliver that speech, appearing to compromise on all these things. it seems to me he has successfully gotten the republican leaders onboard with the notion that failing to raise the debt ceiling is impossible, we absolutely must do it. if we must do it and time hasç
run out to do anything complicated, all it takes is one sentence to raise that debt ceiling. elizabeth drew, thank you very much for joining me tonight. >> thank you, lawrence. coming up, the president addresses the nation about the debt ceiling fight and then the speaker takes his turn, a look at what's at stake with howard fineman and richard wolffe is coming up. handle more than 165 n letters and packages a year. that's about 34 million pounds of mail every day. ever wonder what this costs you as a taxpayer? millions? tens of millions? hundreds of millions? not a single cent. the united states postal service doesn't run on your tax dollars. it's funded solely by stamps and postage. brought to you by the men and women of the american postal workers union. ♪
♪ let me make you smile ♪ let me do a few tricks ♪ some old and then some new tricks ♪ ♪ i'm very versatile ♪ so let me entertain you ♪ and we'll have a real good time ♪ [ male announcer ] with beats audio and flash, you can experience richer music and download movies straight to the new hp touchpad with webos. ♪ i like your messy hair ♪ i like the clothes you wear ♪ i like the way you sing ♪ and when you dance with me
this a is a challenge, he must pass a debt ceiling increase in his republican house of representatives. >> elections are all about politics, but the winners actually have to govern. i could see on election night some of these new members of congress would hold the debt ceiling hostage because they wouldn't understand when the politics ends and the governing begins. we are 30 minutes away from the president's address to the nation. coming up, howard fineman and
richard wolffe join me to figure out what has driven the president to go to the american people tonight, and we'll continue our coverage after the speeches with msnbc's chris matthews and melissa harris-perry. that's live at 9:00 p.m. president obama followed by speaker john boehner, address the nation.
somewhere in america, a city comes to life. it moves effortlessly, breathes easily. it flows with clean water. it makes its skyline greener and its population healthier. all to become the kind of city people want to live and work in. somewhere in america, we've already answered some of the nation's toughest questions. and the over sixty thousand people of siemens are ready to do it again. siemens. answers.
just don't feel like they used to. are you one of them? remember when you had more energy for 18 holes with your buddies. more passion for the one ya love. more fun with your family and friends. it could be a treatable condition called low testosterone or low t. come on, stop living in the shadows. you've got a life to live. [ male announcer ] so don't blame it on aging. talk to your doctor and go to isitlowt.com to find out more.
we are now 26 minutes away from the president's address on the "stalemate over avoiding default and the best approach to cuttingç deficits" according ta tweet from press secretary carney this evening. speaker boehnor will respond shortly after the president. we are joined from kristen welker from the white house briefing room, also luke russert who is on capitol hill. kristen, can you give us any
reporting on when and why the president decided to address the nation tonight? >> hi, there, lawrence, well, white house officials tell me the president wanted to address the nation tonight because this is really a pivotal moment. they say we are almost exactly one week out from the august 2nd deadline. i asked when the decision was made to make the speech this evening, the president has been considering for quite sometime, but again, because we are about one week out, he wanted it to be tonight. you're really going to hear him speak to the american people tonight. we've heard him address the issue publicly several times, lawrence, but tonight he's going to speak to the american people, he's going to really try to break this down, this is going to be debt limit 101. he's going to explain why it is so important to increase the debt limit. timothy geithner said the nation will default for the first time in history if we don't increase the debt limit. you're going to hear him address the american people in simple terms and explain why he thinks
it's important to compromise on this issue and get it resolved by august 2nd. lawrence? >> luke, did the president have any consideration about response time or maybe we'll let the president hang out there tonight on telling the american people on why they have to increase the debt ceiling. >> no, not at all, lawrence. literally since last friday when president obama addressed the press after the deal broke down, republicans have wanted to be quick to respond, because they don't want to allow the president as one of them told me, to take his case to the american people without them hearing the gop side of things. even with the possibility of hearing the president with regard of what happened over the weekend, speaker boehnor and his staff reserved the right to respond quickly. they asked for network time and were granted it. this is unprecedented for john boehner. he's never directly responded to president obama in this type of
address, national television, him in the room, no reporters, nobody else. it's going to happen in the speaker's ceremonial office off the side of the lobby. we're expected to hear a real verbal rebuke of whatever the president says, a real support of the plan he put forward, stressing it's a common sense idea, he believes in bipartisan support. their aides saying this was brought to harry reid and dismissed, democrats dispute that, but expect that line of thought from john boehner. >> just to follow up on the republican response, there's a very state of the union structure tonight, first from the president, then the response. but in state of the union addresses, the opposing party takes some time to think about who should deliver that response. and the best positions to do it. was there any discussion that maybe this message should be
delivered by someone other than john boehner? >> no, not at all. and as you know, lawrence, there's been a lot of discussion is john boehner really in control of the house, republican party, is he the man to lead them, is eric cantor trying to flank him, is mccarthy trying to -- tonight he'sç trying to assert himself as the leader of the republican party. now, granted, this plan he's putting forward, lawrence, it's not a slam dunk that he's going to get 218 votes for it. i spoke to some gop aides, they said look, this is not just john boehner asking votes and twisting arms, this is a full court press, eric cantor is going to be involved in the whip count as is kevin mccarthy and other leaders, ones that have conservative credentials. there are a lot of folks not accepting of this plan as it stands right now. >> kristen, do you get the sense at the white house that the president intends to make news tonight or is this just going to
be kind of an updated version of what he's been doing in his press conferences? >> well, you know, i heard you saying earlier, lawrence, that you wanted to hear something new from the president and i think a lot of people are saying that this evening. i think what's going to be new is potentially his tone. i don't know that he's going to be making news, but you will certainly hear him reiterate he does not support a short-term plan, of course, the plan speaker boehnor put forth is a short-term plan, would only increase the debt ceiling in the beginning of next year, so you'll likely hear him make some comments to that effect. not sure this will be record breaking in terms of him coming out and supporting a new idea, but again, he's going to be addressing the american people, it will be debt limit so 1, trying to talk to them and get them to understand why this is a pivotal moment. >> kristen welker and luke russert, thank you for joining me on this important night of a
presidential address on the debt ceiling. thank you both very much. >> take care, lawrence. >> thanks. >> following the president's address, john boehner will respond to president obama's statement on the debt ceiling negotiations. coverage and analysis of both speeches are /)qp", about 20 minutes away from the president's speech now. stay with us. [ male announcer ] a moment that starts off ordinary can become romantic just like that. a spark might come from -- a touch, a glance -- it can come along anywhere, anytime.
and when it does, men with erectile dysfunction can be more confident in their ability to be ready with cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment's right even if it's not every day. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. [ man ] do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor if cialis for daily use is right for you. for a 30-tablet free trial offer, go to cialis.com.
coming up, howard fineman and richard wolffe join me to preview president obama's 9:00 address to the nation. ooo. sounds pricey? nah, with the hotels.com summer sale, you can find awesome deals for places nearby. interesting... wow, i'm blown away. you look great. hotels.com summer sale, save up to 30%. and get a free kindle. hotels.com. be smart. book smart.
president obama is now minutes away from addressing the nation from the east room of the white house as hopes for keeping the nation nrnm defaulting seem to dim with every passing day. the incredible, political, and financial drama is about to reach a nationwide, primetime, television audience. joining me now, msnbc political analyst howard fineman, editorial effort for the huffington post, richard wolffe, author of "revival 2.0, how the obama white house is making its political comeback." some would say the comeback is to try to portray himself as a centrist, deficit cutting president. has he achieved that, do you think, in his public postures in the debt ceiling negotiations up to this point? >> well, the polls suggest so.
there's more than 50% of the country thinks that the president isn't responsible for the current crisis, in fact, doesn't think that democrats are responsible for the debt ceiling situation or the state of the economy. they blame republicans, president bush overwhelmingly, and that's across the board, that takes in independents too. you're going to hear from the president tonight. there's going to be a lot of emphasis on being reasonable, compromise, the need for compromise, and he's worked tirelessly for that. of course, that doesn't guarantee this will come to anything like the compromise he's been working towards, but that sets up what is a very hard lined position from this president, which is anything short-term will be vetoed. >> howard, we were getting initial reports from the white house saying the speech could be from ten to 15 minutes long, now indications it could be from 15 to 20 minutes long, does that
mean the president's finalç pencillings leer could be directed towards his base since he has been so clearly trying to get into the center on deficit reduction? he has been in many ways worrying his base in terms of what he's going to do in terms of medicaid cuts, for example. >> it's not a good sign if the speech keeps getting longer of the i just e-mailed one of the top white house officials and said is this going to be -- i asked him, is this going to be a stern speech or this is an i'm the only grownup in the room kind of speech. the answer i got back was it's going to be a little bit of both. the problem the president has on his right flank is if he really calls out the tea party, which are, of course, running the show here. this is all about the tea party. if he calls out the tea party and really goes after the tea party, which the polls that richard cited would seem to give him room to do, then he makes it
all that much more difficult to get any kind of deal at all at the very end. on the other hand, if he tries to say look, i'm the compromiser, i'm the adult in the room, i've got to do this, he does risk continuing to upset his democratic base, because the way they view it is that the president has capitulated on almost every turn to the right wing of the republican party. the deals that we're talking about here, both deals, the republican deal in the house and democratic deal in the senate, do not talk about any revenue raisers at all, and to most democrats, that's outrageous, so the president seems to be negotiating against himself most of the time, atç least accordi to his own party. >> richard, i've been trying to figure out why is the president doing this tonight, why does he pick tonight? it seems to me if he's going to go to address the nation, ask for network time, to do it this
way, he has to say something new. he has to make some kind of news that something different than what he said friday night at his press conference that we covered, it's a friday night in the summer, america wasn't exactly staring at every minute of his press conference. is he ready, do you know, is he ready to add something new to what's happening here? >> well that depends on your definition of what's new here, but i tell you what really lies behind it, i was talking to a white house official over the weekend, first of all, the anger friday night in the press conference was very real. in fact, in my experience, i have not seen him that angry since jeremiah wright had his comeback tour. when he gets angry, that sticks with him, it carries him through a point where frankly according to a confidant of the president,
he is dead clear he is willing to stake his presidency on this. this is not a minor twist, an incremental moment. this is a defining moment, in his view, because again in his opinion, he cannot govern, and the economy cannot pick up any kind of speed with these kinds of games going on. if he is held hostage and the economy is held hostage every six months to the latest demands of the tea party, then there's no way forward for him or for the country, and that's what he has to go out and explain tonight. i don't know if that's news, in a sense, but he does have a resáonsibility to explain that to the american people and to the members of congress who want to push him this hard. >> howard, hold that thought, we're going to take a break. stay with us, we're going to come right back and have more on the speeches tonight from the president and the speaker of the house when we return. [ male announcer ] things seem better with travelocity's best price guarantee.
all eyes on the white house now as president obama prepares to address the nation at 9:00 p.m. eastern, as we stand by to bring that to you, we turn once again to msnbc political analyst howard fineman and richard wolffe. 4zmujt making a point when we g cut off by that commercial, so go ahead. >> what i was going to say is the president has to make the point, i think will make the point, that it's not about politics for him, it's about the economy, and i think there's a lot of truth to that. i think he believes and i think his advisors are telling him and he's right in every three or four or six month debt limit debate like this is a killer for economic confidence and stability. he's got to say it's not about me, not about my reelection,
it's about the economy. he's get to say from his point of view, now that he's willing to be touting the reid plan, the harry reid plan, spending cuts and no tax increases, it's clear the republicans are the ones playing politics with this issue. he's got to do that in i'm the most reasonable guy in the room time tone. that's the point he's got to make tonight. >> it's not all about politics, it has to be about the country. he has declared his candidacy for reelection as president of the united states. how worried are -- is the team in chicago, the reelect obama team in chicago, at what they've been watching? it seems there are many, many different ways, every day, in which all of this could go wrong for the president politically in his reelection campaign. >> well, just from a purely political argument, actually not doing the deal, the grand deal with john boehner helps democrats, helps the campaign, because they can go after them
for that ryan budget, which has these massive cuts to all those social programs that are very popular to all the voters, so i don't think the politics is made harder from this, you never know how people are going to react to an economic collapse if that's what it comes to with default, but i want to add one point, the message for the politics is not just for the regular people in washington or the campaign folks.ç there's a message this president wants to get out to the business leaders and wall street types who they are talking to privately and saying you do understand we need a long-term deal, they are saying yes, of course, we need a long-term deal, but they believe, these business leaders, that this president will blink. they think he'll take the short-term deal just because they want to avoid a default, and they are not prepared to go to the republicans and say you really have to do this for the sake of the economy. there's a narrow-casted message here for those business folks to say to them it's time to move. it's time to step up and go
public and put real pressure on the republicans to put them in line. >> the fact the president hasn't done that forcefully is one of the tactical mistakes he's made here. the establishment republicans, the chamber of commerce republicans, the corporate republicans, the republican ceos needed to be called out to do battle with the tea party. that's the battle that the republican mainstream should have been forced to engage in instead of leaving the president to have to do it, and john boehner, who's too weak to do it. >> howard, i've been calling this an address to the nation, which is the normal term we use for these things, but in many important ways, this is an address to the world, especially the world financial markets who have begun to wonder quite a while ago what is happening here, is it possible that the safest asset in the world, united states treasury bonds may become unreliable? that is something the president has to deal with in a worldwide
way tonight, isn't it? >> well, perhaps, but this isn't the situation in which the president can show tremendous strength. i mean, he's facing a situation where he may have to be presented with and may have to veto or accept somethingç he vy much doesn't want. i agree with richard that a lot of the politics internally might play to his advantage in the long run, but right now this is not going to be a demonstration of strength by the president. you know, he's staring at the final days of a confrontation with a congress that has, i think it's fair to say, made him look pretty weak in many ways. the republicans are playing a tough game, a tough, even cynical game, and this isn't going to -- look, the markets are smart. they know this is a political crisis, not a deeply economic one in and of itself. one reason why the markets haven't tanked so far is they know what's going on here. they know this is a political dance that tonight -- tonight is
not a state of the union speech, it's a back-to-back two states of disunion speeches. people in the markets understand that right now. >> richard, given the markets, can the president suggest that he will veto certain things, he has made that kind of reference publicly before, but as we get closer and closer to the deadline for raising the debt ceiling, is it possible for him to both reassure the markets and suggest there's a version of this that he'll veto? >> i think beyond reassuring the markets at this point. the markets have a perfect understanding of how washington plays its games, we all do. it is unprecedented. when the market turns, the bond market stampedes, you have to get out the way. there's nothing you can do. it's not a finely-tuned organ. it is a brutal thing that will take down everything. if they believe default is real, really the market is saying whether the president solves it, this will be