tv CNN Newsroom With Poppy Harlow CNN November 20, 2016 3:00pm-4:01pm PST
protections for the environment. that kind of agreement would obviously exclude u.s. workers and businesses and access to those markets so for all those reasons, i believe that tpp is a plus for america's economy, america's workers, american jobs. i think not moving forward would undermine our position across the region, our abilities to shake the rules of global trade in a way that reflects our interests and our values. finally, our cooperation with apec has been critical to our historic progress in fighting climate change. bringing thearis agreement into force, agreeing to limit aviation emissions, phasing out dangerous facs. we phase out fossil fuels and our commit to doubling our renewable energy. as i wrap up my last summit and
likely my last foreign trip as president, i could not be more proud of the progress we have made together. obviously, the work is never done. given the prosperity and security we seek for not only the united states but our allies and our partners, i continue to believe that america will have a vital role to play in creating and sustaining a strong enduring leadership role in the asia pacific. with that, let me take some questions. i'll start with darlene superville of a.p. >> thank you, mr. president. you've been telling world leaders this week that president-elect trump is unlikely to govern in the divisive way he campaigned. i'm wondering how you're certain given first group of people he has chosen hold the same views that he espoused as a candidate.
to follow up on your meeting today with president putin, did you discuss with him russia's alleged meddling in the u.s. election and are you concerned that the kind of involvement that we saw in this year's campaign will be the new normal going forward in future u.s. elections? >> well, what i've said to world leaders is the same thing that i've said in a number of press conferences, which is the president-elect now has to put together a team and put forward specifics about how he intended to govern. he hasn't had the full opportunity to do that yet. people should take a wait and see approach in how much his policy proposals, once in the white house, once he's sworn in, matches up with some of the rhetoric of his campaign.
my point is you can't assume that the language of campaigning matches up with the specifics of governing legislation, regulations and foreign policy. i can't be sure of anything. i think, like everyone else, we'll have to wait and see. as i've said before, once you're in the oval office, once you begin interacting with world leaders, once you see the complexities of the issues, that has a way of shaping your thinking and in some cases modifying your thinking because you recognize this solemn responsibility not only to the american people but the responsibility america has the largest, most powerful country
in the world. i can't guarantee that the president-elect won't pursue some of the positions that he's taken. what i can guarantee is that reality will force him to adjust how he approaches many of these issues. that's just the way this office works. i've said before if these issues were easy, if ensuring prosperity, jobs, security, good foreign relations with other countries, if all that was simple then it would have been done by every previous
president. i'm a pretty good presidential historian. i've looked at my 43 predeces r predecessors and seems like for all of them, even the best ones, that you end up confronting realities that you didn't anticipate. i think the same will happen here and that's a good thing. that's an important thing. with respect to president putin, i didn't have a meeting. we talked briefly while we were in between sessions. the conferring that i had with him was consistent with the conversations i've had over the previous several months. indicating to him that we are still deeply concerned about the bloodshed and chaos that's being sewn by constant bombing attacks
by assad and the russian military against populations in aleppo and the need for us to arrive first at some humanitarian cease-fire and begin moving towards a political transition of some sort. i talked to him about ukraine and the need for us to get things done. i urged him to instruct his negotiators to work with ourselves, with france, with germany, with ukraine to see if we can get that done before my term is up. as usual it was a candid and courteous meeting. very clear about the strong differences that we have on policy. the issue of the elections did not come up because that's behind us. i was focused in this brief
discussion on moving forward. i had already made very clear to him our concerns around cyber attacks generally, as well as specific concerns we had surrounding the dnc hack. i don't think this will be the norm. as i've said before, the concern i have has less to do with any particular misinformation or propaganda that's being put out by any particular party and a greater concern about the general misinformation from all kinds of sources domestic, foreign, on social media that make it very difficult to voters -- for voters to figure
out what's true and what's not. let me put it this way, i think if we have a strong, accurate and responsible press and we have a strong civic culture and an engaged citizenry then various attempts to meddle in our elections won't mean much. if generally we've got elections that aren't focused on issues and are full of fake news and false information and distractions then the issue is not going to be what's happening from the inside, the issue is what are we going to ourselves from the inside. the good news is that's something we have control over.
gardener harris. >> thanks so much for holding this press conference. if you had hotels, real estate and other businesses distributed around the world prior to becoming president, would you have thought it appropriate to sell them off and put the cash proceeds in a blind trust or is it okay for the president of the united states to be personally vulnerable to the policy decisions of the foreign leaders he meets and in the foreign policy decisions he makes as president? also, just briefly wa lly what' complaint about how the nsa has done their job and are you considering firing admiral mike rogers? >> that was a rhetorical question, that first one. rather than comment on hypotheticals, let me say specifically what i did.
obviously, my assets were significantly smaller than some other presidents or president-elects. we made a decision to liquidate assets that might raise questions about how it would influence policy. basically, had our accountant put all our money in treasury bills. the yields have not been massive over the course of the last eight years. just because it simplified my life. i did not have to worry about the complexities of whether a decision i made might even inadvertently benefit me. that's consistent with the broader approach that we've taken throughout my
administration, which is to not just meet the letter of the law but to go well beyond the letter to the spirit of the law. not just for me but for the people in the white house and in our leadership positions. we have established a whole set of rules, norms, play books that just keep us far away from the line. early on in the administration there would be questions about could a staff person go to this conference or what should they do about this gift that was provided. i think it was maybe our first general counsel who was responsible for setting up our guidelines and rules inside the
white house that said if it sounds like it would be fun, then you can't do it. that's a general test. if it sounds like something you would enjoy or appreciate, no go. as a consequence, i'll knock on some wood here because we got two months left, i'm extremely proud of the fact that over eight years we have not had the kinds of scandals that have plagued other administrations. when i met with the president-elect, i suggested to him that having a strong white house counsel that could provide clear guide posts and rules would benefit him and benefit his team because it would eliminate a lot of ambiguity. i think it will be up to him to
make determinations abo how he wants to approach it. i know what worked for us. i know it served the american people well. because i made a promise to the american people that i could not fall into some of the familiar habits of washington, that i wanted a new kind of politics, this was one indicator and at the end of the eight years i think i can say the american people i delivered on that commitment. with respect to cyber, the nsa, admiral rogers is a terrific patriot and has served this country well in a number of positions. i generally don't comment on personnel matters here. i can say, generally, that we have spent a lot of time over the last several years looking at how we can organize our cyber
efforts to keep pace with how rapidly the environment is changing. our critical infrastructure, government data, financial systems are vulnerable to attack. in both and nonh-state actors ae getting bet r and better at it. it's becoming more and more rapid. it's inevitable that we'll have to modernize and update, not just the tools we use to defend those assets and the american people, but also how we organize it. it is true that we are exploring a range of options in terms of how we organize the mission that
exists. rich. >> earlier this year george w. bush warned he would be the last republican president. now republicans have won the white house, controlled the house and senate, two-thirds of state legislatures, 34 governorships and charges of a shallow democratic bench behind you. are you worried you could be the last democratic president for a while? your predecessor made sure to offer no public criticism of you during your time of office. will you equally with hold criticism for president trump even if he attempts to dismantle much of what you have accomplished? thank you. >> no, i'm not worried about being the last democratic president. not even for a while.
i say that not being cute. the democratic nominee won the popular vote. obviously, this is an extremely competitive race and i would expect that future races will be expected as well. i certainly think it's true that politics in america right now are a little up for grabs. some of the old alignments within both parties, democrat and republican are being reshaped. although the results of this election involve some of the specifics of the candidates andn every election, democrats do have to do some thinking about how do we make sure that the message we have is received
effectively and results in winning elections. this is something that i've been wrestling with throughout my presidency. when you look at the proposals i put forward, they garner majority support. they believe in raising the minimum wage. the majority believes in common sense gun safety rules. the majority believes in investing to rebuilt our infrastructure and create jobs. the majority believes in making sure that people aren't going bankrupt when they get sick. the majority agrees with all the individual components of obamacare. i think there was a gallup poll this week subsequent to the election that showed the general public has a more favorable view of democrats than republicans.
as i noted my approval ratings are quite high. what's been true during the course of my eight years is that does not always translate. too often it hasn't translated into working majorities either at the state level or the federal level. some of that is just the nature of our system and geography. as long as wyoming gets the same number of senators as california, there's going to be some tilt towards republicans when it comes to congressional races. the fact that a lot of democratic voters are bunched up in big cities and a lot of republican voters are spread out across geography gives them an advantage when it comes to
congressional races. some of it is just political bad luck. for example, i came in as an economy was in free fall. although we took the right steps to save the economy, in my mid term election in 2010, people couldn't see the recovery and not surprisingly the president's party got punished. we lost control of a lot of not just congressional seats but also gubernatorial seats and state legislative seats. that happened to be the year that the census is done and you start doing redistricting and those republicans took advantage of political jgerrymanderring. democrats have cast more votes or more votes have been cast for democratic congressional candidates than republican. yet, you end up having large republican majority. there's some structural problems that we have to deal with.
you can't make excuses about the rules. that's the deal. we got to do better. doing better involves us working at the grass roots, not ceding territories. going out in areas where we might not have a chance of winning but we're building up talent, we're making arguments, we're persuading. we're talking about the things that matter to ordinary people day-to-day and trying to avoid some of the constant distractions that fill up people's twitter accounts and if we do that, then i'm confident that we'll be back on track. i don't think that there has to be a complete overhaul here.
i think there does have to be better organization, a smarter message and one message i do have for democrats is that a strategy that's just micro targeting particular discreet groups in a democratic coalition sometimes win the elections but it's not going to win you the broad mandate you need. the more we can talk about the more we have in common as a nation and speak to a broad set of values, a vision that speaks to everybody and not just one group at a time, the better off we're going to be. i think that's part of the reason why i was able to get elected twice is that i always tried to make sure that not only
this proposals but also in message that i was speaking to everybody. you had a second part to your question? i've said before, president bush could not have been more gracious to me when i came in. my intention is to certainly, for the next two months, finish my job, and then afterthat, to take michelle on vacation and get some rest. spend time with my girls and do some writing, do some thinking. i want to be respectful of the office and give the president-elect an opportunity to put forward his platform and
his arguments without somebody popping off in every instance. as an american citizen who cares deeply about our country, if there's specifics that have less to do with some proposal or battle but goes to core questions about our values and our ideals, and if i think that it's necessary or helpful for me to defend those ideals then i'll examine it when it comes. what i do know is i have to take michelle on vacation.
juliet. >> thanks, mr. president. given what you just said about the strong differences that you and president putin have on the future of syria and the conflict there, can you talk about how you see that unfolding at the end of your tenure and the beginning of donald trumps. if you have concerns that if we eliminate the islamic state in eastern syria and western iraq, we may be allowing a permanent al qaeda safe haven. the you say to what extent you think the united states has fulfilled its responsibility to protect in that instance? in terms of finishing your job, in the last week you exercised your executive authority on multiple fronts, finalizing oil and gas, rules on public lands and a five-year leasing plan banning drilling, many
republicans say you should hold off finalizing anymore rules as you're headed out the door because they pose many of them and will seek to overturn them when they control the legislative and executive branch next year. what do you say to that suggestion? >> on the second question, these are the same republicans who suggested they didn't need to confirm a supreme court justice when i was nine months out until the next election. i think the general approach seems to be that probably two days after my re-election i should stop until the next election. i don't think that that's what the constitution calls for. the regulations that we have issued are ones we have been working on for a very long time. they have been subject to extensive public notice and
comment and everybody's known they have been out there. these aren't things that we've been surprising people with. they're well considered. they're the right thing to do. they're part of my task of first name -- finishing my work. i recognize when the new administration comes in and a new congress comes in that they will have the option of trying to undo some of those rules and regulations that we put into place. that's part of how democracy works. i feel strongly these are the right things to do and i'm going to make sure i do them. with respect to syria, as i said, i think even on this trip in a previous press conference, i am not optimistic about the short term prospects in syria.
once russia and iran made a decision to back assad in a brutal air campaign and essentially a pacification of aleppo regardless of the potential for civilian casualties, children being killed were wounded, schools, hospitals being destroyed then it was very hard to see a way in which even a trained an committed moderate opposition could hold its ground for long periods of time. the issue that obviously i've wrestled with for the last five
years how involved should the united states be, what are legal constraints in such involvement, what are our moral obligation, what are our strategic interests? those haven't changed. i continue to believe that we did not have a legal basis for military intervention there. it would have been a strategic mistake given the work we still had to do in iraq, the counter isil campaign, ongoing operations in afghanistan that we have worked tirelessly to arrive at political transition of some sort and that could alleviate the suffering and provide humanitarian access. we will continue to do that work all the way until the last day that me and john kerry and
others have the authority to speak for the united states government. ultimately, it takes two or in this case four or six or eight to tango. we're just not getting help or interest from those parties that are supporting assad and assad has been emboldened. this is man who has decided that destroying his country, turning it to rubble and seeing its population scattered or killed was worth it for him to cling to power when he had the option to peacefully engage in a transition that could have kept the country intact. that's his mentality. it's not a mentality we support.
that's the mentality that the russians and the iranians have been willing to support. at this stage, we're going to need to have a change in how all parties think about this in order for us to end the situation there. our ability to go after isil, i think can be sustained. there's no doubt that we'll continue to be extremist forces in and around syria because it's still going to be in chaos for quite some time. there will be elements in iraq just as there's been elements in afghanistan even after the taliban were swept out, even after we killed bin laden. i think we can effectively reduce the risk and take their
key external operators off the field. the thing i'm probably most concerned about is making sure that even as we do that, u.s. policy, u.s. statements, u.s. positions don't further radicalize muslims around the world or alienate and potentially radicalize law-abiding muslims who are living in europe or the united states. that's why i think it's important for us to understand those are our key allies in this fight not enemies.
>> expected a very different transition under way than the one you might have envisioned. i wonder if you sought to approach this trip reflecting more on the powers and influence of the presidency on the world stage so you might be offer the kind of counsel to your successor. you talked during your re-election campaign about this fever that had consumed the republican party, an effective political strategy to block you on issues where there might be common ground. what would be your advice to democrats who may see that as the same kind of path to taking back power that the republicans employ? what would your advice be to house democrats about whether or not to reelect nancy pelosi as the party leader in the house? >> i'll work in reverse. i think nancy pelosi is an
outstanding and historic political leader. so much of what we accomplished was accomplished because of her smarts, her tenacity, her legislative skill and i don't normally meddle with party votes, and certainly on my way out the door probably, i shouldn't meddle here. i can not speak highly enough of nancy pelosi. she combines strong progressive values with just extraordinary political skill. she does stuff that's tough, not just stuff that's easy. she's done stuff that's unpopular in her own base because it's the right thing to do for the american people.
i think she's a remarkable leader. with respect to democrats and republicans and how democrats should deal with a new administration, i think you give them a hearing. i don't want them to do what mitch mcconnell did when i was elected, meet the day of and say our sole objective is to not cooperate with him on anything even if the country is about to go into a depression so that we can gain seats in the mid terms and ultimately defeat him. that's not what the american people send us to washington to play those games. that's not my advice to democrats. my advice to democrats is know what you care about and what you stand for and fight for your principles even if it's hard
fight. if there are areas where the new administration is doing something that's going to be good for the american people, find way to work with them. if you think it's going to be a problem, then say so and make the argument. the touch stone is what's good for the american people. that's worked for me. it means at the end of the day and at the end of eight years, i can look back and say that i consistently did what i thought was best. doesn't mean you don't make mistakes, but it means you're being true to your oath and the commitments you made to the people who elected you. in terms of reflecting on the
u.s. presidency as i've been traveling, i think the main reflection i have and the main advice that i give to the incoming president is the united states really is an indispensable nation in our world order. i say that as somebody who has gone out of his way to express respect for every country and its people and to consistently acknowledge that many of the challenges that we face are not america can solve on its own. what i also know is that the basic frame work of the world order coming out of world war ii
and on through the end of the cold war was shaped by a set of ideals and principles that have worked for the vast majority of people, not just in america, but around the world. the notion of democracy and rule of law and a free press and independent judiciary and open markets and a social welfare state to moderate some of the sharp edges of capitalism. lifting up issues of human rights and investing in public health and development not just within our own borders but elsewhere within the world.
working with multi lateral institutions like the united nations. making sure we're upholding international norms and rules. that's what's made the modern world. there's been times where we have not observed some of these norms as well as we should and have been accused of hypocrisy. here in latin america there's been times when countries felt disrespected and on occasion had cause for that. there's times where we haven't observed these values in our own country and have fallen short of our ideals. that basic structure is the reason why the world is much wealthier, much more secure and less violent, healthier, better educated, more tolerant than it
was 50 years ago. that requires constant work. it doesn't just happen on its own. i've said this in europe. i've said this in places where there's this push back against this modern order but you take an example like europe before that order was imposed. we had two world wars in span of 30 years. in the second one, 60 million people were killed. not half a million, not a million but 60 million. entire continents in rubble. in places like the asia pacific before that order existed, you routinely saw famines of millions of people. not just concerns about low
wages but people dying because they didn't have any food. or drinking water or died of cholera or simple diseases if somebody had some penicillin. what i would say would be that we all share responsibilities for improving that order and maintaining it and making sure it's more inclusive and delivers greater hope and prosperity for more corners of the world. we all have responsibilities, every nation in respecting the dignity and worth of their citizens and america can't do it all for everybody else.
there are limits to our reach into other countries if they're determined to oppress their people or not provide girls education or siphon off development funds into swiss bank accounts because they're corrupt. we're not going to be able to handle every problem, but the american president and the united states of america, if we're not on the side of what's right, if we're not making the argument and fighting for it even if sometimes we're not able to deliver it 100% everywhere, then it collapses. there's nobody to fill the void. there really isn't. there are other very important countries like a china if it weren't for china's cooperation,
we couldn't have gotten the paris agreement done. china's not the one who was going around organizing 200 nations to sign onto a paris agreement other putting together the paper and the policy outlines and the conceptual frame work. russia is a very significant military power but they're not worrying right now about how to rebuild after a hurricane in haiti. we are. i've said before that's a burden that we should carry proudly. i would hope that not just the 45th president of the united states but every president of the united states understands that's not only a burden but it's also an extraordinary
privilege. if you have chance to do that right then you should seize it. all right. thank you, everybody. [ applause ] >> there you ever it, history being made. president obama giving his last international press conference as a sitting president. a lot of ground was covered. we're going to get through all of it. he spent more than 50 minutes speaking with reporters there after making a statement with what they discussed. starting with trade. we'll get to that in a moment. let's bring in my panel. an anita mcbride is here. she's also the former chief of staff to first lady, laura bush.
and athena jones who is traveling with the president. let me begin with athena. he began his remarks talking about trade. he jumped right in. he said that globalization has not benefitted enough people. it's not benefitted many workers. he was very -- it was clear that he was addressing the president-elect and saying you can't just throw out the trade agreements we have. you have to make them better so the income gap gets smaller and you help more people. interestingly, he pushed the case still for tpp, the transpacific partnership even though he knows it's dead in the water once donald trump becomes president. >> reporter: that's right. this is something that the white house has spent years working on. this entire rebalance of u.s. foreign policy toward the asia pacific region is something that
the obama administration has invested heavily in. more than two dozen trips to asia during his eight years as president. they believe it's important to engage in this region because it has so much of the world's middle class responsible for so much of the exports, u.s. exports and imports from the u.s. and it's going to be important to engage there. the failure of tpp, the fact we know president-elect trump has been hostile to that trade deal and others, we know it's not going to get a vote in the lame duck congress. it's a big blow to this whole rebalance policy. it's not surprising to see the president continuing to try to push and try to influence his successor to give these deals a chance. i also thought it was interesting that the president was asked about a lot of the things we have been talking about. for instance, the potential conflicts of interest among the
business holdings of president-elect trump. i don't know if we have time to play what we said. >> we do. i'll just give me team a minute to cue that up because he also spoke in the same breath about the importance of the white house counsel and what an important choice that is to oversee anything that would be perceived as a conflict of interest. the way he put it is his team told him if it's anything fun, you can't do it. that was the line that helped him make decisions. let's listen to his actual answer. >> i can't be sure of anything. i think, like everyone else, we'll have to wait and see. as i've said before, once you're in the oval office, once you begin interacting with world leaders, once you see the complexity of the issues, that
has way of shaping your thinking. i can't guarantee that the president-elect won't pursue some of the positions that he's taken, but what i can guarantee is that reality will force him to adjust how he approaches many of these issues. >> sorry. we played the wrong thought. you were saying to play this sound bite. let's play for our viewers what he said about whether he would have put all of his asset sbos a blind trust and deal with the conflicts of interest. let's play that. >> basically, had our accountant put all our money in treasury bills. the yields have not been massive over the course of the last eight years. just because it simplified my
life. i did not have to worry about the complexities of whether a decision i made might even inadvertently benefit me. >> there it is. >> reporter: that's right. of course, as you stated he talked about the importance of having a strong white house counsel's office. he said he was not going to directly respond to the question about president-elect trump. instead he talked about the approach he took and what he said also is he wanted to not just follow the letter of the law but the spirit of the law. he reiterated something he said in a press conference earlier this week saying he was extremely proud that his administration had not have to deal with some of the big scandals and ethics issues that have plagued past administrations and he held up his own white house counsel's office and approach to not just following the letter of the law but staying far from the line,
not towing the line, staying far from that legal murky line. >> stay with us. live from lima where the president made these remarks. anita, let me go to you. what was your reaction to what we heard from the president? specifically on the point about making clear that there would be no conflicts of interest, not even the perception of them, and also saying whoever really saying that the white house chief counsel is a critical role to fill. >> it absolutely is a critical role to fill. i've worked in three white houses and the decisions is a line you don't cross. it's all there to protect the president and his interest. you don't need the distraction of having any ethical concerns. that extends not only to the presidents dealings but also to the entire white house staff. there are reasons for that. there's so much that comes on a
president's plate. they don't need to be dealing with ethical issues related to their business. >> the first thing the president was asked was how can you guarantee that president-elect trump will not govern in the divisive way he campaigned? i mean, this election was divisive on both sides. you can't be sure of anything. we have to wait and see. then he said this office shapes you. he went on to say reality will force him to adjust to the office. >> i think the president, you watch this arc of what he's been saying and doing since the election. he is a methodical, lawyerly person. he proceeds in a logical order. he sets up two paths. one in which donald trump surprises him and leads well. or the other path, i think he is systematically setting up conditions under which he can be more active and critical of
trump than we've seen. first of all, he is setting down trip wires he says are reasons for concern on ethics, the u.s. role in the world, being the indispensable nation, and the importance of divorcing yourself from your business interests as president. he's setting out trip wires that ma if donald trump crosses them, he'll feel empowered to speak out. today, in what was probably the most important thing he said, he said, look, i'm going to take michelle obama on a vacation. i'm not going to be involved in any legislative fight. he clearly did not rule out speaking out when he said more fundamental issues were at play. he rejected, he passed the opportunity to say he would take the george w. bush approach of being silent. >> he can't pop off on everything. >> right. >> if there is the point where i think our values are coming into question, i will jump in. what was your read -- by the way, he also made a little news there, saying he told donald trump how important his pick is
for white house counsel, which i thought was interesting. what was your read on him referring to mitch mcconnell and mcconnell saying, we are going to make you a one-term president. he said in terms of the president-elect, give him a hearing. give him time. >> that was very, very important. he is -- many people in the democratic party in this country are upset about how the election played out. president obama has been clear, we need to give president-elect trump the opportunity to do what he will. as ron has just said, the early indications are he is going to govern based on the early picks exactly as he ran his presidency. president obama did an excellent job of placing the decisions that are going to be made in a historical precedent. going back to fdr, truman, all the presidents since the second world war who have built this international order. the united states not only exists in and benefits from the order but has been the protector of it. now, he is saying, president trump, you have the keys to the nuclear codes, to the country, but also to the world.
we all, americans and others, need to be very careful and very cautious. president-elect trump steps up and realizes this incredibly important responsibility, we should support him. if not, we need to be careful and cautious. >> one of the reporters also asked him, are you concerned about being the last democratic president for a while? he sort of laughed and said, i'm not concerned about that. by the way, he said hillary clinton won the popular vote. but what did you make of his response overall to the question of -- because it plays right into his legacy, right? i mean, what happens post this administration? >> sure. i think in that respect, he's a little bit defensive. he knows he is leaving with the republicans having control of the white house and congress, and have for a while. they're doing well in state legislative bodies. the numbers increased. a lot of the math is red. even with hillary clinton's totals. he's under criticism from democrats who fear that the result of this is no one is
going to be there to actually defend his legacy. i think he was trying to offer explanations of why he was in a tough spot. >> athena jones, he also, quickly here, called nancy pelosi outstanding, a historic leader. said he cannot speak more highly of her. this is someone whose position as the leader of the democratic party and the house is under a lot of pressure right now. >> that's right. he was asked to weigh in on the whole discussion about just who should be leading not only the dnc, the democratic national committee, but the democratic party on capitol hill. he said he didn't want to weigh in, but he had high praise for leader employpelosi as a histor remarkable leader. he said she had tenacity and was good at politics, basically. he used this opportunity to sing the praises of leader pelosi. along this whole theme of him saying, look, it's not that we have to change our ideas and our
ideals as a democratic party, we just have to do a better job, he says, of communicating those ideals to more people. and interestingly, he noted when he was making his two runs for the white house, he made sure he spoke to everyone. and that is one reason he believes for his success, having been elected twice. poppy? >> those comments about pelosi matter now because her position is being challenged by representative tim ryan of ohio right now. jamie, ron, anita, athena, stay with us. we'll dissect more in the hour ahead. first, wall street's post election rally slowed a bit but the thanksgiving holiday could bring a milestone for the dow. >> hi, poppy. the dow could reach 19,000 this holiday week, but thanksgiving week is actually pretty quiet for the stock market. the last three years, the dow posted tiny increases. retailers, of course, looking
ahead to black friday, when the holiday shopping season officially kicks off. overall, holiday sales the past few years have been sluggish. black friday and cyber monday have been the highlights, the bright spots. amazon could hit sales records on those days. it started early this year, offering one day prime discounts on friday. amazon stock is up 11% this year, but it struggled over the past month. look, the big question at this point is, with the election over, rising wages and stocks near record highs, are consumers in the mood to spend this holiday season? >> we'll see. christina, thank you so much for that. we're going to take a break. much more on the historic press conference straight ahead. mobility is very important to me. that's why i use e*trade mobile.
top of the hour. 7:00 p.m. eastern. you're live in the cnn newsroom. i'm poppy harlow in new york. we're following breaking news this hour. final good-bye for president obama on the world stage as he wrapped up his last international news conference before leaving office in 60 days from now. the president